Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - why isnt there talk of the war here
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

why isnt there talk of the war here

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 13>
Author
Janders View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Jul 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 36
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Janders Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 22:49
You are right, historic analogies are always imprecise.

What I want to say is that claiming land isn't a purely defensive/passive move.
Back to Top
Mahaut View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Location: North West UK
Status: Offline
Points: 173
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Mahaut Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 22:43
Janders I don't think the Native American situation is relevant.
The problem there sadly was down to two cultures fundamentally not understanding what the other meant. The Native American didn't have any experience on which to base an understanding of what was meant when an early settler purchased land from him. And the settler didn't (or probably couldn't, given it was most likely his or her own first experience of another culture) understand that the Native American had no reference.
This changed quite quickly. Its quite possible - even more than likely that a large number of those land purchases were made in good faith on both sides, but we like to put people into "sides", it's lazy history but far easier.
This is hardly the case here or we wouldn't be finding endless long and boring posts on the subject. I think everyone knows what is meant by land claim.

Edited by Mahaut - 21 Jun 2015 at 22:44
Back to Top
Janders View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 02 Jul 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 36
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Janders Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 22:16
I wouldn't find a neighbor purchasing a plot of land in my neighborhood aggressive.  But I live in a place with zoning and plots and personal property.  Illy has NOT been like that.

OTOH, think of the native americans when the first europeans "bought" claims of lands from them.  The idea of land ownership was foreign.  Was this an aggressive act?  Certainly not as aggressive as guns and swords, but it is not a passive or defensive act to claim ownership of something which previously had been communal property.
Back to Top
Mak View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2015
Location: Minnesota, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 11
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mak Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 21:33
Originally posted by ajqtrz ajqtrz wrote:

Interesting.  If I come up to you on the street and wave a gun in your face and tell you to give me all your money, and you knock me down, you are the aggressor?  Intimidation, threats and/or coercion are aggressive acts in themselves.  In legal terms if I threaten you, your property, or your right, and you strike first because you believe the threat to be real, it's called "provocation" and it's an acceptable defense.

Now you can argue that STOMP escalated.  That is true.  But the escalation was necessary because rights had already been taken from them and all of us.  The right to settle in a particular spot is a right over which we are arguing.  To do nothing to force the issue would have been to accept ipso facto the right to make land claims as they have already been made.  If the land claimers had discussed their methods and desires and the whole issue of land claiming, and gone through the obviously long and tortured road of discussion and persuasion, and had convinced almost everybody that it would be good for the game BEFORE foisting the claims upon us, then you could argue that STOMP was out of line.  But if you steal from me and I try to take back what you stole by force, it's you who have been the aggressor.

You would think such a point would be so obvious that their would be no need to outline it.

AJ

For the sake of educated discussion I must contest this "slanted" view and anecdotal example with one from the other perspective. That way you do not dominate three theaters of discussion Ajqtrz Wink. Those with land claims are hardly men and women "waving a gun around". Nor are they individuals that are using intimidation or provocation. To stake out land and claim ownership is not an aggressive action in itself. Is purchasing or buying land a "threat" to the neighbors around you? Does it warrant an attack or fighting? You would be hard pressed to make an argument with such logic. These alliances in the Broken Lands are bartering with the community at-large to establish peaceable agreements in lands that are largely uninhabited. Many of these alliances even grandfather cities and players in these lands as an act of good faith. They are hardly "bullies" or "ruffians" with threats. 

Additionally, it is not an argument that STOMP escalated hostilities. Not only did they escalate, they started military engagements that were not even in the Bitter Lands. That is fact. If this was such an affront to the termed "freedom fighters" why was there a period of two months between the first land claim and fighting where no action was taken? If this was encroachment on people's rights there should have been diplomacy, discussion, or deeds taken immediately to preserve those liberties. Let us be honest with ourselves and say what this is. Chaos for the sake of chaos. Large players wanted to use their troops and raise their ratings because global events have been stale in the absence of a tournament.  As someone who has watched this community for five years this follows the usual pattern of summer seasonal hostilities. People have extra time and create a false casus belli to "spice up" the server. Do not scapegoat this new trend of land claims as being immoral to the community at large. The several alliances in the south are fighting and claiming territory to ensure the future for their posterity, especially the new small population players.

To rephrase your words: "You would think such a point would be so obvious that there would be no need for me to analyze the situation"


For those who are sick of forum posts like this....





Edited by Mak - 21 Jun 2015 at 21:41
"Life is a Beautiful Struggle"-Mos Def

Former Player-Makanalani (World's End)
Proud Member of Dark Blight
Back to Top
ajqtrz View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 24 May 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 500
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ajqtrz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 18:49
Interesting.  If I come up to you on the street and wave a gun in your face and tell you to give me all your money, and you knock me down, you are the aggressor?  Intimidation, threats and/or coercion are aggressive acts in themselves.  In legal terms if I threaten you, your property, or your right, and you strike first because you believe the threat to be real, it's called "provocation" and it's an acceptable defense.

