| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 08:49 |
Seems like the community should require some standard of proof in cases when people claim that others are abusing the system (have multiple accounts, sitting inappropriately, etc.). I saw a chat fail that tends to confirm that Zork is indeed being sat as described, but I would hope that in general we would ask for some evidence of such claims.
I say that as someone who has been publicly accused of violating the ToS by multi-accounting with absolutely no offer of proof. (Which is understandable because I only have one account and a rather well-known alt, and thus it would be impossible to "prove.") I don't think it's OK to question another player's integrity without offering evidence.
I'm wondering what others think -- is it OK to make allegations of this sort without offering proof, or should we as a community ask people to back up their accusations or stay silent?
|
 |
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 05:03 |
This issue is no longer about Borg sitting Zork2010. Borg is also a sat account (probably same sitter as Zork2010). They will both be gone soon...
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
 |
Hora
Postmaster
Joined: 10 May 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 839
|
Posted: 06 Aug 2011 at 23:46 |
Hmmm.... I really should find me a inactive account to sit for, so I could join the fun...  Anyone about to leave and to give me his sitting rights?
|
 |
Gemley
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586
|
Posted: 06 Aug 2011 at 23:11 |
|
grabs popcorn
|
|
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
|
 |
The Duke
Forum Warrior
Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 464
|
Posted: 06 Aug 2011 at 19:47 |
|
Interesting, i support the rule change as well. And as far as the upcoming wars- I think with the rule change, a large battle is inevitable. people looking to rid themselves of massive armies or other accounts altogether
|
|
"Our generation has had no Great Depression, no Great War. Our war is spiritual. Our depression is our lives."
|
 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 05 Aug 2011 at 22:48 |
Kurfist wrote:
I should make a few T-shirts for this war, you know spread some joy out of the blood of your fallen troops and rubble of your cities. How's this? "Got lorre?" :D
| chuckles.
|
|
"ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
 |
Kurfist
Postmaster
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 824
|
Posted: 05 Aug 2011 at 22:38 |
|
Why are we debating on this? if lorre and S7B want to duke it out, have at it!
On a side note, this topic needs some happiness.
I should make a few T-shirts for this war, you know spread some joy out of the blood of your fallen troops and rubble of your cities.
How's this? "Got lorre?" :D
Edit: Italics and pink font
Edited by Kurfist - 05 Aug 2011 at 22:39
|
|
Patience is a virtue, resource giving is a sin
|
 |
Klandor
Greenhorn
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 50
|
Posted: 05 Aug 2011 at 17:26 |
To a greater degree, I seriously agree with the Rule Change. The ability to Sit an account indefinitely, is one of the ways that some people are getting around the 2 account limit.
"Sure, I'll create 2 accounts and build them up, and, on each account, I'll Sit for 2 more people who have left the game, and that way I control SIX accounts..."
If Zork2010 truly left the game and left the account to Borg, with the intent for Borg to run the account, then turn over the bloody account. As Zork left the game, I hear, over or around a year ago, Borg still working the account as his own NOW, a year later, is a little ridiculous.
Klandor
|
 |
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 05 Aug 2011 at 17:03 |
Darkwords wrote:
On a side note is Zork a purely sat account (ie abandoned with a sitter)?
Could this be the first of many wars due to the change in system, where-by sitting will be limited?
|
I for one hope it is. Illy needs some action.
|
 |
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 05 Aug 2011 at 15:35 |
Darkwords wrote:
On a side note is Zork a purely sat account (ie abandoned with a sitter)?
Could this be the first of many wars due to the change in system, where-by sitting will be limited?
|
yea thats the reason since it will be limited or whatever he figured well why not attack the guys i dun like and stay out of shot
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
 |