Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Unintended Consequences
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Unintended Consequences

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 7>
Author
Brandmeister View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Brandmeister Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Unintended Consequences
    Posted: 17 Mar 2016 at 14:11
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

I think the bigger point that is in his example it would take 9 cities to support that 1 super city.  So the player that just used all 10 of his cities would crush him.

Exactly. One crazy theoretical city at 800% is worth 9 standard barracks. Except a 9 city account wouldn't run 0% sovereignty on each city. With the normal 150-200%, the typical 9 city account would crush that hyper-specialized account by a factor of 2.5-3x.

I find this 800% number to be absurd. 20x sov 5 would be 500%, and that is the absolute maximum you could build. The sov costs would be astronomical for the basic resources. You would never, ever be able to obtain and then ship in enough basic resources to support that. The 800% number vs 500% also assumes finding a solid block of +3% military sov, which is only possible in a very few rare locations in the tundra or desert.

Again, no offense to ajqtrz, but why are we accepting theoretical city configurations from a player who doesn't understand or use sovereignty? Have any of you ever seen a 20x5 city that produces items or units? It would be a stunt, not a real city. I run an 8x4, 12x3 city on all +8% sov, and any more than that would require shipping in tremendous amounts of basic resources. The cost doubles at every level. You would need at least 2-4 accounts supporting that one account just to keep things at break even, and shuttling resources around would drive you crazy.
Back to Top
Pellinell View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 298
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Pellinell Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2016 at 13:09
BS. Ive never bought prestige and there are few with larger armies. One can make plenty trading and harvesting/mining to pay for large armies.
Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote DeathDealer89 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2016 at 06:17
I think the bigger point that is in his example it would take 9 cities to support that 1 super city.  So the player that just used all 10 of his cities would crush him.
Back to Top
Bobtron View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2015
Location: Canton
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bobtron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2016 at 05:43
Originally posted by ajqtrz ajqtrz wrote:

Having made the mistake mentioned above I went back and re-did the analysis of my claim that it is possible to "p2w."  What I found was that, even with a 20 building limit is is possible to get to over 800% unit production AND do so at a cost of about 5 million gold a day.  Supplies would have to be sent on a schedule but it can be done. 

On the other hand, I doubt the coordination could be maintained for long as it would take very well spaced deliveries to the local storage buildings to keep things running smoothly and that would take more than one person committed to the effort.  In the end the production of 100k spears would take about 36days (if my memory serves me right) and that isn't too bad.

So while I still maintain it is possible, if it is done it would have to be done by a very organized and disciplined alliance with the desire to "p2w."

AJ

PS.  If you want the numbers they can be supplied.



I'm going to trust that you did your calculations right, that 5 million gold per day can get 800% unit production, with 100k spears in a month or so. However, from my experience, non-paying players can also easily get 5 million gold per day, thus discrediting the idea that only paying players can "p2w" and do what is written above.

In 2015, I used to own an arterium mine, and while operating below full capacity, I could get 3 mining trips per day, each with 100 miners. So that works out to be 200 arterium per day.  I also had several specialized swordsmiths, enough to build 300 war axes from the arterium daily. Back then, war axes sold for around 14k each, working out to be 4.2 million per day*. This was from an underdeveloped city of only ~4,000 pop. Once the mine is maxed out on capacity, profits would be over 6 million per day. Furthermore, this is only using several of the city's 20 plots,  once all other plots are utilized effectively, more money on top of that 6 million could be gotten.

Therefore, a player with 2 accounts, one making money as described above, and the other churning out troops, it would be more than possible to accomplish what "p2w"ers could do.

(You may say that arterium is scarce and only available to a few. But you could also easily accomplish 5 million per day with any other crafted equipment, like plainsmen armour, or animal-scale armour)

I believe a more effective argument against "p2w" would  be the ability to buy more equipment from the market, rather than sov costs.

*costs of basic equipment like swords are negligible




Edited by Bobtron - 17 Mar 2016 at 05:46
I support the Undying Flame!
Back to Top
Sun Tzu View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 32
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sun Tzu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2016 at 04:05
Yep, a typo slipped by me.  Sadly such typos are the hardest to spot, much harder than grammar problems I think.

