| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
JimJams
Forum Warrior
Joined: 20 Sep 2011
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 496
|
Topic: Real Covert Ops Posted: 23 Mar 2012 at 23:13 |
Calico_Jack wrote:
now comes the hard part, implementing it... i dont do webdesign or programming/scripting only game-design and level creation... 
need to capture a dev and make him/her start working on it  |
They have the code already (about). It is used to spot diplo attack.
|
 |
JimJams
Forum Warrior
Joined: 20 Sep 2011
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 496
|
Posted: 23 Mar 2012 at 23:11 |
Calico_Jack wrote:
on the issue of sight range of cities which right now are infinite, maybe a compromise on this, longer sight and if someone in your alliance sees the army you get the report and "hidden" scouts following it.
I just think the infinite range to see armies are too much and leaves Scouts less useful then they could be, (still very useful during sieges) |
If the range is big enough to give people time to prepare for defense (from a slow siege army) it would ok to me too.
|
 |
JimJams
Forum Warrior
Joined: 20 Sep 2011
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 496
|
Posted: 23 Mar 2012 at 23:08 |
SunStorm wrote:
Calico_Jack wrote:
i said in a previous post that they
should in this case add a occupy ability to scouts, so that you can plan
them around your borders and by so they will keep an eye on that area
for as long as you say before sending them out | I couldn't agree more with being able to set scouts to occupy a space! I would love to see a whole thread on this! Imagine occupying 50k thieves into one city to ensure it could NEVER be thieved! Imagine sending scouts to occupy a spot with troops and the opponent not being able to scout unless they have a greater number. There are so many possibilities! (please start a thread about this if you feel it's worth discussing further) However, I would not want to have to ship out 50+ every few weeks just to know if I am about to be sieged. Whats more, new players who are not in an alliance have no way to set up any detection for an incoming attack - and this is unfair to those who are just starting out in the game.
|
I agree diplo would deserve some changes, making them able to reinforce a city or a standing army is one interesting option.
I still don't like the option to use them to discover incoming covered armies. It could be done the same way it is now for diplo attack, you get the advice when the unit is within a certain range without the need to send around units every now and then. As I said I don't like to do repetitive meaninglessness action. And I still believe the way it is working now is fine.
|
 |
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 22 Mar 2012 at 23:07 |
I agree with SunStorm. I recall a couple of cases where players tried to start trouble by having another new player (or it might have been an alt) attack them and then complain about it. The situation was fairly quickly sussed out by gc.
Not sure why people find this sort of behavior amusing, but it takes all kinds, I suppose.
|
 |
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 22 Mar 2012 at 21:39 |
Calico_Jack wrote:
need to capture a dev |
DEV's are like leprechauns - very hard to catch, but if ya get one, they just might grant you a wish! (^_^)
Subatoi wrote:
Um,
or they are the people that know if they *pretend* to be scared on gc
the crusaders will pop up and kill their enemy. We could test this out
by getting a few people to have secret newbie accounts then randomly
popping up on global in the next few months complaining of big bad
players when in reality they just want to start some trouble by killing
someone. |
Yes, that may very well be another method to try. However, I would like to point out the following...
Subatoi wrote:
they *pretend* to be scared |
Nobody that is looking for a fight is going to *pretend* to be scared. Either they were attacked and don't want to enter into a PvP competition (and are truly scared because the other player is continuing hostilities which they want no part of), or they were actually the instigator trying to cause trouble - and the attack was a result of their own actions. This has happened before, and nobody came to help them. Does the player "Aneirin" ring a bell?
Subatoi wrote:
We could test this out
by getting a few people to have secret newbie accounts then randomly
popping up on global in the next few months complaining of big bad
players when in reality they just want to start some trouble by killing
someone. |
Sounds like you might have already tried this. I remember a week ago a player still under new player protection claiming that another player had just attacked and thieved them... not too smart if ya ask me. FURTHERMORE, there is always the burden of proof. If their claim can be substantiated beyond a doubt, then yes - others will offer them help. However, there have been attempts which new players have tried to make such claims and they have turned out to be false.
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
 |
Subatoi
Forum Warrior
Joined: 01 Mar 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 380
|
Posted: 22 Mar 2012 at 21:14 |
SunStorm wrote:
Calico_Jack wrote:
why do people worry about new players? hell if i attack a player with 30k pop and he/she goes running to GC i will be in trouble because im 20k bigger... | This is not always the case. The players who get in trouble are the ones that are going out of their way to be a jerk to another. If you are simply attacking someone to get a rise out of them or get a little action, that is great as long as they are willing to fight with you. But the ones that go running to Global are the ones that are:
- (1) not wanting to fight
- (2) not set up to handle fighting (perhaps they are playing for the trade aspect of the game)
- (3) or completely too small to fight for themselves
When the player continues aggressions against another who falls into one of the three (and there could very well be more reasons why they are not willing or unable to agree to any dueling initiated by the instigator), then others who can and will meet the challenge step in. Then all of a sudden, the hunter becomes the hunted and accuses others of being a big bully. (>.<) History repeats itself.
|
Um, or they are the people that know if they *pretend* to be scared on gc the crusaders will pop up and kill their enemy. We could test this out by getting a few people to have secret newbie accounts then randomly popping up on global in the next few months complaining of big bad players when in reality they just want to start some trouble by killing someone.
|
 |
Rorgash
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: 22 Mar 2012 at 21:07 |
now comes the hard part, implementing it... i dont do webdesign or programming/scripting only game-design and level creation... 
need to capture a dev and make him/her start working on it 
|
 |
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 22 Mar 2012 at 21:01 |
|
(^_^) Agreed! And about the 8 days away thing... yeah, I have send (and received) some which are 12 days... plenty of warning - in fact too much. I got so distracted with seeing it there every day that I eventually stopped paying attention. When it finally hit, I forgot all about it - lol
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
 |
Rorgash
Postmaster
Joined: 23 Aug 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 894
|
Posted: 22 Mar 2012 at 20:58 |
i could see a 4-5 day or something spotting range on a siege, since being a siege is a slow moving horde of troops and materials for the siege, which is easily spotted, and a big deal, still dont want it to be seen 8 days away 
But raids and normal attack i think should not be seen until inside range 
So what you said sounds good to me
|
 |
SunStorm
Postmaster
Joined: 01 Apr 2011
Location: "Look Up"
Status: Offline
Points: 979
|
Posted: 22 Mar 2012 at 20:53 |
|
Yes, in my situation, I was well aware of the possibility of an attack. However, there was no game feature that would allow a siege to sneak up . . . That is (after all) what I am taking a firm stance against.
Covert raids, on the other hand, could be in interesting development.
|
"Side? I am on nobody's side because nobody is on my side" ~LoTR
|
 |