What is what?

Over all thanks, i can now go on a rampage without any worries. Cheers.

If you suffer emotional distress from playing a video game, then you are playing the wrong video game.

Your acceptance of the possible consequences is implicit in playing any game.

For example, I understand that two players in Monopoly might agree that a third cannot be given Park Place if they already have Boardwalk. This outcome might be undesirable or even inflammatory to the player holding Boardwalk, but the move is valid within the game, and by playing Monopoly that player has already accepted that collusion might happen. The third player doesn't have to agree to the move for the other two to make it.

Let me get this right, you are saying attacking players in a war game is wrong? I think perhaps you really do not understand the concept of Strategic War Game. If it is peace and quiet you want go play farmville. The developers made troops to be used in conflict. If this game was meant to be conflict free the option to build troops and diplomats and the option to use them to attack other players would not be part of the game. I could of course be wrong, but then I am still going to attack players.

asr wrote:   It has become normal to attack other players in games that it now equates as fun, if someone tells its attacking then people will say its fun. By attacking other players is we cause harm to them and their property therefore it can't be called fun. Getting satisfied by attacking others? its mental illness.  Mental illness can't be mixed up by shorter lapses, these are mental conditions what will pass after the damage is done and then we feel sorry after that and change our way to better directions. I myself use games to cure myself. What are you doing here?