This ****ing war

First of all, quit it with the "god" nonsense ... taking a roleplaying antique and beating like a dead horse around the forums is really bad taste/manners. 

Second problem is that I never stated that the Coalition is being led by rank and this is your supposition. As far as I am concerned the Coalition is a leadership based on knowledge.

And last but not the least, even with your unfounded supposition, why did you place prominent players like these in the lowest rank .?. I find it mindly amusing that you think that such splitting tactics work or that you seem to think that they cannot read the aforementioned post on their own and place themselves in their correct position in the Coalition hierachy and thus take offence at my simple analogies (which as I said are known solutions from ancient times) .?. 

But even if I naively take your question at face value and we SUPPOSE that there are ranks, it is OBVIOUS that if someone would be in the trooper category that is players my size and with my "powers" within his alliance's hierarchy (just a mere "full member"), while people like Bonaparte and Belargyle that you mentioned would obviously have many many stars on their rank and of course the relative powers along with their status. Again all these only with the supposition that those ranks exist in the manner you supposed. Proof that rigid ranks do not exist is my ability to write all those things without any worries of any limitations imposed by my low position in the hierarchy ... and if you find that proposition a bit weird try overriding hierarchy in the army by stating your opinion, in a real rank based leadership, and tell me how that worked out for you !  

Also, according to the previous posts, the striking difference between the Coalition and Consone is that with the Coalition you know whom to speak with and who is responsible for what branch and there is (judging from the posts in these forums) a concensus on the basic matters (you know, like goals/objectives) that any confed should agree upon and so they do not contradict each other with each post. Pretty basic/obvious stuff for any organisation of people comprized by more than 3 people and I am still amazed how Consone considers itself as an actual confederation without even the most basic forms of communication and common ground between its leaders.

scaramouche wrote: Oh well..then I guess there's no more talking with you about it then ..is there.

If you think that my advice is unsound or that I am wrong, hey, good for me ... but for the sake of argueing, do try to at least defend your position/idea/opinion with something better than a childish "niah niah niah I am not listening to youuuuuuu" 

Huzzah, Rill!