why isnt there talk of the war here |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 13> |
| Author | |
Pico
New Poster
Joined: 22 May 2015 Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Jun 2015 at 22:54 |
|
@Mahaut
“The whole shebang quite obviously has nothing to do with land claims - if that was the case why the peace with two land claiming alliances?” I´ll tell you why. After 6 alliances declared war on Stomp, He-man sent 2 sieges at our member Odoacer, for which we cleared and sent sieges back at him. Unfortunately, our sieges were cleared by T-O and our blockades, sieges and our attempts to strike back at He-man were constantly undermined by T-O. Stomp felt that there was no need to be at war with T-O since they do not have a land claim, their sister alliance does, and we feel that T-SC, RE, Hans, Death, BB, and any other small alliance that have a land claim represent no real threat to Stomp. The only alliance that can enforce their land claim is SIN, and that is why Stomp came to peace terms with T-O, to be able to concentrate our efforts on SIN. After peace was agreed, and following with a NAP with T-O, we finally were able to raze one of He-man’s towns. Also, after Sin declared war on Stomp, they immediately sent sieges at our smaller members’ towns in BL, small towns that weren´t able to defend themselves and were successfully razed by Sin. Stomp received a couple of days ago an igm for peace negotiations from Jax, the leader of Hansa, where he says the following: “We understand your're at war with the ideology of land claims. We will not revoke our current claim (as our future immigration of new players which is planned out); however we will not* enlarge the claim on The Pirate Isles as previously planned, in return for peace. [If need be, we will change our rules on our land claim, as to where you will pay taxes instead of there being a requirement to exodus (this will be our greatest extent to a change in our land claim)] I hope this proposal is enough to end the war between us.” This is where I can´t seem to grasp the concept of players that think they have a right to impose the following on other players: 1. Pay taxes instead of there being a requirement to exodus What Jax is saying is that currently, players that land a town in their “land claim”, are required to exodus, but if Stomp agrees to peace with Hansa, they will not require players to exodus but to pay taxes… I simply don´t understand this, and it´s fine, they seem to think they have a right to play that way, I have the right to challenge their land claim, and that´s what this is all about. Regardless that Stomp has agreed for peace with RE and T-SC, we did not agree to recognize their land claim, RE required Stomp to recognize it, they came to us for peace, we told them that we will not recognize their land claim, but that Stomp feels RE represents to threat at all, considering their size. Hence I offered peace without recognition of their land claim and they took it. Till this day I have not heard from T-SC, I negotiated with T-O and they only wanted Stomp to fight a fair war, which I found to be rather ironic considering they were harboring a player and an alliance that has no concept of what it means to fight fairly. I tried to implement a fair fight, regardless of what Brandmeister may think, I approached my opponent, gave them a chance for diplomacy, gave them a chance to prepare for war, unlike Sin´s actions, where they without warning declared war and immediately sent sieges at our weakest players. Which is fine, they are free to play however they see fit. I just found it rather funny that T-O was asking Stomp to fight fair, which makes me wonder if T-O had all the facts, clearly I see a lot of people making assumptions, and just because they don´t understand a certain situation does not mean that their initial impression of the war is correct. Stomp´s strategy has changed, and it´s now public, we will try to concentrate our efforts on Sin, if we can get support there might be a fight, if not, we will have to end the war. Either people don’t care to know the facts, or just want to come to the forums and express their views with the intention to show the community that they are mind readers and have Stomp all figured out. If you want to know something, ask, Stomp has nothing to hide. Thanks |
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Jun 2015 at 17:00 |
|
That's true. As others have pointed out, most wars in this game have very little to do with the officially stated reasons.
|
|
![]() |
|
twilights
Postmaster
Joined: 21 May 2012 Status: Offline Points: 915 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Jun 2015 at 16:57 |
|
disagree, this it totally about land claims and its just in beginning stages....right now the teams are just positioning themselves and taking out potential threats...there is so much politics going on its just crazy...both sides are recuiting and actually its one of the more interesting conflicts the game has had...the future game play of broken lands will probably be decided...its fun to watch and i wish the best of luck to both sides and also to maybe a third party that might get involved!