Thus, it would be interesting to figure out how many of my mistakes are just typos and how many are actually incorrect grammar or syntax.  I suspect typos cover most but not all.
-ajacjizz

wtf? are you an actual real person cus im having trouble understanding how an actual human being can think the way you do.....  im sure youll give me a story bout how as a small child you were prone to debate with yourself, something that is quite commonplace, till bout 11 or 12 or so.  however as a grown college educated man and professor of all things, id think youd have more experience with what it is that you choose to debate about.  
SHUT UP OR I WILL SHUT IT FOR YOU.
Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Mar 2016 at 22:39
100k spears in 36 days will not win much of anything.  Unless you were fighting me, but my armies are pathetic.
Back to Top
ajqtrz View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 24 May 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 500
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ajqtrz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Mar 2016 at 22:38
Having made the mistake mentioned above I went back and re-did the analysis of my claim that it is possible to "p2w."  What I found was that, even with a 20 building limit is is possible to get to over 800% unit production AND do so at a cost of about 5 million gold a day.  Supplies would have to be sent on a schedule but it can be done. 

On the other hand, I doubt the coordination could be maintained for long as it would take very well spaced deliveries to the local storage buildings to keep things running smoothly and that would take more than one person committed to the effort.  In the end the production of 100k spears would take about 36days (if my memory serves me right) and that isn't too bad.

So while I still maintain it is possible, if it is done it would have to be done by a very organized and disciplined alliance with the desire to "p2w."

AJ

PS.  If you want the numbers they can be supplied.

Back to Top
ajqtrz View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 24 May 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 500
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ajqtrz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Mar 2016 at 22:35
Originally posted by Dungshoveleux Dungshoveleux wrote:

All this reads like Mr Logic from Viz...


Who is "Mr Logic from Viz?"

Aj
Back to Top
ajqtrz View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 24 May 2014
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 500
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ajqtrz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 Mar 2016 at 22:32
Originally posted by Tensmoor Tensmoor wrote:

Originally posted by ajqtrz ajqtrz wrote:

Originally posted by Tensmoor Tensmoor wrote:

I find his use of large words quite amusing when coupled with incorrect sentences. Unfortunately the amusement is not enough to encourage me to wade through it all.


You are probably correct that I occasionally do use incorrect grammar and syntax.  If you have found a case of such, do try to be specific as I'm always in the mood for improvement and one cannot improve much is one is unwilling to see his or her errors or if, being blind to them, is willing to be shown what others plainly see.  I'm pretty familiar with that failure at this moment, so do let me know of what sentence or sentences you refer.

Thanks,

AJ

I would suggest you start with your post above and (carefully) analyze your use of words. If you want a more specific case then please try to spot the error in this snippet.
Quote one cannot improve much is one is unwilling to see his or her errors




Yep, a typo slipped by me.  Sadly such typos are the hardest to spot, much harder than grammar problems I think.

Thus, it would be interesting to figure out how many of my mistakes are just typos and how many are actually incorrect grammar or syntax.  I suspect typos cover most but not all.

As for the "wading through it all" it may be necessary to do more editing, but I do believe, generally speaking, my writing is not repetitive.  Which means I'm only saying what I wish to say and not much else.

AJ
Back to Top
Tensmoor View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 07 Apr 2015
Location: Scotland
Status: Online
Points: 1579
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tensmoor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Mar 2016 at 13:22
Originally posted by ajqtrz ajqtrz wrote:

Originally posted by Tensmoor Tensmoor wrote:

I find his use of large words quite amusing when coupled with incorrect sentences. Unfortunately the amusement is not enough to encourage me to wade through it all.


You are probably correct that I occasionally do use incorrect grammar and syntax.  If you have found a case of such, do try to be specific as I'm always in the mood for improvement and one cannot improve much is one is unwilling to see his or her errors or if, being blind to them, is willing to be shown what others plainly see.  I'm pretty familiar with that failure at this moment, so do let me know of what sentence or sentences you refer.

Thanks,

AJ

I would suggest you start with your post above and (carefully) analyze your use of words. If you want a more specific case then please try to spot the error in this snippet.
Quote one cannot improve much is one is unwilling to see his or her errors


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 7>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.