The Great War |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 7891011 23> |
| Author | |||
Tamaeon
Wordsmith
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Location: Centrum Status: Offline Points: 152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 Jan 2015 at 00:56 |
||
I agree.
Since being outed as a malicious liar; I've chosen to change my ways and join the truth brethren in their crusade against evil spin and misrepresentations of the oh-so-holy doctrine of truthfulness. I was one of the many, at the weekly Elgean anti-H? convention; who were blinded to the holy gospel after witnessing Rill's incessant campaigning against the H?oliness. As his h?oliness reverend KP (a.k.a. poodle-ishous) famously uttered in firm rejection of H?'s evil and pagan ways...
I TamAeon, devout scribe and tinfoil hat wearing mad-scientist who has closely studied the climatological developments of Lord Sigurd's kingdom... declare, that it will be a cold day in the wastes before myself and the brethren of truth, allow Rill and other non-crows to taint the good name of the church of H?, and its holy crusade against spin and malicious representations of the ultimate truthfulness known as true fact. #truthcrusaders! Disclaimer: I am not a spokesman for the movement, but merely its disciple... thus my words and beliefs are bound to be questioned believers and infidels alike. #Truth4ever Edit: updated post to remove all slander, bias and lies.
Edited by Tamaeon - 23 Jan 2015 at 00:59 |
|||
|
"How happy is the blameless vestal's lot! The world forgetting, by the world forgot. Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind! Each prayer accepted, and each wish resigned."
|
|||
![]() |
|||
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jan 2015 at 23:53 |
||
|
Rill - I expected you to pass it off as a joke but context is everything and in context of your regular H? bashing at the time I don't believe your attempt to excuse it.
It's not the first time you've tried to re-write your historical attitudes, I don't expect it to be the last. |
|||
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|||
![]() |
|||
Tamaeon
Wordsmith
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Location: Centrum Status: Offline Points: 152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jan 2015 at 22:16 |
||
|
=== deleted ===
Edited by Tamaeon - 23 Jan 2015 at 13:20 |
|||
|
"How happy is the blameless vestal's lot! The world forgetting, by the world forgot. Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind! Each prayer accepted, and each wish resigned."
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 6903 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jan 2015 at 20:35 |
||
|
I want to add that in light of the atmosphere at the time, I perhaps should have realized that my joke might well be misunderstood and refrained from making it. There are always two parties in a communication, and the sender as well as the receiver bear responsibility.
It seems clear that my joke contributed to distrust, suspicion or hostility. I apologize. Again, Harmless? is NOT evil.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 6903 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jan 2015 at 20:20 |
||
|
Yes, KillerPoodle, I believe that Harmless? is an evil plant fostered by the Melders in southern Elgea that eats troops.
Or maybe I was just referring to the fact that Harmless? has powerful armies in Southern Elgea that eat troops. I honestly do think there is some fundamental attribution error going on in the way you have understood that comment. What I was intending to do was obliquely compliment the military power of Harmless? by comparing you to a feature in Illy that consumes troops. I also was intending to make light of perceptions that I was anti-Harmless? in some way. However, because you believed that I was in fact prejudiced against you, you over-read my joke as meaning that I believed you were evil. I am very sorry that you drew this conclusion. Again, I intended my comment both as a plaudit to H?'s military strength and a gently poking fun at the idea I might suggest that you were somehow "evil." I do regret that my humor was misconstrued. As Angrim has said, perhaps in the atmosphere that then existed, this was inevitable, but I hope we can turn over a new page. I DO disagree with some things that Harmless? has done in the past, but I do NOT believe you are evil. Just in case you or anyone is still worried about that.
Edited by Rill - 22 Jan 2015 at 20:29 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Tamaeon
Wordsmith
Joined: 19 Dec 2011 Location: Centrum Status: Offline Points: 152 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jan 2015 at 19:43 |
||
I don't think this disclosure is necessary, but I want issue a fair warning to any of the alliances involved in the war. Sharing the Terms of Surrender in private or disclosing them to the larger public is a direct violation of multilateral agreements and may lead to repercussions. Unless of course, the alliances involved agree to the disclosure of terms. I've said before that I personally don't object to disclosure, though I cannot speak for anyone but myself. In fact my blessing no longer matters, as the alliance which I led during the war no longer exists. However, I still have access to the leaders of the GA alliances and would be happy to lobby for their approval, provided the Coalition agrees to the release of terms from previous wars. I would much prefer the terms can be disclosed in a new thread. |
|||
|
"How happy is the blameless vestal's lot! The world forgetting, by the world forgot. Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind! Each prayer accepted, and each wish resigned."
|
|||
![]() |
|||
GM Rikoo
Moderator Group
Community & PR Manager Joined: 28 Mar 2014 Location: Mars Status: Offline Points: 1233 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jan 2015 at 19:25 |
||
|
Let me clear something up, especially because talking about rules can be a bit... cloudy. I do not intend it that way at all, especially about a topic like sharing private information.
If the alliances in this thread want to share something that was alliance-wide and shared with others, like a Terms of Surrender, go for it. I'm like anyone else and enjoy these type of discussions. But, you still cannot share "Here's a copy/paste of an IGM, see where he calls me a jerk?!" -- that will lead to nothing but ruin. Understand that if someone takes this a chance to name-call or wreck the thread, I will delete their posts. Most of the posters in this thread are just wanting to see how it all played out. If anyone has an issue with anything that gets posted, let me know and I will review it. Keep it civil. And someone write all of this down and press it into fine leather for me? Thanks. I can't possibly read ALL of this every day. ha GM Rikoo
|
|||
|
Illyriad Community Manager / Public Relations / community@illyriad.co.uk
|
|||
![]() |
|||
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jan 2015 at 18:55 |
||
|
I think the issue is that we (H?) try to say as closely as possible exactly what we mean and specifically no more and no less. It seems to me that others treat conversation differently. Example: In conversations with Halcyon about NC/Bane I said (exact quote):
"If you guys decide to join then that will be a definite escalation and I foresee a chain reaction which ends up pulling most of the top 20 alliances including eventually H?" This was interpreted as "H? will defend NC no matter what they do" Things would be a whole lot simpler if folk would just ask us instead of re-interpreting our words based on their own subjective idea about what we *must* be thinking: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error On the flip side - when Rill says in GC that H? are evil and the new heart of corruption is our capital city then we'll take those words as a face value read on what Rill really thinks of us. |
|||
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|||
![]() |
|||
Angrim
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jan 2015 at 17:21 |
||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Shûl-nak
Wordsmith
Warpainter Joined: 23 Dec 2014 Status: Offline Points: 197 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 Jan 2015 at 17:01 |
||
|
After the court diplomats and scholars had finally finished dissecting the oft-heated public correspondence surrounding the Dwarf Lord Orin's attempt to compile an accurate account of the Great War, (generally to pantomime choruses of laughter, booing and clapping from the assembled court) Chief Shûl-nak stood to deliver his ultimate verdict over the tangled tapestry of history laid before him:
Seconds passed. "Is there.. is there something wrong with the chief's eyes?" whispered a visiting human to his guide. "Ah," responded the wise-orc tasked with preventing the (early) consumption of guests, "this what happen when you try commune with the Always-Chief of histories. Eyes go crazy when try to follow the Truth. No easy test..."
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 7891011 23> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |