Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The Spin
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedThe Spin

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456>
Author
Angrim View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 20:25
H?'s policy is of no concern to me, but an accurate count might make the war something the rest of the server could follow, possibly even enjoy.  perhaps a thread could be opened (or two, if the opponents cannot coexist in a single thread) where players from each side could record towns reduced...?
Back to Top
KillerPoodle View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1853
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 20:27
What's even dumber is that you guys are disputing things which are not on our list, which means, by definition, we don't have and then getting all upset because we're not sharing that info which we don't have and which we asked you to provide.

P.S. Posting IGM's is against forum rules.
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
Back to Top
scaramouche View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 432
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 20:29
I'll be honest and say i'm not really interested in who can brag the most in a list highlighted on the forums of people cities lost.
At the end of the day the end result of who surrenders to who is all that matters...this alone will determine who razed the most.
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
Back to Top
The Duke View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 20:32
I didnt post an igm, i quoted you there was alot more to the igm. 
and Derazin, Show me where I mentioned anything about pop and NC, generalizing "you guys" isnt fair to either side imo unless talking about an issue the entire side is involved in. 
Its pretty clear the numbers wont be forthcoming so Ill share with you post war KP, when we are all bloody and Ouch : )
"Our generation has had no Great Depression, no Great War. Our war is spiritual. Our depression is our lives."
Back to Top
Deranzin View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 20:34
Originally posted by scaramouche scaramouche wrote:

I'll be honest and say i'm not really interested in who can brag the most in a list highlighted on the forums of people cities lost.
At the end of the day the end result of who surrenders to who is all that matters...this alone will determine who razed the most.


+1

The actual count is immaterial I totally agree, but you'd have to agree the whole topic is quite fun. Smile
Back to Top
Deranzin View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 20:41
Originally posted by The Duke The Duke wrote:


and Derazin, Show me where I mentioned anything about pop and NC, generalizing "you guys" isnt fair to either side imo unless talking about an issue the entire side is involved in. 
 


Well, excuse me, but if we are to believe what we have been hearing here all these months NC are an issue with which your "entire side is involved in" or so they claimed.

I have no knowledge and I have seen no announcement on why your alliance particularly is in this war, but since those things are absent from any public knowledge one can only assume that you agree with the agenda, the reasons and the cause of your allies (else you wouldn't have been fighting alongside them, reason says).

Now considering that the side you are fighting for was totally busting this place with this argument, well, sorry, but since you jumped in on that side it can be safely assumed that you at least agreed with their main argument for this war. Right .?. Wink

If I am wrong/mistaken and you never agreed on that "population does not equate battleworthy-ness" argument then I will gladly edit/reform my post, but it would automatically mean that all this time you believed that the fight against NC was lopsided and effectively a bullying tactic and that you endorsed it despite that.

Your choice. Wink

Edit : minor corrections.


Edited by Deranzin - 17 Nov 2013 at 20:43
Back to Top
The Duke View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 20:45
Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:

Originally posted by The Duke The Duke wrote:


and Derazin, Show me where I mentioned anything about pop and NC, generalizing "you guys" isnt fair to either side imo unless talking about an issue the entire side is involved in. 
 


Well, excuse me, but if we are to believe what we have been hearing here all these months NC are an issue with which your "entire side is involved in" or so they claimed.

I have no knowledge and I have seen no announcement on why your alliance particularly is in this war, but since those things are absent from any public knowledge one can only assume that you agree with the agenda, the reasons and the cause of your allies (else you wouldn't have been fighting alongside them, reason says).

Now considering that the side you are fighting for was totally busting this place with this argument, well, sorry, but since you jumped in on that side it can be safely assumed that you at least agreed with their main argument for this war. Right .?. Wink

If I am wrong/mistaken and you never agreed on that "population does not equate battleworthy-ness" argument then I will gladly edit/reform my post, but it would automatically mean that all this time you believed that the fight against NC was lopsided and effectively a bullying tactic and that you endorsed it despite that.

Your choice. Wink

Edit : minor corrections.
Too many assumptions in one post , you know that old saying right. 
"Our generation has had no Great Depression, no Great War. Our war is spiritual. Our depression is our lives."
Back to Top
DeathDealer89 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster


Joined: 04 Jan 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 944
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 20:46
Duke seriously stop quoting 100 lines of text and then adding 1 line of text.  
Back to Top
Deranzin View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 20:59
Originally posted by The Duke The Duke wrote:

Originally posted by Deranzin Deranzin wrote:

Originally posted by The Duke The Duke wrote:


and Derazin, Show me where I mentioned anything about pop and NC, generalizing "you guys" isnt fair to either side imo unless talking about an issue the entire side is involved in. 
 


Well, excuse me, but if we are to believe what we have been hearing here all these months NC are an issue with which your "entire side is involved in" or so they claimed.

I have no knowledge and I have seen no announcement on why your alliance particularly is in this war, but since those things are absent from any public knowledge one can only assume that you agree with the agenda, the reasons and the cause of your allies (else you wouldn't have been fighting alongside them, reason says).

Now considering that the side you are fighting for was totally busting this place with this argument, well, sorry, but since you jumped in on that side it can be safely assumed that you at least agreed with their main argument for this war. Right .?. Wink

If I am wrong/mistaken and you never agreed on that "population does not equate battleworthy-ness" argument then I will gladly edit/reform my post, but it would automatically mean that all this time you believed that the fight against NC was lopsided and effectively a bullying tactic and that you endorsed it despite that.

Your choice. Wink

Edit : minor corrections.
Too many assumptions in one post , you know that old saying right. 


And there are not many assumptions, just a long explanations of ONE FACT (the fact that since you are on THAT side, then you share their agenda and ideas, else you wouldn't be there in the first place) in case someone "misquotes" or "misunderstands" me ... ;)

But putting that aside you didn't inform me of your choice ... do you stand by your previous quote about population and have an opposite opinion on this matter than your allies or not .?. Wink

If not, I trust that you will at least refrain from using that argument again and have some consistency in your side's arguments ... Big smile
Back to Top
Epidemic View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 03 Nov 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 768
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Nov 2013 at 21:01
I'll be more than happy to keep track of all razed/exodus cities, if you send me the info. I also will add  categories for inactive/permasat accounts taken out of the game i.e.(Beecks) and a list of players who abandon the game because of this war.


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.