|
|
![]() |
|
Mahaut
Wordsmith
Joined: 20 Jan 2012 Location: North West UK Status: Offline Points: 173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Jun 2015 at 16:42 |
|
Well I haven't mentioned any motive they might have for wanting PvP. That could as easily be lingering animosity as any other reason. What it quite obviously doesn't have anything at all to do with is land claims.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Jun 2015 at 16:10 |
|
Can it really be attributed to a desire for PvP? The original war declaration was one player (main and alt) with 25-30 cities in Elgea, versus basically one guy with one big, vulnerable city in Elgea. I don't consider 25:1 odds to be a real PvP challenge. The hostility always seemed inspired by other events, with the land claims as a convenient scapegoat. It's worth noting that Stomp didn't declare war against any other territory claims except T-SC, and that the two parent alliances involved (Shade/DARK and T-O, respectively) were adversaries in the last war. Lingering hostility seems like a more plausible explanation.
|
|
![]() |
|
Mahaut
Wordsmith
Joined: 20 Jan 2012 Location: North West UK Status: Offline Points: 173 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 Jun 2015 at 13:30 |
|
Ok so my personal suspicions on the whole land claim war have been confirmed.
The first alliance declared on by Stomp was The Southern Cross. Who have since bowed out of the war and arranged peace with Stomp - But who still have a land claim posted on their pages. Another alliance involved in the war was Roman Empire who has since bowed out of the war and arranged peace with Stomp - But who still have a land claim posted on their pages. From my understanding of the situation the other alliances involved in the war declared on Stomp due to them declaring war on The Southern Cross. The whole shebang quite obviously has nothing to do with land claims - if that was the case why the peace with two land claiming alliances? This is quite simply just a few players wanting some PvP but deciding they wanted to claim some rather questionable moral high ground first so they could pull in recruits to help them out. I feel quite sorry by anyone taken in by the propaganda. Disclaimer. None of the above in any way reflects a stance taken by my alliance. Vicx has no official stance about this war, this is a purely personal view.
Edited by Mahaut - 28 Jun 2015 at 13:34 |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Captain Kindly
Forum Warrior
Joined: 19 Aug 2011 Location: Fremorn Status: Offline Points: 276 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 Jun 2015 at 13:30 |
|
@Pico:
You can be sure about something and still be wrong. I have been proven wrong in life before. In this case, I don't think I am though. Speaking about trolling, please let that illyriadnews or whatever that account is called chime in. |
|
![]() |
|
ajqtrz
Postmaster
Joined: 24 May 2014 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Jun 2015 at 23:02 |
|
I do believe we fail to understand motivation if we attempt to reduce what we do to a single motivation. What motivates us can be thought of as pressure to go in one direction or another. Thus, some motives may be self-seeking and others altruistic...and both may push us in one direction or the other at the same time. So STOMP may or may not be motivated, in part, by boredom, or wanting to oppose land claims, or having an axe to grind, or liking the game to be more lively, or believing Santa Clause will bring them cookies someday if they go to war. Pure motives are usually a myth and mixed motives more the norm. For this reason, I think, it's probably unwise to guess STOMPS motives past what they have actually said, or, perhaps done, though what they have done may be subject to some interpretation.
AJ |
|
![]() |
|
Pico
New Poster
Joined: 22 May 2015 Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Jun 2015 at 22:16 |
|
"What I am sure about is that the reason STOMP claims, namely doing it for the good of the whole of Illy as aj claims, is complete bogus.
Of course I may be wrong. Maybe watching these cycles of instigating mass wars for over 3 years now for ridiculous reasons, has made me cynical." I wonder how somebody can be absolutely sure of something and in his very next phrase state that he could be wrong... Excellent job Captain Kindly, keep on trolling |
|
![]() |
|
Agalloch
Wordsmith
Joined: 12 Feb 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 127 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 Jun 2015 at 19:27 |
|
Before my time and I don't claim to speak for everyone else that is in Stomps but I know none of that applies to me , all those happenings are before my time and I know almost nothing about it all, mostly conflicting stories at best from what I have seen.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 13> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |