Tournaments and War - Proposal

Going to war after a tourney could be a huge advantage and someone even suggested that we should use that tactic in the future. It makes competing in tourneys risky so that's why I suggested a 30 day truce.  

QUOTE=eowan the short]http://illywarmonger.blogspot.co.uk/2017/03/yellow-is-new-red.html

If someone has an issue with you then them declaring war or not is irrelevant. They can attack you just as easily with out a declaration as with one.
Going to war with someone after a tourney, imo, is a pretty cheap move in the same way as it would be to declare on someone right after they have been to war with someone else.
However, I also think that if you are going to war then you need to seize every advantage you can so I can see why people do it and would probably do it myself if I was ever put in that situation.[/QUOTE]

Edited by Fanuidhol - 09 Jul 2017 at 02:31

Baby need a baba?

Fanuidhol wrote: It makes competing in tourneys risky

 

Hobblez wrote: I propose a 30 day truce from any tournament activity after a war. If your alliance is involved in a war, then you can not compete in a tourney for 30 days after the peace declaration. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, do you realize how dumb it sounds?

Actually that could be interesting. Set up an alliance with your alt then declare war on all the other alliances and have the tourney all to yourself

You're kidding right? 

Tensmoor wrote: Hobblez wrote: I propose a 30 day truce from any tournament activity after a war. If your alliance is involved in a war, then you can not compete in a tourney for 30 days after the peace declaration. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, do you realize how dumb it sounds? Actually that could be interesting. Set up an alliance with your alt then declare war on all the other alliances and have the tourney all to yourself