Now you can argue that STOMP escalated.  That is true.  But the escalation was necessary because rights had already been taken from them and all of us.  The right to settle in a particular spot is a right over which we are arguing.  To do nothing to force the issue would have been to accept ipso facto the right to make land claims as they have already been made.  If the land claimers had discussed their methods and desires and the whole issue of land claiming, and gone through the obviously long and tortured road of discussion and persuasion, and had convinced almost everybody that it would be good for the game BEFORE foisting the claims upon us, then you could argue that STOMP was out of line.  But if you steal from me and I try to take back what you stole by force, it's you who have been the aggressor.

You would think such a point would be so obvious that their would be no need to outline it.

AJ


Edited by ajqtrz - 21 Jun 2015 at 18:50
Back to Top
Aurordan View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar
Player Council - Ambassador

Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Aurordan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 16:06
Well, the topic is not talking about the war.  I'm not talking about the war.  I think that counts. 

But yeah, alliances tend to avoid the forums when they can for stuff that could in any way reflect negatively on them, because that's just good policy.  Speak softly and carry a big stick and all that.   
Back to Top
GM Rikoo View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Community & PR Manager

Joined: 28 Mar 2014
Location: Mars
Status: Offline
Points: 1233
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote GM Rikoo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 16:02
Originally posted by Aurordan Aurordan wrote:

Yeah, I'd support a mandate that forum accounts be linked to and share names with active player accounts too. However, the rules don't currently say anything about it, so there's no reason to get accusatory over it.  (And Illyriad Post gets a thumbs up in my view just because I generally support anything that lets people involve themselves more in the game.)

Get back on topic, please. 

We will make a post about this if you want, but bear in mind that there are many reasons we keep them separate. 

If you do not hear back from me, nothing has changed. If you see a post that you think is breaking the rules, report it.

Thanks!


GM Rikoo


Illyriad Community Manager / Public Relations / community@illyriad.co.uk
Back to Top
Aurordan View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar
Player Council - Ambassador

Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 982
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Aurordan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 15:59
Yeah, I'd support a mandate that forum accounts be linked to and share names with active player accounts too. However, the rules don't currently say anything about it, so there's no reason to get accusatory over it.  (And Illyriad Post gets a thumbs up in my view just because I generally support anything that lets people involve themselves more in the game.)
Back to Top
Alcie View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 308
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Alcie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 15:14
Originally posted by Captain Kindly Captain Kindly wrote:

Originally posted by ajqtrz ajqtrz wrote:


CK
I'm doing stuff on the Illyriad Post myself.  Is admitting that an act of bravery?  Gee, never thought of myself as courageous.


Is that an admittance to forum account sharing? If it is, you are in trouble.




One of illyriadpost's first posts said 'Please send your news to illyriadpost@gmail.com'.   Although I don't know for sure, this sounds to me like only one person has the account login info, but others (maybe potentially anyone) asks that one person to post stuff. People often post for others on the forum (sometimes because they have no forum account themselves). I see no problem with this--not that different than asking someone in-game to do something for you.

As for having multiple forum accounts.. interesting question. Since they don't have to be linked to the game accounts in any way at all, I see no reason why you couldn't have more than 1 (or even more than 2) from reading the terms of service or what you click to register a forum account. Although personally I prefer forum posts linked to real players so that I get some context. If there are 'extra' forums-specific terms of service, they should make it very clear in both the rules section and on the thing you agree with when you register for the forums.   

This is all very off-topic.. but almost everything in this thread is sort of off topic since 'why don't we talk about war' turned into people talking about war xD If the devs have clarification on this issue, a new thread (as well as maybe updates to the rules section wording) would be more useful than responding here.

Personally I wish the forum accounts were part of the game accounts so that this wouldn't be an issue to start with... A lot of people avoid getting a forum account because having to get a second different illy account seems weird and inconvenient.

Edited by Alcie - 21 Jun 2015 at 15:19
Back to Top
Captain Kindly View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 19 Aug 2011
Location: Fremorn
Status: Offline
Points: 276
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Captain Kindly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 12:36
Originally posted by ajqtrz ajqtrz wrote:

CK
I'm doing stuff on the Illyriad Post myself.  Is admitting that an act of bravery?  Gee, never thought of myself as courageous.

Is that an admittance to forum account sharing? If it is, you are in trouble.

FTR, I have posed the question of having more forum accounts than player accounts versus ToS to Rikoo. He is looking into this.

EDIT: it is obvious that 'illyriadpost' is a Stomp member, who is trying to spin his/her view about what is a silly war to begin with. To him/her I say to just declare if you want to fight, and do not invent silly excuses.


Edited by Captain Kindly - 21 Jun 2015 at 12:39
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 56789 13>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.