Wording glitches in some in-game texts

Oh, and I notice you speak of "multiple merchants guilds". I always cackle at such use of "multiple. It is well-established (i.e. as valid as anything in this lovely creole we speak) but I rather regard "multiple" as the generaliser of "double", "triple" and so on; so a multiple merchant is a double merchant, triple merchant or so on (whatever that might mean) and a multiple guild is a double guild (perhaps of quarrying and masonry), triple guild, etc.; each is a multiple guild and more than one such would be multiple guilds; indeed, several multiple guilds.

The generaliser I'm used to for two (as opposed to double), three (not triple), four and so on is "several" (which, just to be archaic, used to have another meaning we'd now express by "separate", which is how the legalese "jointly and severally" comes about) rather than "multiple". The only "multiple language" I know of is "double-Dutch" (a mythical language even harder to make sense of than Dutch), so that's what I think of when someone claims to speak "multiple languages", although I can only think of this one multiple language.

... but that's just how I use and read the words, I'm not going to claim you're "wrong" to use it that way. I just reserve the right to cackle out loud at the imagery your choice of language conjures up in my warped mind.

DeathDealer89: algebra is my zeroth language - I have an unfortunate tendency to take for granted that readers shall do any math that may be needed, without me having to labour the point. In this case, the target audience is developers; I'm guessing they can cope.

More wording glitches:

Blights claim to act "at this city". Geomancy spells come in sets of three, conferring benefits "to this city", "in another city" and "in any city". It's clear what that means. However, with the exception of Carrigen's Infestation (which says nothing about which city it affects) all the Blights describe themselves as acting "at this city". It might be better to phrase that as "in any city" or "in targeted city" or similar, rather than reusing phrasing that, for geomancy, is clearly used to mean the spell affects the city that casts it - blights would be pretty useless if that were their only use ! (I know it can be beneficial to cast a mild blight on one's own city, affecting a resource of which it has a surplus anyway, to obstruct enemy attempts to blight a critical resource; but this would be valueless if the enemy couldn't cast the blight on my city in the first place, because it's not their city and their cities can only cast the spell on themselves !)

In a mail reporting the outcome of a battle in hilly terrain: "Large hills such as this are difficult for attacking mounted units, but provide opportunities for ranged to unit to show their worth." There's an extra "to" in there.

Trying to claim sov without the research gives the following message

To claim Sovereignty you must (at least) have both the skills <i>Serfs</i>, <i>Landholding</i> and <i>Socage</i> - all of which can be found in the City research category.

Other than the use of 'both' for three research skills, these skills are found in teh Sovereign research category, not the City one.

Spotted in a report: "Green Anacondas" but "Yellow Anacodas" (missing 'n').

Maybe they meant the best footsoldiers come from wooded areas?