| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
SirTwitchy
Greenhorn
Joined: 14 Sep 2010
Location: usa
Status: Offline
Points: 44
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 02:40 |
|
oh well this game has turned into dare I say.....Evony?
|
|
please disregard the twitch, the meds haven't kicked in yet...
|
 |
Erik Dirk
Wordsmith
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 158
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 02:38 |
First of all there currently is no crying foul as H? haven't actually done anything yet. Llyorn the question is would you have gone straight to steam rolling our cities or would you have responded only one step up. Ie assassins, thieves and blights, To which we would have weathered but not responded in kind, Afterall you couldn't honestly see us as a threat.
|
 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 02:38 |
Erik Dirk wrote:
Llyorn, I guess it's more a question of magnitude of involvement. PoS had no intention of attacking your cities or destroying towns, if we don't back down would you really refrain from siegeing our towns? Attacking troops in a siege camp, and attacking troops in a tournament isn't THAT different, where as attacking troops in the field and attempting to destroy a city is leagues apart.
Anyway, I can't see the point of continuing a war where there is no challenge Mr D's post isn't necessarily representative of PoS |
Understood. TBH I agree to an extent. If it were up to me it wouldve been just Valar and Harmless. But as I said, it wasnt up to me.
|
|
"ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
 |
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 02:38 |
|
I don't believe we have cried foul and I fully expected H to attack, I have no issue whatsoever there. Point is we stuck by our confed and I am suggesting you guys will gain even more respect if you take valar on one on one.
|
 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 02:31 |
Mr Damage wrote:
LOJ were Curse ok in attacking Valar without declaring? I know it was specifically 2 people only but still, would you say that is the same as what you have the issue with PoS is? Curse I am not making a judgement on you guys here, just a comparision. |
Mr D: I honestly dont care if someone does or doesnt declare war. That is not the issue. The issue with PoS was that it was opportunistic. They saw a way to involve themselves consequence free. Attack us or dont. Declare or dont. Matters not. But poor form to attack (siege or no) and then cry foul that we reply. Being a cofed does not exclude from consequence of action
|
|
"ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
 |
Mr Damage
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 02:21 |
|
LOJ were Curse ok in attacking Valar without declaring? I know it was specifically 2 people only but still, would you say that is the same as what you have the issue with PoS is? Curse I am not making a judgement on you guys here, just a comparision.
|
 |
Erik Dirk
Wordsmith
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 158
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 02:20 |
Llyorn, I guess it's more a question of magnitude of involvement. PoS had no intention of attacking your cities or destroying towns, if we don't back down would you really refrain from siegeing our towns? Attacking troops in a siege camp, and attacking troops in a tournament isn't THAT different, where as attacking troops in the field and attempting to destroy a city is leagues apart.
Anyway, I can't see the point of continuing a war where there is no challenge Mr D's post isn't necessarily representative of PoS
|
 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 02:11 |
|
DK: Not what Im saying.
The Dishonour is in hiding behind the technicality, not the declaration itself.
BIG difference.
Simple minded bully I may be. But at least not a coward pal.
|
|
"ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
 |
Darkwords
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1005
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 01:51 |
|
|
 |
Darkwords
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1005
|
Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 01:48 |
Lawn, what you said is its dishonourable to attack without declaring war.... Dont try and lie your way out of your dumb declaration.
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Darkwords wrote:
Have never laughed so hard, thanks for that Lawn.
To quote you.... Umm. K. So its honorable to attack without declaring war?!?
So why did you go to war with the VALAR and not CURSE, DLord or PA.
Obviously in your OH-SO honourable and sane mind, you are claiming; its more honourable to gang up on the honourable, whilst confeding with the dis-honourable.
|
Missing the point.
Declare war or dont. Its a technicality to us. But dont attack us and then expect to be free from retaliation because we 'weren't technically' in a state of war.
Because there is no honour in that.
Understand?
|
Lawn, what you said is its dishonourable to attack without declaring war.... Therefore you are fighting on the side of the dishonourable.
Dont try and lie your way out of your own dumb declaration. You will forever look the simple minded bully that you are......
.... Understand?
|
 |