This ****ing war

Deranzin wrote: scaramouche wrote: ive lost count on how many times its been stated in the forums that there never was a definitive consone leadership...Jasche said on a few occasions at the present time when all this came about, that consone leadership was made from the leaders of all the member alliances. Not having a SPECIFIC CENTRAL leadership is one thing and those respective leaders (or top alliance members in this case) contradicting one another is totally another thing.  scaramouche wrote: Consone was a project that was never given the time to finalise matters such as this due to ( obviously the war) different time zones between alliance leaders and difficult communication. well..Deranzin...if you can honestly tell me H or you for that matter could organize a complex organisation such as consone was/is in such a short period without some chaos..then your a better man than most. There you have it :  http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/alliances-one-whole-or-many-parts_topic4648_post61043.html?KW=platoon#61043 within it there is also another link, but I'll put it here as well :  http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/rhyagelle-responds-to-absaroke-aggression_topic4306_post55952.html?KW=platoon#55952 And it is not a matter of being better or not because this is a problem solved since antiquity, so I do not accept that sentence of yours. It is just common sense on how to progressively move from leading a small group, to leading a larger group and then and even larger group and so forth.  So, it is not that Consone never had the time to come in fruition, but it was flawed to begin with, by its design. (the arguments for that, in the links)

Oh well..then I guess there's no more talking with you about it then ..is there.

"Deranzin....."

So what is the difference between Consone and Coalition in that matter? Maybe H is percieved as God by some of your minions but I doubt that Bonaparte or Belargyle for instance would see themselves as mere troopers in your platoon.

how can this even be consider a true war when people are restricted when attacking the other side. ask the question why alagos is not touched in the west or why people seldom lose more than one or two towns. many military functions are not allowed against consone. its the consone leaders that are causing this war to go on and on, they need to surrender and accept terms. our side is showing great patience waiting for them to do what is best for their alliance members and accept their failure as leaders. personally i am disapponted in the dirty play involving their manipulation of others to cause harm to their opponents but be warned, even though i am a forgivng person, others might not be so inclined.

EvilKatia wrote: Well I think you got what he said wrong Hadus : no matter what he says  it wont really stop the war or change it. Same for what I say or what you say or what unnivolved others say.  It is up to those at war to decide to end it or not to.  That doesn't mean nothing interesting get said or that you won't have interesting conversation. It just mean that its not very probable anything that get said here (on this thread or the next one to be created ) will change the course of the war or will get the feuding alliances to make peace.

Well, that's certainly part of it, and I agree. Our opinions mean very little and can do very little when we are outside the scope of the conflict. But scottfitz seemed to be using that as rationale for not posting at all, based on his quote, which I don't agree on.

Well I think you got what he said wrong Hadus : no matter what he says  it wont really stop the war or change it.