The balance of power... |
Post Reply 
|
Page 123 4> |
| Author | ||||
Baesil 
New Poster 
Joined: 03 Jun 2013 Status: Offline Points: 19 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: The balance of power...Posted: 13 Aug 2014 at 01:52 |
|||
|
After four pages of posts I'm still not certain what the original poster's complaint was. Did he have some specific grievance in mind or was he apprehensive of the potential for an abuse of power that has not yet come to pass?
|
||||
 |
||||
|
scaramouche
Forum Warrior 
Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 432 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Aug 2014 at 17:21 |
|||
|
I see no reason to consider who will keep the GA in check....none of those alliances ever showed any inclination to want to dominate the server at any given time to my knowledge.
Their formation came only for one purpose, now that has come about...I only see them returning to their daily business and minding their own as they did before. |
||||
|
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
||||
|
||||
|
BBC
Greenhorn 
Joined: 18 Dec 2013 Location: the UK Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Aug 2014 at 14:39 |
|||
If people are truly worried about the balance of power than maybe we should give a different way of power to be obtained. If alliances are willing to give it a chance (such as PIG) then maybe if all alliances see a problem they can fully work together and stop them. If we can at least get 25% of alliance's to join then no matter the size or power of an alliance it wouldn't stand a chance against the alliance's involved. The power will no longer be measured by members like before, power will be measured by unity and the right ideas. If we work together we can change the act of power forever. Think about it.
|
||||
|
BlackBloodedChampion
"Will Work for War" |
||||
|
||||
|
TheBillPN
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Jun 2014 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 305 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Aug 2014 at 10:58 |
|||
|
Hey im not very involved in politics in this game, but i have a few questions...
First which alliances make up The Grand Alliance?
Second why does anyone have to control illy, why cant we all just follow the rules and be nice?
and Third, if someone does control illy, is this such a bad thing?how will it affect everyone if there is a group of alliances that can win any war...just dont start any wars...
|
||||
|
||||
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General 
Joined: 19 Oct 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2224 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12 Aug 2014 at 07:47 |
|||
Wow! Couldn't be more true! We should all join the Peaceful Illy Group (PIG)!!! To make sure this travesty never happens again! All alliances need to join or not have a voice! IGM Kumomoto or Empress Olivia if you want to join... |
||||
|
||||
|
BBC
Greenhorn
Joined: 18 Dec 2013 Location: the UK Status: Offline Points: 41 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11 Aug 2014 at 19:29 |
|||
|
who holds the power of balance in illy?
We all do. If there is a wrong and we all see it then what's stopping everyone joining in a mutual agreement to stop them? As a few we are weak, but together we are strong! Remember that everyone.
|
||||
|
BlackBloodedChampion
"Will Work for War" |
||||
|
||||
|
Nesse
Forum Warrior
Joined: 03 Oct 2010 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 406 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Aug 2014 at 20:55 |
|||
I haven't been partaking in the "server war for revenge" nor the debate about it, but this was an unusually skew comparison with the war I did participate in, so I will make a couple of comments: 1) If I am not completely misinformed, both wars ended when the "victims" surrendered to the side starting the war. I have some difficulty in seeing how it is the Grand Alliances fault that H? waited so long with that. 2) The terms of peace in the one major war included a requirement to keep the terms secret. I am not sure that condition is still in effect but I think you missed the townrazing part of those terms in describing how gracious the peace terms of that war were, KP? 3) I believe Crowfed has been an important force in "the war for revenge". They were not involved in the "one major war". Edited by Nesse - 10 Aug 2014 at 09:18 |
||||
|
Nesse(Dwarven Druids) and Odd (Fairy Road Authority)
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Imp
New Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 Location: BritishColumbia Status: Offline Points: 8 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 Aug 2014 at 17:21 |
|||
|
Accounts should not be "sat" at all. If YOU can't log in to play, then neither should your cities be available to help your Alliance. If it is an important enough account/city to the alliance they can reinforce as much as they want, but if YOU are not there to defend your own cities then so be it.
If there HAS to be sitters, the sitter is only allowed to consecutively "sit" for 60 days (or some finite time frame. Put a limit on it). If the owner has not returned/visited by then the account can no longer be sat until he/she does. Only city maintenance can be done. No shipment of goods outside the account and no aggressive military activity except defending the accounts cities. The sitter is only there to MAINTAIN the account until the owner returns. Again...if YOU can't find time to play the game, your account should not benefit from someone who has nothing but Illy time. And finally, each account may only "sit" ONE other account.  |
||||
|
||||
|
Hora
Postmaster 
Joined: 10 May 2010 Status: Offline Points: 839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 22:44 |
|||
|
... As the treaty does contain the founding of a PEACE alliance...
...maybe you could found a second alliance extra for KP and Aurordan, and I'd really like to see the Alliance chat  No, seriously, guys... just let it rest. The wars over, for now. And congrats on that!
 |
||||
|
||||
|
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 20:26 |
|||
There is a certain contradiction here between the bolded and the underlined part, you know ... ... not to mention the veiled threat ... 
Good guess that one ... 
Hmmm hmmm ... history decrees that it is not really the system of rule that declares whether it will have a positive effect, but the people that are actually ruling. If anyone doubts this, I can offer just one our of many examples : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_Greece
Well, I was never even sat for more than some hours when I slept, let alone perma-sat, but I definitely had no power to stop what came against me ... Power has nothing to do with activity, even if they do wipe out the perma-sat accounts ...  |
||||
  Just like a "before and after" ad ! ahahahaah :p |
||||
|
||||
|
Post Reply
|
Page 123 4> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Kumomoto wrote: