The Golden Horde Landclaim |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1 3456> |
| Author | |
Turgon of Rhavenia 
New Poster 
Joined: 06 Dec 2017 Status: Offline Points: 38 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 20 Dec 2017 at 16:35 |
|
All I'm gonna say is this whole situation is too funny. GH claiming anything besides insanity, *rolls eyes*
|
|
 |
|
|
Sister Nikki
Greenhorn 
Joined: 16 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2017 at 16:13 |
|
Bill you are amazing !!! Thanks a lot for helping to understand the whole situation :-b
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Cipher
Wordsmith 
Joined: 28 Mar 2016 Location: The Universe Status: Offline Points: 180 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2017 at 16:04 |
As I understand it She was the right to stay where she is because there is no land claim as put on the GH alliance profile. with that anyone cant tell someone where they can and can't have their towns especially since there is NOT a land claim. She was sieged because she was "In GH land claim" But to reinforce it there is not a land claim. The IGM was because of the land claim. A warning then an attack was sent following the IGM. It comes down to the fact that Golden Horde AND Sabbathius attacked a newb with NO REASON
Edited by Bill Cipher - 19 Dec 2017 at 16:04 |
|
|
d-a-r-o-r-w-o pb wlph kdv frph wr exuq. l lqyrnh wkh dqflhqw srzhu wkdw l pdb uhwxuq
|
|
|
|
|
Sister Nikki
Greenhorn
Joined: 16 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 76 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2017 at 13:27 |
|
Yes that is the major question !!! Does a new player like KLipstA's stay where she is ? I could also ask why she was sieged in the first place.. According to above mentioned IGM was it an action of the Land Claim ?
|
|
|
|
|
eowan the short
Postmaster 
Joined: 03 Jan 2016 Location: UK Status: Online Points: 937 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2017 at 12:56 |
|
Oh, so then KLiPstA's town is free to stay where it is now?
|
|
|
|
|
Yitshak
Wordsmith
Joined: 28 Apr 2016 Status: Offline Points: 179 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2017 at 11:21 |
|
According to their profile they do not have a land claim.
|
|
|
Remember to be nice to the squirrel.
|
|
|
|
|
Sabbathius
New Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2017 Status: Offline Points: 1 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2017 at 11:04 |
|
We do not have a land claim, Eeowan is just a troll
|
|
|
|
|
eowan the short
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Jan 2016 Location: UK Status: Online Points: 937 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2017 at 04:27 |
|
Yes, Bruce Lee
|
|
|
|
|
Fiona
Wordsmith
Joined: 02 Jul 2014 Status: Offline Points: 139 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2017 at 04:19 |
|
Oh I guess the IGM did produce a question. Who is Bruce? Could that be Bruce Lee?
|
|
|
|
|
IKnight
New Poster
Joined: 25 Apr 2016 Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2017 at 04:15 |
That IGM is only a confirmation of a land claim declaration. I would think it's ok. Although I'm sure some will disagree.
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 3456> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Sister Nikki wrote: