Drejan,
let me point out some little inconguencies in what you said and what your alliance did. I really hate to be so pedantic but it seems you (and Belargyle and Flipper and GNU (today on GC)) keep trying to pass this as normal, when it is not.
let's begin:
1. "we could have razed lot lot more if not for CristinaZah". ---> Of course Cristina and Kurdruk made a wonderful work. We are lucky they are in VALAR. BUT dlord didn't raze lot lot more because, at a certain moment, you realized that a lot of people was considering dlord a bully alliance. I know, you say that now everything stopped because now there's formally peace. We'll never know the truth.
However, here there are some quotes from your friends that perhaps you consider normal:
Belargyle: "Dots, we gave you an out to save 2 of your cities, with no future hostilities". so 7 city razed, very merciful Belargyle. Thank you.
Filpper: "You would have us stop attacking someone who INSISTS on remaining with an alliance we are at war with? This would leave us open to attacks from this account". I'm still asking myself how did I dare to INSIST on staying in VALAR... of course this was referred to all in VALAR.
Kilotov: "hey large ham, yer just a war causality". this just doesn't deserve any comment.
2. "he (referring to me) has not been sieged out of the game at all". ---> it's true, but I still think that it's not thanks to dlord
3. "(if it's dots who is writing)" ---> the fact that I'm an active player and that I post in this thread is really difficult to accept for dlord. Perhaps because I messed up your plans to raze 8 legendary cities like jackals?
dots and this account are the same person. Deal with it. I'll try also to proof it: on my second post on page 24 I explained what dots did in the last months, had access to all dots' igms and could give any detail about past events. Since this is an online game, you will never know if I'm the original dots or a person who had his password for months. However this is not your business and, please, read the thread: by reading it u could have a very strong hint about I've said
4. "For a world war this was a joke so please stop flaming and talking of bullies". ---> perhaps this was a joke compared what u've seen before (hey, you seemed Rutger Hauer in Blade Runner when he says: "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships..."), but in this joke you played the bullies and jackals, all in one. Do you have different opinion? ok, everybody, including other players, have his/her own
Last consideration:
All of your looting and semplicistic reasonings (SirBucketz' "no armies=inactive" and "if the reply is 'yes'=account sitted", flipper's "no post in the forum for months + new forum account created=An interesting change in community face that is", belargyle using a scout report from a destroyed city (of course generated before its destruction) to proof that I was building troops in other cities, your's "if it's dots who is writing" without even reading some of the latest posts) made me waste an enormous quantity of time and, yes, wasted quite a lot of my real money. So I hope this, at least, will help dlord generate less basic thoughts such as: if a player has no presence in forums and replies with few words perhaps he has got few time to play and prefers to sit his account.
Tweet
VALAR seeking terms
Topic Options
Celebcalen wrote:
