| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
The Con Orc 
Greenhorn
Joined: 07 Dec 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 79
|
 Posted: 08 Dec 2010 at 18:18 |
gratch way to go.
almost killed us
|
 |
HonoredMule
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
|
Posted: 07 Dec 2010 at 22:33 |
|
The D'Haran Empire comes from the Sword of Truth series.
|
|
King EAM
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Location: Nun'ya
Status: Offline
Points: 272
|
Posted: 07 Dec 2010 at 20:51 |
I have no clue what book/movie you guys are talking about earlier.
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 06 Dec 2010 at 21:08 |
 Gratch wrote:
Ok to clear up a few things;
Upon re-reading the descripton, it comes off a bit worse than planned. The alliance is more in-line with Richard's ideas. A unification of the lands which could not defend themselves. Not a conquest of them. As such I will, when I get the time change the description.
Also, this alliance is in no way geared to conquest and in no way militarily aggressive. It is meant entirely to protect those who wish to join and create a community alliance one who can talk, help each other and request stuff from one another.
If you saw the first post i made in the alliance thread it probably explains it better than here...
I am sorry if I gave the wrong picture, but the alliance is in no way aiming for the same as TMM.
Noone is forced to join. It is an option that will not be met with force if you refuse and the alliance is also open to NAP and confederations with others.
Hopefully this explains things better and no longer gives the alliance a bad name it doesn't deserve...
Gratch
|
Gratch,
Thanks for clearing that up. There for a while, I thought you were saying your alliance is "above the law". I, for one, am very happy to hear that this is not the case. 
TD
|
|
Gratch
Wordsmith
Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 150
|
Posted: 06 Dec 2010 at 17:47 |
|
Ok to clear up a few things;
Upon re-reading the descripton, it comes off a bit worse than planned. The alliance is more in-line with Richard's ideas. A unification of the lands which could not defend themselves. Not a conquest of them. As such I will, when I get the time change the description.
Also, this alliance is in no way geared to conquest and in no way militarily aggressive. It is meant entirely to protect those who wish to join and create a community alliance one who can talk, help each other and request stuff from one another.
If you saw the first post i made in the alliance thread it probably explains it better than here...
I am sorry if I gave the wrong picture, but the alliance is in no way aiming for the same as TMM.
Noone is forced to join. It is an option that will not be met with force if you refuse and the alliance is also open to NAP and confederations with others.
Hopefully this explains things better and no longer gives the alliance a bad name it doesn't deserve...
Gratch
|
|
some random guy
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Location: saturn
Status: Offline
Points: 378
|
Posted: 05 Dec 2010 at 20:12 |
|
Panis was in a short story called "Debt of Bones", although he never actually said anything.
|
|
lorre
Forum Warrior
Joined: 29 Jun 2010
Location: Groot Kortrijk
Status: Offline
Points: 446
|
Posted: 05 Dec 2010 at 15:22 |
|
cause i watch em? XD
|
|
The battlefield is a scene of constant chaos. The winner will be the one who controls that chaos, both his own and the enemies.
Napoleon Bonaparte
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 04 Dec 2010 at 20:58 |
Gratch wrote:
This alliance is against those who would be against the members of this alliances' freedoms to play how they wish to play.
|
So this alliance writes its own rules and dares the rest of Illy to stop them?
If so, how is this alliance different from TMM?
|
|
HonoredMule
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
|
Posted: 04 Dec 2010 at 20:23 |
|
Darken Rahl continued the legacy of a rule established by Panis (or so we assume in the absence of any information about a grandfather). I just think the tone of speech sounds a little more consistent with pre-Richard ideals.
|
|
Gratch
Wordsmith
Joined: 18 Nov 2010
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 150
|
Posted: 04 Dec 2010 at 15:20 |
|
Panis Rahl or Richard's? But Panis Rahl's wasn't shown in the books even... Darken Rahl's was...
I'd like to say this a post Richard D'Hara, one keeping to his general idea though. The Enemies are those who choose to be enemies. This alliance is against those who would be against the members of this alliances' freedoms to play how they wish to play.
Hopefully that explains well enough for you
|
|
Tweet
The D'Haran Empire Second Calling!