Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - United Alliance as Illyriad's United Nation
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedUnited Alliance as Illyriad's United Nation

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
KarL Aegis View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 20 Aug 2010
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 287
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Oct 2010 at 12:58
Morals mean nothing when money is involved. Just refuse to trade witht them. A boycott/embargo if you will.
I am not amused.
Back to Top
Zangi View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Oct 2010 at 14:17
If the UA forms, someone needs to form a counter coalition.

And then a 3rd coalition.  And a 4th.
Back to Top
Borg View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2010
Location: oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Oct 2010 at 18:36
i would think a counter coalition would be created almost immediatly. those that have agrudge with the original members of the first coalition would see a need to have thier own. an "opec" type of group would evolve. the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Oct 2010 at 20:35
Suddenly "coalition" sounds more like the confederation concept already built into the game.
Back to Top
Borg View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 28 Sep 2010
Location: oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 4
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2010 at 12:52
yes, but you can still attack a coalition member if he pisses you off
Back to Top
Zangi View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 15 Jul 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 295
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Oct 2010 at 15:32
Coalition, people working together for a preferred outcome to an objective.  Doesn't mean they need to butt in on the little tiffs that coalition members get into outside of that objective.

Confederation though, generally should mean that both sides will militarily back each other and stuff. 

Though I believe a few alliances are just using it as a 'trade pact' and/or 'bloatware' to make it look like they have more backing then they really do have.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.