| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
The_Dude 
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
 Posted: 01 Oct 2011 at 04:12 |
I have NEVER claimed to speak for the coalition. In fact, I have always stated otherwise.
So, SJ. I say to you directly: You Lie.
I have offered to speak to the coalition on behalf of VALAR if Azreal asked me in PM. I have repeated that offer many times. I have not received a PM from Az.
In the meantime, SJ, you declared war on 45 alliances. Including DEVS and most of whom nothing to do with anything.
|
 |
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 23:03 |
|
Screw it, I am off to play munchkin and have a few drinks. Tally Ho! Til the morrow!
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:52 |
 Rill wrote:
I second Lorre! |
By Lorre's logic you should have started your own thread to voice your agreement.
I will say this thread has been helpful for me, and I am sure many others as to some of the real motives behind this war.
Would you be willing to answer the same question posed to Llyorn and H? on behalf of mCrows?
|
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:42 |
|
I second Lorre!
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:41 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
No you weren't and that's why they didn't.
|
Seriously? You are a mentalist now and have the ability to prove intention? Sheesh.
U! NO U! U! NO U!.....ad infinitum (Latin, HEY LOOK AT ME!)
Take it how you will then, seemed pretty clear to me and I bet others too.
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
In a simplified answer: partly. |
Good Lord that was like Water from a Rock. Even Job himself would have been denied entry into the promised land over that one.
Fair answer, I should have added "partly" too.
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Didn't you get that hug?
|
I don't have arms.....oh, and I ate all the pies, so much so that hugging me is impossible without 30 to 40 long armed individuals on your side. Or in H?'s case, 5 or 6.
|
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:39 |
StJude wrote:
Tordenkaffen wrote:
Anything that involves another player and military units. Not counting diplomacy attacks.
|
Nah Torden, sorry I was trying to make a point. I will let the diplomat one slide given our history :P
Retaliation is expected. My objections are this.
1.) I would prefer players not beat up on players significantly smaller than them militarily. i.e. Declare they will wipe them to 0 pop.
I don't have the pop size however to enforce that opinion.
2.) Players like Amroth, Lorre and Lawn (simply because it wrecks my head trying to spell it like a welshman) put on their big boy panties and not go sociopathic in game when a player mouths off to them.
|
back to the valar reaching out part or how this thread is named you have made ur own thread for the above things go place it there please!
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
|
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:33 |
StJude wrote:
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Jude: Do you honestly expect anyone to believe you were o' so starry-eyed inquiring as to whether TD speaks for the coalition. Lets call that one rhetorical. |
Since I was inquiring, I would expect any rational non trolling individual to at least recognise it was an inquiry. |
No you weren't and that's why they didn't.
StJude wrote:
Was H? attacking VALAR because they harbored two players accused of being trolls, myself and ATH? |
In a simplified answer: partly.
StJude wrote:
I await your long winded, trolling and evasive non-answer. |
Didn't you get that hug?
|
|
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:33 |
Tordenkaffen wrote:
Anything that involves another player and military units. Not counting diplomacy attacks.
|
Nah Torden, sorry I was trying to make a point. I will let the diplomat one slide given our history :P
Retaliation is expected. My objections are this.
1.) I would prefer players not beat up on players significantly smaller than them militarily. i.e. Declare they will wipe them to 0 pop.
I don't have the pop size however to enforce that opinion.
2.) Players like Amroth, Lorre and Lawn (simply because it wrecks my head trying to spell it like a welshman) put on their big boy panties and not go sociopathic in game when a player mouths off to them.
|
|
StJude
Postmaster
Joined: 12 Jun 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 568
|
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:21 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Jude: Do you honestly expect anyone to believe you were o' so starry-eyed inquiring as to whether TD speaks for the coalition. Lets call that one rhetorical. |
Since I was inquiring, I would expect any rational non trolling individual to at least recognise it was an inquiry.
Would you clarify rhetorical? I take it to mean that yes, TD was speaking on your behalf.
You may of course redefine the word. Either way, you are still avoiding the question.
Actually two questions, but let me try and make this simple for you.
Was H? attacking VALAR because they harbored two players accused of being trolls, myself and ATH?
I await your long winded, trolling and evasive non-answer.
Edited by StJude - 30 Sep 2011 at 22:22
|
|
Tordenkaffen
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 821
|
Posted: 30 Sep 2011 at 22:19 |
|
Anything that involves another player and military units. Not counting diplomacy attacks.
|
|
"FYI - if you had any balls you'd be posting under your in-game name." - KP
|
|
Tweet
VALAR seeking terms