Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The History of Illyriad (incomplete)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The History of Illyriad (incomplete)

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 10>
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 3 Votes, Average 5.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
G0DsDestroyer View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Location: Ásgarð/Vanaheim
Status: Offline
Points: 975
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote G0DsDestroyer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Sep 2012 at 17:47
Originally posted by Nokigon Nokigon wrote:

 


In the end, the winner was Amorphias, with second going to duuvian and G0Ds coming third.



I thought I got second in Armok's blood bowl

Confused



Edited by G0DsDestroyer - 11 Sep 2012 at 17:47
Back to Top
Nokigon View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Historian

Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nokigon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 19:34
Firstly, if Luna browses over this, I don't mind the debate in the history despite the terms of the Traveller's Tale. I always welcome criticism, so long as it is constructive. The only thing I would object to is generalising- the bit about you is in the scale of the whole thing rather small.
 
Anyway. I actually disagree with the statement that it is heavily biased. It may emphasise the actions of some over others, possibly wrongly, but I have never once in that complimented Lorre or Createure or anyone. Quite possibly, wrongly, but anyway. My largest objection to that piece is the shortness, as I feel that it was an important event and I don't think the  piece does it justice.
 
_duQ. Thanks for imforming me about the Anjire thing; my main source of information, unfortunately, is the forums and as you can probably imagine this is not a particularly trustworthy source. I should really be grateful that this is the first protest that I have received.
 
Your analysis about Illyriad is interesting, very much so. In a lot of your points I completely agree with you, and most certainly agree that the one server is the main cause of the atmosphere in the game- in a charitable mood, I'd call it peaceful; in an angry mood I'd call it dull. However, this is beside the point of the post. I never ONCE wanted to have this thread as a debate on the comparative merits/disadvantages to the game, and I think you based the majority of your post on an impression given to you by a sentence that was not intended to give that meaning. If it offended you, I apologise. If you would like me to change it, I will. I have never been one of the lynch mob. A quick forum search will reveal that my alliance was one of the few alliances that was involved in the S&B war, but not in the Valar war. Why? One was a fair cause. The other was cruel and in my opinion unnecessary.
 
Please, however, do submit the reasons for the berberos incident. As far as I'm aware, the only explanation ever given is that you wanted to secure your cities and you deemed berberos too close. If there is another side to the story, then I would appreciate it if you told me and I will adjust the account accordingly.
Back to Top
KillerPoodle View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1853
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KillerPoodle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 16:40
Originally posted by Kumomoto Kumomoto wrote:

Originally posted by LordOfTheSwamp LordOfTheSwamp wrote:


Originally posted by _duQ _duQ wrote:

After the tournament, I had 2 choices, either use a sitter or try to play the wargame by attacking the biggest fish in the pond. When I presented my choice to Azreil, he agreed with attacking H as the good move.

Now that is without a doubt one of the most interesting things I've ever read on this forum.

It's the first I've heard of it, and there's no way to know if it's true, but it's certainly an interesting assertion.


We knew this.


I also know what you had for breakfast.
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
Back to Top
_duQ View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 03 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote _duQ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 16:29
Quote
Actually, as an analysis it was pretty interesting. Your conclusions, I would argue with. The basic observations are pretty solid. But if you wanted a discussion about that, you should perhaps have posted elsewhere. Instead you decided to post in Noki's history thread.

History allows analysis.
My own experience is necessarily relevant to my analysis and part of the method I used to analyse.

But dully noted.
I will copy the relevant parts in a more relevant topic as soon as I have some time, perhaps tomorrow.
< ="application/x-dap-" id="DAPPlugin" style="visibility: collapse">
Back to Top
Kumomoto View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General


Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 2224
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kumomoto Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 13:57
Originally posted by LordOfTheSwamp LordOfTheSwamp wrote:


Originally posted by _duQ _duQ wrote:

After the tournament, I had 2 choices, either use a sitter or try to play the wargame by attacking the biggest fish in the pond. When I presented my choice to Azreil, he agreed with attacking H as the good move.

Now that is without a doubt one of the most interesting things I've ever read on this forum.

It's the first I've heard of it, and there's no way to know if it's true, but it's certainly an interesting assertion.


We knew this.
Back to Top
LordOfTheSwamp View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Location: Swamp of Fyrgis
Status: Offline
Points: 481
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LordOfTheSwamp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 12:20
Since I'm assuming that was directed at me...

Originally posted by _duQ _duQ wrote:

And Noki can't have full knowledge of events but you can.

I think I've always been clear that Illy is too complex for one person to understand, and that people should always be mindful of their ignorance (e.g.  http://wisdomofkurdruk.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/so-its-war/ , http://wisdomofkurdruk.wordpress.com/2011/06/13/the-danger-of-ignorance/ , and http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/seeing-the-good-and-the-bad-in-h_topic3901.html )

Originally posted by _duQ _duQ wrote:

And you're not being defaming when you imply that I lie about Az.

At the time, Az assured me that he was trying to calm you down and avoid war. You posted here that you and Az were plotting war. Someone's not telling the truth. I have no way to know which of you it is.

