Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Attacks on my Cities
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAttacks on my Cities

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 1 Votes, Average 2.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
GM Luna View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar
Community Manager

Joined: 22 Oct 2011
Location: Illyriad
Status: Offline
Points: 2042
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Attacks on my Cities
    Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 21:49
Back and forth personal attacks and insults aren't welcome. Closing this thread.

Luna
GM Luna | Illyriad Community Manager | community@illyriad.co.uk

Back to Top
scaramouche View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 432
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 21:19
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Originally posted by scaramouche scaramouche wrote:


im a consone member..i havent moaned about any attacks..i havent lied to anyone about anything and i certainly havent acted like a victim...our alliance didnt attack anyone first even though you continue with your accusations of " ALL " consone members being he aggressors, again,  your arrogance proceeds you.

I didn't say you, I would point most directly to Thes Hunter who made an entire thread about it.  Then we can move to the countless posts in the various threads where Consone attempts to paint H? as the aggressors.  And yes I often refer to consone as 'consone' I don't go through and spell out what each alliance and what each player in each alliance did.  Doing so would simply take to long.  Deal with it if your a member consone you get associated with all of consone.  

They very first attack made was by a consone member, the player who ignored diplomacy at the very beginning was a consone member.  That makes consone the aggressors, they drew first blood.  If you want to try and say that that was just 1 person not 'consone' then the consone alliances should have denounced the action.  Instead the consone alliances supported it.  Once again consone members try and act as one when it is convient for them and then when it isn't pretend that they have no diplomatic ties with each other.  

Also the fact that you repeatedly do direct insults shows that you simply can't find any valid points to counter my arguments.  
my highlighting your own admission to being arrogant doesnt insult you...you insult yourself...you stated ALL consone members and I defend not just myself but the whole alliance i am in to the accusations you so boldly make for all to see.
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
Back to Top
deorasandeep View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2012
Location: lucknow,india
Status: Offline
Points: 35
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 21:17
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Originally posted by scaramouche scaramouche wrote:


im a consone member..i havent moaned about any attacks..i havent lied to anyone about anything and i certainly havent acted like a victim...our alliance didnt attack anyone first even though you continue with your accusations of " ALL " consone members being he aggressors, again,  your arrogance proceeds you.

I didn't say you, I would point most directly to Thes Hunter who made an entire thread about it.  Then we can move to the countless posts in the various threads where Consone attempts to paint H? as the aggressors.  And yes I often refer to consone as 'consone' I don't go through and spell out what each alliance and what each player in each alliance did.  Doing so would simply take to long.  Deal with it if your a member consone you get associated with all of consone.  

They very first attack made was by a consone member, the player who ignored diplomacy at the very beginning was a consone member.  That makes consone the aggressors, they drew first blood.  If you want to try and say that that was just 1 person not 'consone' then the consone alliances should have denounced the action.  Instead the consone alliances supported it.  Once again consone members try and act as one when it is convient for them and then when it isn't pretend that they have no diplomatic ties with each other.  

Also the fact that you repeatedly do direct insults shows that you simply can't find any valid points to counter my arguments.  



nobody as well pointed you too  and yes "when one breaks the rule the person is wrong and when mny break same rule rule may be wrong "

Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 21:05
Originally posted by scaramouche scaramouche wrote:


im a consone member..i havent moaned about any attacks..i havent lied to anyone about anything and i certainly havent acted like a victim...our alliance didnt attack anyone first even though you continue with your accusations of " ALL " consone members being he aggressors, again,  your arrogance proceeds you.

I didn't say you, I would point most directly to Thes Hunter who made an entire thread about it.  Then we can move to the countless posts in the various threads where Consone attempts to paint H? as the aggressors.  And yes I often refer to consone as 'consone' I don't go through and spell out what each alliance and what each player in each alliance did.  Doing so would simply take to long.  Deal with it if your a member consone you get associated with all of consone.  

They very first attack made was by a consone member, the player who ignored diplomacy at the very beginning was a consone member.  That makes consone the aggressors, they drew first blood.  If you want to try and say that that was just 1 person not 'consone' then the consone alliances should have denounced the action.  Instead the consone alliances supported it.  Once again consone members try and act as one when it is convient for them and then when it isn't pretend that they have no diplomatic ties with each other.  

Also the fact that you repeatedly do direct insults shows that you simply can't find any valid points to counter my arguments.  
Back to Top
scaramouche View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 432
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 20:59
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Well I got tired of all the members of consone lying and acting like they are some victims being attacked by the big bad H?.  Even though it was them who attacked first, it was also them who declared war.  And then they come on here and do some role playing.  So figured I may as well do some role playing as well.  After all if we follow consone's example we just shouldn't mention the straight truth we should only pretend as if we are being attacked for no reason by a much bigger opponent whether we are the aggressors or whether we are bigger or not.  


im a consone member..i havent moaned about any attacks..i havent lied to anyone about anything and i certainly havent acted like a victim...our alliance didnt attack anyone first even though you continue with your accusations of " ALL " consone members being he aggressors, again,  your arrogance proceeds you.
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 20:51
Well I got tired of all the members of consone lying and acting like they are some victims being attacked by the big bad H?.  Even though it was them who attacked first, it was also them who declared war.  And then they come on here and do some role playing.  So figured I may as well do some role playing as well.  After all if we follow consone's example we just shouldn't mention the straight truth we should only pretend as if we are being attacked for no reason by a much bigger opponent whether we are the aggressors or whether we are bigger or not.  


Back to Top
scaramouche View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 432
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 20:34
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Originally posted by deorasandeep deorasandeep wrote:

Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Originally posted by Hora Hora wrote:

 
... wow, what big an EGO  Clap  ... 

Its a game where I play a king.  Why shouldn't I have fun and have a big ego :D


every player in itself is a king why not respect the other king's ego if you know what it means.
or u have 2 meanings for same one to satify your Ego and to hurts other Ego

Nah I like to play an arrogant king on the forums.  
doing a good job then. and bragging about your arrogance highlights your arrogance even further

Edited by scaramouche - 20 Oct 2012 at 20:36
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 20:08
Originally posted by deorasandeep deorasandeep wrote:

Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Originally posted by Hora Hora wrote:

 
... wow, what big an EGO  Clap  ... 

Its a game where I play a king.  Why shouldn't I have fun and have a big ego :D


every player in itself is a king why not respect the other king's ego if you know what it means.
or u have 2 meanings for same one to satify your Ego and to hurts other Ego

Nah I like to play an arrogant king on the forums.  
Back to Top
deorasandeep View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster
Avatar

Joined: 17 Sep 2012
Location: lucknow,india
Status: Offline
Points: 35
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 18:41
Originally posted by DeathDealer89 DeathDealer89 wrote:

Originally posted by Hora Hora wrote:

 
... wow, what big an EGO  Clap  ... 

Its a game where I play a king.  Why shouldn't I have fun and have a big ego :D


every player in itself is a king why not respect the other king's ego if you know what it means.
or u have 2 meanings for same one to satify your Ego and to hurts other Ego
Back to Top
Darmon View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 315
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Oct 2012 at 18:07
Originally posted by JimJams JimJams wrote:

Forums usually are not good to mitigate problems, and very good to exacerbate them.

Written words are read, then re-read, and re-read again, and every bit of bitterness, every slightly wrong sentence, is analyzed generating even more misunderstanding and anger.

That's why I don't like to use forums to solve problems (and add to this English is not my language and I am not that good understanding double meanings and nuances).

IGM are better, if the people using it are good enough to not share private messages.

I haven't agreed with the majority of the H? rhetoric, but this does resound with a certain amount of truth.  Private talks do seem the more expedient way to reach understandings, but only if all parties involved are willing.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.