| Author |
|
EternalFire
Greenhorn
Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 72
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 18:12 |
|
I'm not implying that they are, I'm stating that the public more often then not supports the one they like best, in most situations, in Real life and in online games.
|
 |
Belthazor
Greenhorn
Joined: 10 Oct 2010
Location: Asgard
Status: Offline
Points: 97
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 18:06 |
It's not about popularity, it's about justice.
Not everyone likes to go on GC and do good deeds, some like the shadows better. Doesn't mean their bad people.
|
|
We work in the Dark to serve the Light
|
 |
EternalFire
Greenhorn
Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 72
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 18:00 |
|
Not meaning to *diss* this guy, but TD is a very favored player in this community, I bet if it went to war you would see many people siding with him/her.
|
 |
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 17:58 |
Prometheuz wrote:
Even so all you alliance leaders (and I don't just mean Res or WE but all of you) out there should spare a thought for the little guy in these situations. |
RES and WE are both large alliances with a number of large players. I imagine they can take care of themselves and their alliances without help from the rest of us.
|
 |
Belthazor
Greenhorn
Joined: 10 Oct 2010
Location: Asgard
Status: Offline
Points: 97
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 17:55 |
Gemley wrote:
You always have been a aggressive player havent you shadow1? In fact I remember when I used to play Illyriad and you attacked one of my alliance members more then once on the grounds that she was in your territory, good for her that The Dude got you to stop. No surpise that you are one of the players wanting to attack The Dude. |
Aren't you suspended?
|
|
We work in the Dark to serve the Light
|
 |
EternalFire
Greenhorn
Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 72
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 17:43 |
|
It's easy enough to see what should happen with the current information,
RES returns the sov square, everyone goes on merry way. if not, then theres a simple skirmish between the two parties, through words or combat. Then the winner of that gets the square. so simple really.
|
 |
Prometheuz
Forum Warrior
Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 230
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 17:22 |
I suppose this issue is done and dusted because Res haven't commented and WE have said that their statement is their final word.
They say that they don't condone forums wars which on the face of it - is a good policy. Fair enough. I can respect that.
Not knowing the true facts we can't really make any comments and might not help the situation if we do.
Even so all you alliance leaders (and I don't just mean Res or WE but all of you) out there should spare a thought for the little guy in these situations.
Prometheusx Herald Grudge Bearer [GRUJ]
|
 |
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 17:15 |
EternalFire wrote:
How close?
Isn't it common courtesy to assume if a city is next to high sov, as im assuming is what it was, its as good as theirs?
|
this is just to answer the question of eternalfire
-131|-432 sovsquare -129|-432 WE city -137|-431 Res city
Edited by lorre - 27 Nov 2011 at 17:38
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |
EternalFire
Greenhorn
Joined: 25 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 72
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 16:48 |
|
How close?
Isn't it common courtesy to assume if a city is next to high sov, as im assuming is what it was, its as good as theirs?
|
 |
Rupe
New Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Location: Ch
Status: Offline
Points: 39
|
Posted: 27 Nov 2011 at 16:42 |
EternalFire wrote:
Whats the whole story here? From a RES and WE viewpoint preferably.
|
In brief
Rez took sov that was close to WE WE didn't like it. Argue, Argue, Argue. Here we are
|
 |