| Author |
|
Amroth 
Greenhorn
Joined: 09 Mar 2011
Location: usa
Status: Offline
Points: 78
|
 Topic: Worlds End Announcement
Posted: 18 Dec 2011 at 00:16 |
With regards to the WE member who has posted here. You have my response in your private mail. I would be happy to entertain any thoughts from you regarding my proposal good Sir.
With regards to you StJude, You are wrong in your assertion. Your ignorance is understandable as you were not a player in Illyriad at the time. I am sure many old blight members who are now in the Cave of Knowledge will be happy to clarify your mistaken ideas. How exactly your comments pertain at all to the subject of the post is a mystery but I am impressed that you take every opportunity to attempt to smear and cause mayhem, with regard to me as a player in Illy. This would indicate that I have a rather large sovereignty claim in your head. I on the other hand, never think of you at all little jude save to smile at your vindictive and somewhat simple attempts at wit.
There once was a troll called StJude. Who excelled only at being rude. His cities all shrank as he had no decorum until at last he was relegated to talking trash on the forum. Happy Holidays Jude, better luck next year. 
Edited by Amroth - 18 Dec 2011 at 08:25
|
 |
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 17 Dec 2011 at 18:50 |
 Capricorne wrote:
Well Scaramouche, don't bully Amroth that way please. If he can't make you look as an aggressive alliance he won't be able to satisfy his own bloodlust while looking himself as the shield of justice and liberty... So be kind and accept the fact that fighting for a sov square is a casius belli to go on an all out war.
Thank you, Cap. |
I loled.
Anyway, If you haven't figured out by now that Chimps and RES love picking on weaker alliances, you haven't been paying attention. My first week in Illy Amroth regaled me in IGMs with tales of his defeat of Dark Blight (which I later found out were not his to tell, but rather they were the property of the magnanimous Crow confed). To hear his majesty tell it...well, different story. IGM me if you wish to see his tales, they are hella funny.
Also, you won't see the_dou...the_dude in this thread because he can't win the publicity war. He needs secrecy while he tries to manipulate behind the scenes.
Edited by StJude - 17 Dec 2011 at 18:51
|
|
Capricorne
Wordsmith
Joined: 15 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 117
|
Posted: 17 Dec 2011 at 18:24 |
Well Scaramouche, don't bully Amroth that way please. If he can't make you look as an aggressive alliance he won't be able to satisfy his own bloodlust while looking himself as the shield of justice and liberty... So be kind and accept the fact that fighting for a sov square is a casius belli to go on an all out war.
Thank you, Cap.
|
|
scaramouche
Forum Warrior
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 432
|
Posted: 17 Dec 2011 at 18:02 |
Amroth wrote:
What I am saying is that the square does not directly abut any player city and so is not subject to automatic sovereignty expectation. Personally I think the space should have been surrendered to WE after diplomatic negotiation and concessions to RES for the spot. This was not the case though. WE who has proclaimed in their own alliance statement to be a peaceful alliance has in effect nullified their own claim by these actions. The spaces are now under WE control due to martial attacks issued by WE members.
Let every alliance know, whether it means us good or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and success of Liberty. |
my god you talk some rubbish.
just because an alliance says its peaceful...does that mean to say we allow everyone to take advantage of that?
p.s we lost two of our biggest members, one of which might i add, left us because we wasn't aggressive enough....what does that tell you about WE Amroth?
pps...just out of curiosity..ive seen a good many ppl say in this thread about why RES seem to be the perpretrators and WE have been quite vocal in our defence.yet i cant say ive seen one post from TD's alliance in their defence of taking it.
Edited by scaramouche - 17 Dec 2011 at 18:19
|
|
Gragnog
Postmaster
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 17 Dec 2011 at 10:09 |
|
Thanks for your input amroth. Negotiations were under way, but due to petty demands, and lack of willingness to listen to reason, WE had no choice but to use other means. How long do you propose diplomatic negotiations to continue? Into eternity? Lets face it, this is between WE and RES, and I think those few who are involved are actually having fun. It is a great leaving curve for all involved, and it would be even more fun for all involved if people not involved would refrain from making unnecessary comments.
|
|
Amroth
Greenhorn
Joined: 09 Mar 2011
Location: usa
Status: Offline
Points: 78
|
Posted: 15 Dec 2011 at 23:45 |
What I am saying is that the square does not directly abut any player city and so is not subject to automatic sovereignty expectation. Personally I think the space should have been surrendered to WE after diplomatic negotiation and concessions to RES for the spot. This was not the case though. WE who has proclaimed in their own alliance statement to be a peaceful alliance has in effect nullified their own claim by these actions. The spaces are now under WE control due to martial attacks issued by WE members. Let every alliance know, whether it means us good or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and success of Liberty.
|
|
Capricorne
Wordsmith
Joined: 15 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 117
|
Posted: 15 Dec 2011 at 22:22 |
|
"so much for the front porch argument"Oh my, you can't be serious Amroth. The spot is 2 squares away from the WE city! If the same thing happened to me I'd gladely send a diplomatic message to the ex owner of those troops explaining why a suspicious army wich cross my borther unannounced has vanish. And I'm pretty sure my whole alliance will back me up on this.
And for the "punitive actions should be expected" thing; do you mean by your doing?
Cap.
|
|
Sloter
Forum Warrior
Joined: 14 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 304
|
Posted: 15 Dec 2011 at 20:33 |
|
I see now, sov owner or that dolmen has changed indeed.It will probably change hands many times before it is all resolved.
|
|
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
|
Posted: 15 Dec 2011 at 20:20 |
|
I gather Amroth means that attacks on the square have happened between now and the posting of this thread. In my mind the square (assuming we are still talking about the same one) is within 2-3 squares of the WE city and not remotely close to the RES settlement, so it's their right to defend that area however they choose.
|
|
Sloter
Forum Warrior
Joined: 14 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 304
|
Posted: 15 Dec 2011 at 20:06 |
|
I dont think that actions of single player (for which he was kicked out of alliance) can be contributed to entire alliance,i think that peacefull solution can still be found.Greater are chanses for that if others refrain from adding oil to the fire.Best to leave punitive actions aside.
|
|
Tweet
Worlds End Announcement
Topic Options