I regard your past actions as a menace to the peace of Illyria (and I turned out to be right), and I'm still angry that Az ran away when the war started and left the rest of us to try to work out what on earth was going on - so I'm not a fan of either of you, but I'm in no position to tell which of you is/was being less than truthful.

Like I say, yours was an interesting assertion. I'm not in a position to say more than that. But it certainly was interesting.

Originally posted by _duQ _duQ wrote:

And you're not biaised, because you've never been one of my detractors in the past.

I have always been quite clear on this. I regard peace in Illyriad as a good thing, and I have frequently held up both you and Lorre as prime examples of people who threatened that peace. So certainly, I am not a fan.

I also didn't enjoy being one of the people who had to sort out the "war". I didn't enjoy watching good players quit the game (remember DakotaStrider and KingAtreus?). I didn't enjoy having to explain to 80 mystified players that H? and the jackal-pack could destroy everything they'd worked to build if they felt like it and that neither I nor anyone else knew why it was happening. I didn't enjoy watching players I had previously respected turn into a misguided lynch mob. The "war" was the single most unpleasant experience I've had in Illyriad, and I nearly quit the game over it. And I hold you partially responsible for that. So absolutely, I'm not your fan.

Originally posted by _duQ _duQ wrote:

And you're not illustrating what I said about right thinking people "knowing" the official holly truth.

Correct. I am quite clearly not illustrating that.

Originally posted by _duQ _duQ wrote:

And my reply wasn't at all analysis and thoughts about Illyriad but was fully dedicated to a parochialism quarrel.

Actually, as an analysis it was pretty interesting. Your conclusions, I would argue with. The basic observations are pretty solid. But if you wanted a discussion about that, you should perhaps have posted elsewhere. Instead you decided to post in Noki's history thread.

So, I ignored the off-topic analysis, and focused on your utterly incorrect assertion that Noki's post was defamation and "crap", and on the entirely relevant assertion that you made that you and Az were plotting war - which was, as I said, a really interesting comment.
"A boy is building sandcastles on a beach. You go and kick down his castle. You could say that it only reflects how you play with sandcastles. Others may think it reflects who you are." - Ander.
Back to Top
_duQ View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 03 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote _duQ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 11:58
Not a chance?
1st, can you tell me how many troops H and Valar had in summer 2011, before and after the tournament?
Assuming the numbers were bad, what about travelling time, recalling delays, siege camp setting delay? Timing is essential in Illyriad combat. And timing allows strategy, even if I don't remember anyone using actual elaborate strategies in Illyriad... yet. 

There are plenty of stratagems (actual stratagems not the game rules' stratagems) allowing to take down a superior force:
  • Drawing reinforcement to 1 place: either the enemy takes the bait and you attack elsewhere or he doesn't and you destroy the first target
  • Attacking weakest or loneliest players
  • Scorched earth policy
  • forcing a cav attack by being just in range for the cav but not the other troops
  • etc.
In term of pure numbers, Valar shouldn't have been able to win the 2nd tournament. But more active players, less troop-consuming hunting, new player mentoring dedicated to hunting, appropriate recruting (Boromir, Angrum, Kurdruk, etc.) have been the keys. How do you that happened? By chance?

A war would have been much more difficult, but "not a chance" looks like H propaganda to me.
Back to Top
_duQ View Drop Down
New Poster
New Poster


Joined: 03 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 9
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote _duQ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 10:24
Sure! Clap

And Noki can't have full knowledge of events but you can.
And you're not being defaming when you imply that I lie about Az.
And you're not biaised, because you've never been one of my detractors in the past.
And you're not illustrating what I said about right thinking people "knowing" the official holly truth.
And my reply wasn't at all analysis and thoughts about Illyriad but was fully dedicated to a parochialism quarrel.

And remember what everyone knows: _duQ kills puppys each time he sneezes and he eats children for breakfast.

< ="application/x-dap-" id="DAPPlugin" style="visibility: collapse">
Back to Top
SugarFree View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 09 Feb 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 350
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SugarFree Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 08:36
really? Az was not the brightest bulb in the store, but he knew he and VALAR did not stand a chance against H?'s power. 
Back to Top
LordOfTheSwamp View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 23 May 2011
Location: Swamp of Fyrgis
Status: Offline
Points: 481
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LordOfTheSwamp Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 Sep 2012 at 06:43
Originally posted by _duQ _duQ wrote:

What a defamatory peace of crap about me!
 

No, it isn't. It's heavily biased, inevitably selective in its coverage (as Noki can't have full knowledge of events), and in places of questionable accuracy; on the "_duQ incident" it seems to suck up to Lorre absurdly, downplays the role played by Createure and others, etc. ...

But it is neither "defamatory" nor "crap"

Originally posted by _duQ _duQ wrote:

After the tournament, I had 2 choices, either use a sitter or try to play the wargame by attacking the biggest fish in the pond. When I presented my choice to Azreil, he agreed with attacking H as the good move.

Now that is without a doubt one of the most interesting things I've ever read on this forum.

It's the first I've heard of it, and there's no way to know if it's true, but it's certainly an interesting assertion.
"A boy is building sandcastles on a beach. You go and kick down his castle. You could say that it only reflects how you play with sandcastles. Others may think it reflects who you are." - Ander.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 10>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.