Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - war {P A} vs  S&B
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic Closedwar {P A} vs S&B

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 31>
Author
The Duke View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Aug 2011 at 19:47
Interesting, i support the rule change as well. And as far as the upcoming wars- I think with the rule change, a large battle is inevitable. people looking to rid themselves of massive armies or other accounts altogether
"Our generation has had no Great Depression, no Great War. Our war is spiritual. Our depression is our lives."
Back to Top
Gemley View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Aug 2011 at 23:11
grabs popcorn
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
Back to Top
Hora View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 May 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 839
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06 Aug 2011 at 23:46
Hmmm.... I really should find me a inactive account to sit for, so I could join the fun... Confused

Anyone about to leave and to give me his sitting rights? Tongue
Back to Top
SunStorm View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 05:03
This issue is no longer about Borg sitting Zork2010.  Borg is also a sat account (probably same sitter as Zork2010).  They will both be gone soon...




"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR

Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 08:49
Seems like the community should require some standard of proof in cases when people claim that others are abusing the system (have multiple accounts, sitting inappropriately, etc.).  I saw a chat fail that tends to confirm that Zork is indeed being sat as described, but I would hope that in general we would ask for some evidence of such claims.

I say that as someone who has been publicly accused of violating the ToS by multi-accounting with absolutely no offer of proof.  (Which is understandable because I only have one account and a rather well-known alt, and thus it would be impossible to "prove.")  I don't think it's OK to question another player's integrity without offering evidence.

I'm wondering what others think -- is it OK to make allegations of this sort without offering proof, or should we as a community ask people to back up their accusations or stay silent?
Back to Top
Celebcalen View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 18 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 288
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 09:44
I think Rill is right. You should not make accusations of rule breaking without proof of what you are saying. You should really report it to the GM's. How about if a person makes an accusation and has not provided proof to the forum or reported it to the admin team within say 3 days - then the community blocks them on Chat or something.

Back to Top
Sgt..Shanks View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Location: BRITAIN
Status: Offline
Points: 56
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 10:34
The mail exists, I have seen it.
Back to Top
Nokigon View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Historian

Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 10:49
I have as well.
And even if I hadn't, the multitude pf people the mail is genuine would be enough to persuade me.


Edited by Nokigon - 07 Aug 2011 at 10:50
Back to Top
Aneirin View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 186
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 15:19
Originally posted by Nokigon Nokigon wrote:

I have as well.
And even if I hadn't, the multitude pf people the mail is genuine would be enough to persuade me.

That's not good enough Nokigon. 

Lets see the proof!
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 16:08
You make it sound like a posting of text that forms the content of an alleged email is somehow irrefutable proof.  Nok is right; multiple witnesses claiming its validity really is just as solid a source of evidence.
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now."
- HonoredMule
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 31>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.