| Author |
|
Sgt..Shanks 
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Location: BRITAIN
Status: Offline
Points: 56
|
 Topic: Worlds End Announcement
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 07:13 |
From the Council of:
Worlds
End
It may
come as no surprise that things have been tense lately between our alliance and
RES, and recently things have taken a turn for the worse. An attack has been
sent out by one of our members, without any approval or sanction by our
council.
WE do not approve of rogue attacks and for this reason the member in
question has been dismissed from the alliance.
First and foremost WE are a peaceful alliance; however this does not
mean that WE will sit idly by while others use provoking and or hostile actions
against us that demonstrate hypocrisy of their own policies regarding others.
Peaceful methods of conflict resolution are our preferred route, however WE do not rule out strategic militaristic action if all other avenues are exhausted.
Furthermore, WE do not condone forum warfare; this is only a statement
to address the current actions at hand. Any questions or concerns, please mail myself or a member of our council in game.
Sincerely,
The
Council of Worlds End
|
 |
Myrin
Greenhorn
Joined: 06 Oct 2011
Location: Illinois
Status: Offline
Points: 52
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 10:07 |
|
I hope you guys can work it out, good luck!
|
|
shadow1
New Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 11
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 13:12 |
At last we do the wright thing...but to kick out that member was a wrong thing to do!! A lot of members have been complainig about td and his ratfrend,ratboy....nothing have our leader done and it has been no support from the council.....by kicking out this player..you all named him an free target for res members....if hes not been taken back..i will leave WE...and im not alone doing that then!!! Shad. |
|
Gemley
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 14:48 |
 shadow1 wrote:
At last we do the wright thing...but to kick out that member was a wrong thing to do!!
A lot of members have been complainig about td and his ratfrend,ratboy....nothing have our leader done and it has been no support from the council.....by kicking out this player..you all named him an free target for res members....if hes not been taken back..i will leave WE...and im not alone doing that then!!!
Shad. |
You always have been a aggressive player havent you shadow1? In fact I remember when I used to play Illyriad and you attacked one of my alliance members more then once on the grounds that she was in your territory, good for her that The Dude got you to stop. No surpise that you are one of the players wanting to attack The Dude.
|
|
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
|
|
EternalFire
Greenhorn
Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 72
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 15:00 |
|
Whats the whole story here? From a RES and WE viewpoint preferably.
|
|
Rupe
New Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Location: Ch
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 16:42 |
EternalFire wrote:
Whats the whole story here? From a RES and WE viewpoint preferably.
|
In brief
Rez took sov that was close to WE WE didn't like it. Argue, Argue, Argue. Here we are
|
|
EternalFire
Greenhorn
Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 72
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 16:48 |
|
How close?
Isn't it common courtesy to assume if a city is next to high sov, as im assuming is what it was, its as good as theirs?
|
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 17:15 |
EternalFire wrote:
How close?
Isn't it common courtesy to assume if a city is next to high sov, as im assuming is what it was, its as good as theirs?
|
this is just to answer the question of eternalfire
-131|-432 sovsquare -129|-432 WE city -137|-431 Res city
Edited by lorre - 27 Nov 2011 at 17:38
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
|
Prometheuz
Forum Warrior
Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 230
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 17:22 |
I suppose this issue is done and dusted because Res haven't commented and WE have said that their statement is their final word.
They say that they don't condone forums wars which on the face of it - is a good policy. Fair enough. I can respect that.
Not knowing the true facts we can't really make any comments and might not help the situation if we do.
Even so all you alliance leaders (and I don't just mean Res or WE but all of you) out there should spare a thought for the little guy in these situations.
Prometheusx Herald Grudge Bearer [GRUJ]
|
|
EternalFire
Greenhorn
Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 72
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 17:43 |
|
It's easy enough to see what should happen with the current information,
RES returns the sov square, everyone goes on merry way. if not, then theres a simple skirmish between the two parties, through words or combat. Then the winner of that gets the square. so simple really.
|
|
Tweet
Worlds End Announcement
Topic Options