Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Tournament VII - Champions Return - Rules/Prizes
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedTournament VII - Champions Return - Rules/Prizes

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678910 17>
Author
Anjire View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 688
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2013 at 20:08
That aspect of diplomacy has yet to be implemented. 

Back to Top
Sirius View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 31 Jan 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 54
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 Apr 2013 at 20:05
Can assassins attack encamping commanders? I've sent many assassins against armies occupying a portal square; although I only received successful reports no effect was ever visible.

Someone knows if assassins have been disabled during the tourney, if they still don't work against occupying armies or if it can be a NAP/confed issue?
Back to Top
Mr Damage View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 598
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 19:41
KP dont forget those 2nd,3rd and 4th alliances were in a tournament around the beginning of the war and H weren't the only ones in the war either. All parties are weakened in truth and you guys are indeed performing well as expected. We will always disagree on the numbers per side in the war, doesn't matter now its over. Best of luck with the remainder of the Tournament.
Back to Top
geofrey View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 18:45
Originally posted by Anjire Anjire wrote:

I will take a great deal of the blame for our "low" participation in the last tournament.  

I was very vocal about H? holding off till the later part of the month primarily for the following three reasons:

1) We had just came off a huge win in the prior tournament and knew that several of the larger alliances were gunning for our locations.  As such, I wanted to have the option of reacting to and utilizing our vast cavalry reserves rather then as in the prior tournament the cavalry reserves of competing alliances being used against us.  I seem to recall a 40K cavalry hit that forced the devs to relook at their combat system.  

2)  This was the biggest factor:  The squares would be become more valuable in the later state of the month.  So, I championed again to hold our reserves in order and to start off by "punishing" with cavalry certain squares/stacks so as to build up the value of certain real estate.  

3) The skyclad was an unknown unit and without any stats associated with them, I again did what I could to forestall H?'s total commitment to the tourney.  I refer you to thread announcing the rules and prizes for the last tournament and my fourth post requesting  stats for the units in question.  With the devs not being forth coming, I personally wasn't going to put my troops or  H?'s troops at risk till there was a clarification of this point.  Combine this with #2 and you can see that I was more then happy to sit back and watch things develop. 

An excellent post/lesson on strategy and military tactics!

Back to Top
Anjire View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 688
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 17:45
I will take a great deal of the blame for our "low" participation in the last tournament.  

I was very vocal about H? holding off till the later part of the month primarily for the following three reasons:

1) We had just came off a huge win in the prior tournament and knew that several of the larger alliances were gunning for our locations.  As such, I wanted to have the option of reacting to and utilizing our vast cavalry reserves rather then as in the prior tournament the cavalry reserves of competing alliances being used against us.  I seem to recall a 40K cavalry hit that forced the devs to relook at their combat system.  

2)  This was the biggest factor:  The squares would be become more valuable in the later state of the month.  So, I championed again to hold our reserves in order and to start off by "punishing" with cavalry certain squares/stacks so as to build up the value of certain real estate.  

3) The skyclad was an unknown unit and without any stats associated with them, I again did what I could to forestall H?'s total commitment to the tourney.  I refer you to thread announcing the rules and prizes for the last tournament and my fourth post requesting  stats for the units in question.  With the devs not being forth coming, I personally wasn't going to put my troops or  H?'s troops at risk till there was a clarification of this point.  Combine this with #2 and you can see that I was more then happy to sit back and watch things develop. 


Edited by Anjire - 08 Apr 2013 at 17:46

Back to Top
geofrey View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 31 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1013
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 16:27
Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:



The facts are that we are the largest alliance, however we've just come out of a 6 month war having spent literally millions of troops and a ridiculous amount of resources.  When you then figure in that the 2nd, 3rd and 4th alliances did not participate in the war I'm pleasantly surprised about where we are right now.

This is all very true... But it seems so strange that when H? was at 10 times the military capacity (100%) you performed so low at the beginning of the previous tournament. 

Luck is surely on your side this time. 

Back to Top
KillerPoodle View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1853
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 15:53
http://elgea.illyriad.co.uk/#/World/TournamentSquare/25

"Ancient Champions won" graph.

The start of the graph makes it look like a champion was won between day 1 and day 2. (since the graph shows zero on the y axis and 1 on the x axis at the origin. 

The graph should be [0,0] at the origin and the first data point for Soon should be at [1,1] - after 1 day of the tourney they had 1 champion.

At the moment it looks like we're in the middle of day 7 not day 6.





Edited by KillerPoodle - 08 Apr 2013 at 15:53
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
Back to Top
GM ThunderCat View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
GM

Joined: 11 Dec 2009
Location: Everywhere
Status: Offline
Points: 2157
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 15:42
Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:

With regard to the tournament pages - can someone on the dev side please fix the graphs on the regions page which start at 1 and not 0 - it's annoying (and incorrect). 
Example?
Back to Top
KillerPoodle View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1853
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 15:18
With regard to the tournament pages - can someone on the dev side please fix the graphs on the regions page which start at 1 and not 0 - it's annoying (and incorrect). 
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
Back to Top
KillerPoodle View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1853
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 Apr 2013 at 15:11
Mr Damage - your Population calcs are unfortunately flawed but this probably isn't the thread to debate it though.

Let me put something by you which might get you to understand.  Let's say your alliance was currently in first place and a bunch of people started posting on the forum (rightly or wrongly) that it was because you were way too powerful and everyone should "take you guys out instead of each other" what exactly would you do?  Sit back and let it happen?

The facts are that we are the largest alliance, however we've just come out of a 6 month war having spent literally millions of troops and a ridiculous amount of resources.  When you then figure in that the 2nd, 3rd and 4th alliances did not participate in the war I'm pleasantly surprised about where we are right now.
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 678910 17>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.