| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Beecks 
Wordsmith
Joined: 03 Apr 2012
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 194
|
 Topic: Who will be next?
Posted: 14 Mar 2013 at 20:53 |
Rorgash is a character. He brings a unique voice to the forums  and Vty is my favorite Absa!
|
 |
Hadus
Postmaster
Joined: 28 Jun 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 545
|
Posted: 14 Mar 2013 at 13:56 |
|
Without villains, there can be no heroes. Think about that before we get on another tangent about "bullies".
Attitudes like Rorgash' and gameplayer's (which are both quite distinct, mind you) frustrated me greatly when I first got here. Now I realized how much color they bring to the community. While I don't think I could stand it if EVERYONE shared their attitude, having a couple troublemakers fuels rivalries and adds to the emotional investment that makes Illyriad such a unique and gratifying experience.
Edited by Hadus - 14 Mar 2013 at 13:56
|
|
|
|
Kompanion
Greenhorn
Joined: 08 Jan 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 53
|
Posted: 14 Mar 2013 at 04:18 |
|
I am proud to be a member of Dark. I was not afraid to join in the war because I personally felt like I knew which side I wanted to be on. However, with that said, there are some great people in Consone.
My personal observation is that Illy has some level of a moral value system and there are people willing to enforce these values if necessary. Try sieging or bullying a newer
player if you doubt this to be true. I am confident that Dark would not
sit idle if this were taking place in our area.
Perhaps there were members on both sides who had perceptions that bullying was taking place. I will not fight over who was right or who was wrong. I will only argue that honor is for those who chose to fight for what they believed to be right. Regardless of which side they were on.
|
|
vty
Wordsmith
Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: 14 Mar 2013 at 02:47 |
 Sisren wrote:
vty wrote:
Oh really?
Remind me what BSH did, please, I'll wait
|
The valiantly stood against egotistical bullies like you to start. 'just saying... |
I'm hardly a bully.
|
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 23:52 |
geofrey wrote:
your forgot the H |
Only one "n", but still v. funny!
Edited by Kumomoto - 13 Mar 2013 at 23:52
|
|
geofrey
Postmaster General
Joined: 31 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 21:18 |
Rorgash wrote:
Diomedes wrote:
Food for thought: The first casualty in war is truth; the second casualty is humility |
yea because the losers arent losers, we are all winners... bs |
your forgot the H
|
|
|
|
Rorgash
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 21:16 |
Diomedes wrote:
Food for thought: The first casualty in war is truth; the second casualty is humility |
yea because the losers arent losers, we are all winners... bs
|
|
scaramouche
Forum Warrior
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 432
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 20:52 |
Rorgash wrote:
Ossian wrote:
This thread is just another example of the way Alliances like [Dark] and [BSH] are looking to wreck genuine peace negotiations between the major alliances that "actually" fought in the war as opposed to those sat on the sidelines and flamed and trolled like gameplayer of [Dark] and Rorgash of [BSH]. Neither of these players can be described as valiant but they certanly give the impression of being egoistical.
I always felt that if there were any true villains in the war it was indeed the alliances like Dark and BSH who harbour players who are just out to create mischief. |
there might have been some more at the beginning i have forgotten about, they were all so weak after all, not really worth remembering. |
the mighty Rorgash...attacking " so weak" players...lol.
|
|
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
|
Diomedes
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 Mar 2012
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 208
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 20:49 |
|
Food for thought: The first casualty in war is truth; the second casualty is humility
|
|
"Walk in the way of the good, for the righteous will dwell in the land"
|
|
Halcyon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 360
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 15:40 |
Ossian wrote:
This thread is just another example of the way Alliances like [Dark] and [BSH] are looking to wreck genuine peace negotiations between the major alliances that "actually" fought in the war as opposed to those sat on the sidelines and flamed and trolled like gameplayer of [Dark] and Rorgash of [BSH]. Neither of these players can be described as valiant but they certanly give the impression of being egoistical.
I always felt that if there were any true villains in the war it was indeed the alliances like Dark and BSH who harbour players who are just out to create mischief. |
You name Dark and BSH, gameplayer and Rogrash "villains". We in Dark committed no atrocities whatsoever. We conducted strategic warfare and targeted mostly the strongest opponents we could find in our area (Vic). We fought valiant, honorable warriors like Daene, Elanor and others and spared others whom we considered a small challenge. I presume that BSH did the same.
gameplayer's troops fought in almost all our battles and tens if not hundreds of thousands of her troops were lost. She most certainly did not sit on the side lines.
Edited by Halcyon - 13 Mar 2013 at 15:42
|
|
Tweet
Who will be next?
