 Grieves wrote:
...I have no intention of opening a debate on MK actions of old.
|
Nor do I. I am giving an opportunity to those who participated in those actions to publicly denounce them. You could contend that by joining PX, and agreeing to PX rules, they have done so. I, and perhaps others, would contend that accepting these war criminals without requiring a public confession and denouncement appears that PX is condoning...tacitly, if not actively, the actions of those individuals.
Grieves wrote:
As I re-iterated MK is dead and Tubana's cities were razed.
|
Yes, but there were others involved as well. Will they also be punished as Tubana was, or will they be given a free pass without any scrutiny from the community?
Grieves wrote:
...I agree you have your rights to be suspicious,...
|
Thank you. And I am offering an opportunity for those who cause those suspicions to allay them. Of course, as I stated previously, this request can be ignored, but doing so will not hasten the acceptance of PX claims to be different.
Grieves wrote:
... however your information about high ranking members of PX is somewhat misguided and out of date, indeed 3 of those stated are either not with us anymore...
|
Indeed, It appears I inadvertantly excluded the wrong 3. I'll amend that shortly
Grieves wrote:
... or under new ownership...
|
Then they should have no problem publicly denouncing the actions of the accounts' previous owners.
Grieves wrote:
...and others have no place on the council so ...
|
Touche'
Grieves wrote:
...I would suggest you judge PX by their actions of the future.
|
I'll be most happy to do so. Which is why I am asking for a
future denouncement of past misdeeds by those individuals who commited them.
Edited by Ivorich Von Forge - 31 Aug 2010 at 03:05
Tweet
Phoenix Alliance.
Topic Options
