| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
The Duke 
Forum Warrior
Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 464
|
 Posted: 06 Aug 2011 at 19:47 |
|
Interesting, i support the rule change as well. And as far as the upcoming wars- I think with the rule change, a large battle is inevitable. people looking to rid themselves of massive armies or other accounts altogether
|
|
"Our generation has had no Great Depression, no Great War. Our war is spiritual. Our depression is our lives."
|
 |
Gemley
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586
|
Posted: 06 Aug 2011 at 23:11 |
|
grabs popcorn
|
|
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
|
|
Hora
Postmaster
Joined: 10 May 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 839
|
Posted: 06 Aug 2011 at 23:46 |
Hmmm.... I really should find me a inactive account to sit for, so I could join the fun...  Anyone about to leave and to give me his sitting rights? 
|
|
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 05:03 |
This issue is no longer about Borg sitting Zork2010. Borg is also a sat account (probably same sitter as Zork2010). They will both be gone soon...
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 08:49 |
Seems like the community should require some standard of proof in cases when people claim that others are abusing the system (have multiple accounts, sitting inappropriately, etc.). I saw a chat fail that tends to confirm that Zork is indeed being sat as described, but I would hope that in general we would ask for some evidence of such claims.
I say that as someone who has been publicly accused of violating the ToS by multi-accounting with absolutely no offer of proof. (Which is understandable because I only have one account and a rather well-known alt, and thus it would be impossible to "prove.") I don't think it's OK to question another player's integrity without offering evidence.
I'm wondering what others think -- is it OK to make allegations of this sort without offering proof, or should we as a community ask people to back up their accusations or stay silent? |
|
Celebcalen
Forum Warrior
Joined: 18 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 288
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 09:44 |
|
I think Rill is right. You should not make accusations of rule breaking without proof of what you are saying. You should really report it to the GM's. How about if a person makes an accusation and has not provided proof to the forum or reported it to the admin team within say 3 days - then the community blocks them on Chat or something.
|
|
Sgt..Shanks
Greenhorn
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Location: BRITAIN
Status: Offline
Points: 56
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 10:34 |
|
The mail exists, I have seen it.
|
|
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 10:49 |
I have as well.
And even if I hadn't, the multitude pf people the mail is genuine would be enough to persuade me.
Edited by Nokigon - 07 Aug 2011 at 10:50
|
|
Aneirin
Wordsmith
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 186
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 15:19 |
 Nokigon wrote:
I have as well.
And even if I hadn't, the multitude pf people the mail is genuine would be enough to persuade me. |
That's not good enough Nokigon.
Lets see the proof!
|
|
HonoredMule
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
|
Posted: 07 Aug 2011 at 16:08 |
|
You make it sound like a posting of text that forms the content of an alleged email is somehow irrefutable proof. Nok is right; multiple witnesses claiming its validity really is just as solid a source of evidence.
|
|
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now."
- HonoredMule
|
|
Tweet
war {P A} vs S&B