why isnt there talk of the war here |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 56789 13> |
| Author | ||
Janders
New Poster
Joined: 02 Jul 2014 Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 22:49 |
|
|
You are right, historic analogies are always imprecise.
What I want to say is that claiming land isn't a purely defensive/passive move.
|
||
![]() |
||
Mahaut
Wordsmith
Joined: 20 Jan 2012 Location: North West UK Status: Offline Points: 173 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 22:43 |
|
|
Janders I don't think the Native American situation is relevant.
The problem there sadly was down to two cultures fundamentally not understanding what the other meant. The Native American didn't have any experience on which to base an understanding of what was meant when an early settler purchased land from him. And the settler didn't (or probably couldn't, given it was most likely his or her own first experience of another culture) understand that the Native American had no reference. This changed quite quickly. Its quite possible - even more than likely that a large number of those land purchases were made in good faith on both sides, but we like to put people into "sides", it's lazy history but far easier. This is hardly the case here or we wouldn't be finding endless long and boring posts on the subject. I think everyone knows what is meant by land claim. Edited by Mahaut - 21 Jun 2015 at 22:44 |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Janders
New Poster
Joined: 02 Jul 2014 Status: Offline Points: 36 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 22:16 |
|
|
I wouldn't find a neighbor purchasing a plot of land in my neighborhood aggressive. But I live in a place with zoning and plots and personal property. Illy has NOT been like that.
OTOH, think of the native americans when the first europeans "bought" claims of lands from them. The idea of land ownership was foreign. Was this an aggressive act? Certainly not as aggressive as guns and swords, but it is not a passive or defensive act to claim ownership of something which previously had been communal property.
|
||
![]() |
||
Mak
New Poster
Joined: 21 Jun 2015 Location: Minnesota, USA Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 21:33 |
|
For the sake of educated discussion I must contest this "slanted" view and anecdotal example with one from the other perspective. That way you do not dominate three theaters of discussion Ajqtrz . Those with land claims are hardly men and women "waving a gun around". Nor are they individuals that are using intimidation or provocation. To stake out land and claim ownership is not an aggressive action in itself. Is purchasing or buying land a "threat" to the neighbors around you? Does it warrant an attack or fighting? You would be hard pressed to make an argument with such logic. These alliances in the Broken Lands are bartering with the community at-large to establish peaceable agreements in lands that are largely uninhabited. Many of these alliances even grandfather cities and players in these lands as an act of good faith. They are hardly "bullies" or "ruffians" with threats. Additionally, it is not an argument that STOMP escalated hostilities. Not only did they escalate, they started military engagements that were not even in the Bitter Lands. That is fact. If this was such an affront to the termed "freedom fighters" why was there a period of two months between the first land claim and fighting where no action was taken? If this was encroachment on people's rights there should have been diplomacy, discussion, or deeds taken immediately to preserve those liberties. Let us be honest with ourselves and say what this is. Chaos for the sake of chaos. Large players wanted to use their troops and raise their ratings because global events have been stale in the absence of a tournament. As someone who has watched this community for five years this follows the usual pattern of summer seasonal hostilities. People have extra time and create a false casus belli to "spice up" the server. Do not scapegoat this new trend of land claims as being immoral to the community at large. The several alliances in the south are fighting and claiming territory to ensure the future for their posterity, especially the new small population players. To rephrase your words: "You would think such a point would be so obvious that there would be no need for me to analyze the situation" For those who are sick of forum posts like this.... ![]() Edited by Mak - 21 Jun 2015 at 21:41 |
||
|
"Life is a Beautiful Struggle"-Mos Def
Former Player-Makanalani (World's End) Proud Member of Dark Blight |
||
![]() |
||
ajqtrz
Postmaster
Joined: 24 May 2014 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 500 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 18:49 |
|
|
Interesting. If I come up to you on the street and wave a gun in your face and tell you to give me all your money, and you knock me down, you are the aggressor? Intimidation, threats and/or coercion are aggressive acts in themselves. In legal terms if I threaten you, your property, or your right, and you strike first because you believe the threat to be real, it's called "provocation" and it's an acceptable defense.
