| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
Grego 
Postmaster
Joined: 09 May 2010
Location: Klek
Status: Offline
Points: 729
|
 Posted: 11 Mar 2013 at 17:23 |
 Auraya wrote:
Diomedes wrote:
Fortunately, I was on the true "winning" side.... namely the side that chose to stay out of the war |
^ This. +1 Dio. |
Time will tell.
|
 |
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
|
Posted: 12 Mar 2013 at 10:09 |
Auraya wrote:
Diomedes wrote:
Fortunately, I was on the true "winning" side.... namely the side that chose to stay out of the war |
^ This. +1 Dio. |
Well, it is true that traders and generally neutral alliances had a great potential of profit from the war and it is true that all the troops that were expended from both sides cost a huge chunk of time and money, there remains the benefit of all the XP (both in commanders and "XP" as in playing the game) that was gained from both sides which will be a benefit to any upcoming tournament.
One could say that the war turned gold and resources into commander XP and while this is not a direct gain, it could be quite beneficial in the lond run. 
|
|
Aha
New Poster
Joined: 12 May 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 22
|
Posted: 12 Mar 2013 at 22:21 |
|
It's more the player experience. And it's not so beneficial for the next tournament but for the next war.
|
|
vty
Wordsmith
Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 119
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 01:18 |
Oh really?
Remind me what BSH did, please, I'll wait
|
|
Sisren
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Feb 2012
Location: PA, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 09:22 |
vty wrote:
Oh really?
Remind me what BSH did, please, I'll wait
|
The valiantly stood against egotistical bullies like you to start. 'just saying...
|
|
Ossian
Forum Warrior
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 456
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 10:56 |
Sisren wrote:
vty wrote:
Oh really?
Remind me what BSH did, please, I'll wait
|
The valiantly stood against egotistical bullies like you to start.
'just saying... |
This thread is just another example of the way Alliances like [Dark] and [BSH] are looking to wreck genuine peace negotiations between the major alliances that "actually" fought in the war as opposed to those sat on the sidelines and flamed and trolled like gameplayer of [Dark] and Rorgash of [BSH]. Neither of these players can be described as valiant but they certanly give the impression of being egoistical.
I always felt that if there were any true villains in the war it was indeed the alliances like Dark and BSH who harbour players who are just out to create mischief.
|
|
Anjire
Postmaster
Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 688
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 11:43 |
|
Regarding villains: I would state that my opinion of a true villain is a player that hides behind anonymity and threatens training alliances rather than the actual alliance(s) they have a personal beef with.
|
|
|
|
Rorgash
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 14:07 |
Ossian wrote:
This thread is just another example of the way Alliances like [Dark] and [BSH] are looking to wreck genuine peace negotiations between the major alliances that "actually" fought in the war as opposed to those sat on the sidelines and flamed and trolled like gameplayer of [Dark] and Rorgash of [BSH]. Neither of these players can be described as valiant but they certanly give the impression of being egoistical.
I always felt that if there were any true villains in the war it was indeed the alliances like Dark and BSH who harbour players who are just out to create mischief. |
Well... not sure about the exact count, but the number towns i personally had troops at i think is 7, all which have been razed. might be more as this war has gone on for quite some time and there might have been some more at the beginning i have forgotten about, they were all so weak after all, not really worth remembering.
Edited by Rorgash - 13 Mar 2013 at 14:08
|
|
twilights
Postmaster
Joined: 21 May 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 915
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 14:16 |
|
geez i was more logistics and allowed others to control my troops which i think were used for strategic gains and not just for bullying. oh well some people are just totally clueless in what is actually occurring in the game. grins, but i have to admit that was a pretty good troll flame. huggsssssssssss
|
|
Halcyon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 17 Aug 2012
Location: Israel
Status: Offline
Points: 360
|
Posted: 13 Mar 2013 at 15:40 |
Ossian wrote:
This thread is just another example of the way Alliances like [Dark] and [BSH] are looking to wreck genuine peace negotiations between the major alliances that "actually" fought in the war as opposed to those sat on the sidelines and flamed and trolled like gameplayer of [Dark] and Rorgash of [BSH]. Neither of these players can be described as valiant but they certanly give the impression of being egoistical.
I always felt that if there were any true villains in the war it was indeed the alliances like Dark and BSH who harbour players who are just out to create mischief. |
You name Dark and BSH, gameplayer and Rogrash "villains". We in Dark committed no atrocities whatsoever. We conducted strategic warfare and targeted mostly the strongest opponents we could find in our area (Vic). We fought valiant, honorable warriors like Daene, Elanor and others and spared others whom we considered a small challenge. I presume that BSH did the same.
gameplayer's troops fought in almost all our battles and tens if not hundreds of thousands of her troops were lost. She most certainly did not sit on the side lines.
Edited by Halcyon - 13 Mar 2013 at 15:42
|
|
Tweet
Who will be next?