| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Teiru 
New Poster
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 9
|
 Posted: 21 Nov 2010 at 14:15 |
Dont really care if I, or some of us for that matter, get destroyed, that is bound to happen to alot of other players as well which is also a great part of the game. It's just the way they do it that makes them look pathetic.
We welcome any support out of your own free will, but we wont beg for it nor will we beg for mercy.
|
 |
Finrod
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 42
|
Posted: 21 Nov 2010 at 13:51 |
In my initial post, I listed an attack from Love World Order. That player, and alliance, has made it clear that they are not involved and have declared they will not attack again. WE holds no grudge and considers the matter with LWO resolved.
However, the #10, 13, and 15 ranked alliances continue to attack, assissinate, and siege World's End, ranked #17. We still don't know why, and we can't mount a defense against those odds that will give us a hope of surviving.
I know TMM is the main focus of Illyria right now, and they've ruined the game for countless new and smaller players, but if we don't receive help, and the attacks continue, we will be destroyed.
|
|
Teiru
New Poster
Joined: 01 Oct 2010
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 9
|
Posted: 21 Nov 2010 at 12:43 |
I just fail to see why Cyan is being
sieged. He had nothing to do with PoS or Valar. There have been some issues with
a small member Kome and SirTwitchy but that has been sorted out, or so we
thought.
The only contact Cyan had was that a
PoS member had sent a mail to Cyan accusing him for sending 900 thieves to one
of his settlements. The proof for that was that Cyan is the only player big
enough to have that high amount of thieves in our area.
Firstly, you dont need to have 60k+
pop to have 900 thieves. A 10k heavy diplo player can easily have that. There are plenty of players of that size in our area.
Secondly, Cyan does NOT thieve/attack ACTIVE players. This is being stated in his profile since he was a 500
pop player, if that would happen that you should contact him regarding this
etc.
Thirdly, Cyan doesnt use only 900
thieves. At first we thought the letter was a joke and Cyan said in alliance
chat: Like I would use a petty number like 900 for thievery lol.
Im aware that this is a war game
and should be played as such, otherwise it would be pretty boring. But cant
you at least start a war for a more proper reason than on the basis that Cyan
is the only big player enough to have 900 thieves? Is that all your justice is worth?
While we are at it and as far
thievery goes, Komes settlement in the more southern region was being harassed
by PoS thieves which we solved in a diplomatic manner. Another 200 pop player,
NikNaki, in the same region had been harassed by thievery before joining our
ranks.
Im afraid that both Valar and PoS
are mere puppets for the real puppet master behind all of this.
Please feel free to add your side of the story.
Edited by Teiru - 21 Nov 2010 at 13:47
|
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 21 Nov 2010 at 12:38 |
 -hypocritical- wrote:
Sgt..Shanks wrote:
Bullies are using the TMM smoke screen.. its unfair and unjustified:( |
erm... TMM are the bullies? |
they mean an other alliance is using the how u say it (activety)? around TMM to make there move unnoticed
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
|
-hypocritical-
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 81
|
Posted: 21 Nov 2010 at 12:36 |
Sgt..Shanks wrote:
Bullies are using the TMM smoke screen.. its unfair and unjustified:( |
erm... TMM are the bullies?
|
|
Sgt..Shanks
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Location: BRITAIN
Status: Offline
Points: 56
|
Posted: 21 Nov 2010 at 11:05 |
Bullies are using the TMM smoke screen.. its unfair and unjustified:( The above was my original statement.. and i stick by it!! However please note that my opinion was and remains to be, that [Valar] WERE and STILL ARE using the oportunity (and cover) to cause WE members many problems. Do Valar even acknowlege how many Alliance members of WE, are actually "New players"??  Not to mention (unfortunately) the 8 members that have not logged on for over 4 weeks. Therefore I can think of no other word than "Bullies" :P oportunistic, yes! But Bullies.. None the less :(
Edited by Sgt..Shanks - 26 Nov 2010 at 12:50
|
|
HonoredMule
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
|
Posted: 20 Nov 2010 at 18:01 |
Aw, it's snowing and I can't go out biking. Whelp, guess I'll go declare war on somebody. 
|
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224
|
Posted: 20 Nov 2010 at 16:54 |
True, King... Must be the changing of the seasons...
|
|
King EAM
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Location: Nun'ya
Status: Offline
Points: 272
|
Posted: 20 Nov 2010 at 13:51 |
|
Lots of wars this time of year...
|
|
Finrod
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 42
|
Posted: 20 Nov 2010 at 13:49 |
Approximately two days ago Prisoner's of Society, Caliquendi, and Order of the Valars began military and diplomatic attacks against World's End. Today an attack was dodged by Love World Order. We have sent messages asking why these alliances are attacking, but have been met with silence. Only one member of Prisoner's of Society has responded, stating a WE member is "rumored" to be behind spell and diplo attacks against various Prisoner members.
I've asked for reports so we can deal with it in house, but have received no further replies, ergo, no reports. I remain open to the possiblity that members of WE have committed said actions, however, no one is providing information for us to act on. Further, despite multiple attacks landing and en route, no formal declaration of war has been issued.
The leadership at World's End is seeking to learn what crimes we have been found guilty of to warrant a united attack against us from four alliances, three of whom are individually larger than World's End. While we remain open to the possiblity we have acted provocatively, because we don't have more information, our current position is that these attacks are unprovoked, or in the least, a disproportionate response to grievances committed by one member.
We continue to refrain from counter attacking at this time until more information is known. But if the attacks continue, our survival may depend on our response.
Any and all information or defensive aid is welcome,
Finrod
|
|
Tweet
Why the war against World's End?