Now you can argue that STOMP escalated. That is true. But the escalation was necessary because rights had already been taken from them and all of us. The right to settle in a particular spot is a right over which we are arguing. To do nothing to force the issue would have been to accept ipso facto the right to make land claims as they have already been made. If the land claimers had discussed their methods and desires and the whole issue of land claiming, and gone through the obviously long and tortured road of discussion and persuasion, and had convinced almost everybody that it would be good for the game BEFORE foisting the claims upon us, then you could argue that STOMP was out of line. But if you steal from me and I try to take back what you stole by force, it's you who have been the aggressor. You would think such a point would be so obvious that their would be no need to outline it. AJ Edited by ajqtrz - 21 Jun 2015 at 18:50 |
||
![]() |
||
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 16:06 |
|
|
Well, the topic is not talking about the war. I'm not talking about the war. I think that counts.
But yeah, alliances tend to avoid the forums when they can for stuff that could in any way reflect negatively on them, because that's just good policy. Speak softly and carry a big stick and all that.
|
||
![]() |
||
GM Rikoo
Moderator Group
Community & PR Manager Joined: 28 Mar 2014 Location: Mars Status: Offline Points: 1233 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 16:02 |
|
Get back on topic, please. We will make a post about this if you want, but bear in mind that there are many reasons we keep them separate. If you do not hear back from me, nothing has changed. If you see a post that you think is breaking the rules, report it. Thanks! GM Rikoo
|
||
|
Illyriad Community Manager / Public Relations / community@illyriad.co.uk
|
||
![]() |
||
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 15:59 |
|
|
Yeah, I'd support a mandate that forum accounts be linked to and share names with active player accounts too. However, the rules don't currently say anything about it, so there's no reason to get accusatory over it. (And Illyriad Post gets a thumbs up in my view just because I generally support anything that lets people involve themselves more in the game.)
|
||
![]() |
||
Alcie
Forum Warrior
Joined: 02 Dec 2012 Status: Offline Points: 308 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 15:14 |
|
One of illyriadpost's first posts said 'Please send your news to illyriadpost@gmail.com'. Although I don't know for sure, this sounds to me like only one person has the account login info, but others (maybe potentially anyone) asks that one person to post stuff. People often post for others on the forum (sometimes because they have no forum account themselves). I see no problem with this--not that different than asking someone in-game to do something for you. As for having multiple forum accounts.. interesting question. Since they don't have to be linked to the game accounts in any way at all, I see no reason why you couldn't have more than 1 (or even more than 2) from reading the terms of service or what you click to register a forum account. Although personally I prefer forum posts linked to real players so that I get some context. If there are 'extra' forums-specific terms of service, they should make it very clear in both the rules section and on the thing you agree with when you register for the forums. This is all very off-topic.. but almost everything in this thread is sort of off topic since 'why don't we talk about war' turned into people talking about war xD If the devs have clarification on this issue, a new thread (as well as maybe updates to the rules section wording) would be more useful than responding here. Personally I wish the forum accounts were part of the game accounts so that this wouldn't be an issue to start with... A lot of people avoid getting a forum account because having to get a second different illy account seems weird and inconvenient. Edited by Alcie - 21 Jun 2015 at 15:19 |
||
![]() |
||
Captain Kindly
Forum Warrior
Joined: 19 Aug 2011 Location: Fremorn Status: Offline Points: 276 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 Jun 2015 at 12:36 |
|
Is that an admittance to forum account sharing? If it is, you are in trouble. FTR, I have posed the question of having more forum accounts than player accounts versus ToS to Rikoo. He is looking into this. EDIT: it is obvious that 'illyriadpost' is a Stomp member, who is trying to spin his/her view about what is a silly war to begin with. To him/her I say to just declare if you want to fight, and do not invent silly excuses.
Edited by Captain Kindly - 21 Jun 2015 at 12:39 |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 56789 13> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |