Unimportant Food |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | |
Tamaeon
Wordsmith
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Location: Centrum Status: Offline Points: 152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 20:57 |
|
@Brandmeister
There you go. If you lower your tax rate to 35% you should be able to claim some lvl3 sovereignty. Of course this should only be done while you build up your armies. Once you reach your target army size, you can then switch all sovs to food and increase your taxes to around 75%. That's how most of us manage very large armies.
|
|
|
"How happy is the blameless vestal's lot! The world forgetting, by the world forgot. Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind! Each prayer accepted, and each wish resigned."
|
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 20:20 |
|
I run 65% in most tournament-ready cities. 50% right now, as I am changing some city layouts and needed the resources.
|
|
![]() |
|
Tamaeon
Wordsmith
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Location: Centrum Status: Offline Points: 152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 19:55 |
|
+1 to @Rill and @Anjire.
What tax rate are you running @Brandmeister?
|
|
|
"How happy is the blameless vestal's lot! The world forgetting, by the world forgot. Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind! Each prayer accepted, and each wish resigned."
|
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 19:31 |
|
I have never built a Chancery of Estates, that's why I asked. My bottleneck is never the gold and research point cost of extra sov. It's the basic resources consumed per hour. It didn't seem worth cutting a small part of the gold and RP cost on half of my sov (I use twenty sov 2 during building phases, and CoE only modifies the first level), at the expense of basics.
|
|
![]() |
|
Anjire
Postmaster
Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Status: Offline Points: 688 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 19:26 |
|
I did extensive experimentation with regards to the Chancery including claiming the max # of sovs for one city and a total of 500 sovereign squares overall just to do it. My final conclusion was: books were always the better option to buy and convert up to a price of ~2000 gold before the Chancery would be a worthwhile investment.
Additionally, my city configurations (7 food w/various 3 resource)per Albatross' suggestion allowed for the following troop level support during non-war time only running negatives in research and with ~250% troop recruitment bonus depending on how lazy/motivated I was. t2 spear city 108K t1 bow city 108K t2 sword city 72K t2 cavalry city 54K At the start of the war, I believe only one city was actually at full troop levels with the rest between 60-80%. I had min/maxed it further to allow 84K swords to be supported with only a negative in research using 4 military discount buildings. This was my capital so it had the +10% to food production discovery. I had 10 cities with 9 dedicated to full military and the 10th running Nature's bounty giving 22% bonus food to all cities and 5 other alliance member cities. This 10th city was still able to maintain a troop level = to at least 1/2 of the above stats. There are many pro's and con's to such a set up that I won't go into at this time. This fit my play style and if I were ever to play again under the current rule set I would run a similar build. Mind you, I would also make sure to Exodus 7 foods on top of mountain squares for the added defensive bonus bet you can also guess which race I would choose. ~Anjire
|
|
![]() |
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 6903 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 19:21 |
|
Since you can only build 20 sov buildings, it's useless for production purposes to claim more than 20 sov squares. There might be other reasons to do so, such as preventing settlement. (Or, as Anjire did, just for the fun of it.)
|
|
![]() |
|
Tamaeon
Wordsmith
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Location: Centrum Status: Offline Points: 152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 18:36 |
|
@Albatross Spot on, no additional comment needed. Disagree with 3, 4 You don't need to build a town on a 7 food plot to afford 3 upkeep discount buildings. I would advise against building four military discount buildings unless you intend to accumulate very large sums of troops (100k+) in a city. Reason being that the effective savings provided by each subsequent upkeep discount building is reduced by 50%; so the actual discounts will translate to...
That extra 3.75% discount would only be justified in cases of an extremely high gold upkeep. To put this into perspective... you'd be saving a mere 3750 gold p/hour on a total upkeep cost of 100k gold p/hour. Which is the approximate upkeep cost of a 50k T2 cavalry army. Strongly disagree with 5 As said above... WARNING: the Chancery of Estates only provides discounts to level 1 sovs. Any higher and it will be burning your resources for nothing. Only build this if you're in some kind of sov battle far away, or plan to claim more than 20 lvl 1 sov squares. It makes no sense to claim 50x lvl1 sov for military production, so the chancery is a definitive no-no for military cities. I remember vaguely that Anjire did an experiment claiming 50 squares... there should be info and screenshots somewhere on the forums. Edited by Tamaeon - 12 Jan 2015 at 18:39 |
|
|
"How happy is the blameless vestal's lot! The world forgetting, by the world forgot. Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind! Each prayer accepted, and each wish resigned."
|
|
![]() |
|
Tamaeon
Wordsmith
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Location: Centrum Status: Offline Points: 152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 18:06 |
Warning: watch out when building the chancery of estates, that building only lowers the cost of sov level 1!
|
|
|
"How happy is the blameless vestal's lot! The world forgetting, by the world forgot. Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind! Each prayer accepted, and each wish resigned."
|
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 17:46 |
|
I am aware of people subsidizing during tournaments.
If the 3-plot is the limiting factor, then isn't a 4-plot 33% better? If you picked up a city square with a 6 in the major discount building resource, wouldn't that enable you to build 1-2 cost reducers without much sacrifice? How do you subsidize between cities? If the 3-plot is deeply negative, doesn't that mean that the other resource plots are producing close to 0 because you are maximizing sov? |
|
![]() |
|
Albatross
Postmaster General
Joined: 11 May 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1118 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Jan 2015 at 16:29 |
|
I did some cursory calculation a couple of years ago. Although I don't have the calculations to present as evidence here now, I can outline my conclusions:
Summary points:
If you take all the above into account when settling your new military town, you'll likely get the best result. Example: http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/#/World/Map/-173/229/6 Your mileage will differ. I'd be interested to see if anyone else runs deficits (and supply from elsewhere) in order to specialize effectively.
Edited by Albatross - 12 Jan 2015 at 16:35 |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |