Vaults

LOL Jack,

For you to find me stupid is flattering indeed.  I have never come accross someone so idiotic in my life.

Nor have I ever met anyone stupid enough to try and criticize someone that agrees with them.

Your post still does not prove any fact that you are a game designer, you are merely a wannabie who has taken some classes.

Well this entire thread has become pretty pathetic anyway, so I am gonna stop clicking into it to check whatever inane responce you post.

Have fun mate.

Calico_Jack wrote: I am well able, but while keeping it in this topic and having a bad memory and nothing remembering who says what i which post in other topics, here you are ok with the vaults being useless for anyone above 2k in size, instead of enjoying the idea that your aults that you have would be able to protect maybe 100k basic and 2k adv in the future, and not placing a argument for this and instead saything this: " your entire argument (and not just in this post) is based on an attitude of I play this way, so I want this.  I would advise that you play this game for a while longer and actually adapt your gameplay to the game itself, rather than continuously requesting the game is changed to fit your personnal ambitions. "

That was after you replied with an insult to my post in which I agreed that the ammount protected should be increased and even laid out how it could be done, but stated that even if it isn't done the vault should not be removed as some people, including myself *(and sunstorm going by his post above) are able to use it to our advantage.

Which is exactly why I feel you are incapable of a debate, as unless someone agrees 100% with you, then you go on an offensive against them.  Perhaps you have simply not learnt the true meaning of the word debate yet.

Calico_Jack wrote: I will as said I argument FOR my idea, and its your job to argument against it or with it, dont be asking your opponent to agree with you or be too kind until you mange to convince him that you are correct

I am not, but that is all you seem able to do.

Calico_Jack wrote:  and so far your argument has been "Im ok with it as it is"  I dont understand, How am i to respond to this in any other way then try to change your mind to agree with me?

No it hasn't, try reading my posts before you go on an offensive.  The only way in which I have disagreed with you is that I do not support your call for the vault to be removed from the game.

However, you seem so intollerant and selfish that you are unwilling to accept that a structure which other people use should remain an option, simply because you have not found a practicle way of using it yourself, to fit in with your game play.

Calico_Jack wrote: Which is the point of an argument or debate

A pathetic argument yes, but not a debate.

Calico_Jack wrote: and the games.. well living in Sweden where well there aint many companies i have just taken factory works and the stuff instead for the past year since i got out of school, during school i helped deisgn maybe 10-15 smaller games, but due to time limits of 2 days to 2 weeks and a 1-3 man crew they are crap in my eyes  but my 3 years of school i feel gives me inside knowledge of how games are made since i have been on every side of it making them.

LOL.... In that case, I as Prime Minister (an ex-politics student), Cheif Architect (for that read qualified architect) and an English / Chinese interpreter, think you exagerate matters a little.

Or you could just use the "Ryelle method" and not have any advanced resources to steal ...

I am well able, but while keeping it in this topic and having a bad memory and nothing remembering who says what i which post in other topics, here you are ok with the vaults being useless for anyone above 2k in size, instead of enjoying the idea that your aults that you have would be able to protect maybe 100k basic and 2k adv in the future, and not placing a argument for this and instead saything this:

Darkwords wrote: Perhaps you should actually read my posts. ;)