The balance of power... |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | |
bansisdead
Postmaster
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 609 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 05:47 |
|
Aurodan there were always bigger alliances to push BSH about. I cannot speak for previous BSH administrations, but BSH is under new leadership now and I sincerely doubt NVP is about to start bullying smaller alliances.
Personally I think Brandmeister is spot on. |
|
![]() |
|
Kumomoto
Postmaster General
Joined: 19 Oct 2009 Status: Offline Points: 2224 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 05:18 |
|
It's over now, so... We'll see how The Grand Alliance will conduct themselves. Hopefully better than they did in the war. I have no interest in staying in a game where folks are regularly sieged out of the game. Two continents will also make things quite different, I believe...
|
|
![]() |
|
Velociryx
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Location: Myrtle Beach, S Status: Offline Points: 45 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 04:26 |
|
Yes KP, but you know...that's "different." ;)
(funny how it's *always* "different when we do it") - magic! Edited by Velociryx - 20 Jul 2014 at 04:27 |
|
![]() |
|
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(4)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 04:20 |
|
Aurodan - lets compare and contrast what H? vs Vultures and friends did with their power.
On one hand you have an alliance who setup the server wide code of conduct about protecting new players and training alliances. Who actually aborted more wars than most people realize and who went through a whole bunch of diplomacy to try to prevent another server wide war. The one major war they did then enter (and remember there was only 1 war dec from H? followed by 6+ from the other side) that some folk (Rill) are using as justification for the current dog pile, lasted 6 months and ended with at most two players (debatable that it's even two) reduced by more than 30% of their accounts and peace settlements which totaled <10bill gold across 8 alliances with individuals leaving the war for approx 50million. The "victims" of that war bounced back in a relatively short time to mastermind the next server war for revenge - one which laid waste to most of an entire alliance, upwards of 50 accounts (an probably closer to 100) reduced to 1 city, 40 billion in gold compensation (and counting) and extortions of 1 *billion* gold for single players to exit the war. Plus all the other terms alliances had to suffer (no more than 10K troops, no participating in tourneys on XYZ square under threat of resumption of war, etrc etc etc.). Your sycophantic posts of love about the latter group of folk are making you look kinda ridiculous. Edited by KillerPoodle - 20 Jul 2014 at 04:47 |
|
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
|
![]() |
|
Angrim
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Nov 2011 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 1173 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 02:18 |
|
Mr Damage has the way of it. H? was unassailable so long as its power bloc remained intact and its opposition fragmented.
|
|
![]() |
|
Aurordan
Postmaster
Player Council - Ambassador Joined: 21 Sep 2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 982 |
Post Options
Thanks(3)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 01:29 |
|
I'm sure we'll all yearn for the good old days of H? beating people down over Trove mines and NC and friends' constant wars against anyone they decided they didn't like. I'm glad BSH, an alliance who would never dream of using it's size and militarism to push other alliances around, is on top of this issue. I should stop now. I've gone way over my recommended daily dose of sarcasm.
Edited by Aurordan - 20 Jul 2014 at 01:33 |
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(4)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 01:27 |
|
One massive, monolithic block of permasat accounts is giving way to a large confederation of permasat accounts. If the devs ever halt the rampant multi-accounting in this game, none of the emperors will have any clothes. A system cleanse would return power to alliances consisting of active, engaged players. That is, incidentally, where the power belongs.
|
|
![]() |
|
Velociryx
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Location: Myrtle Beach, S Status: Offline Points: 45 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 00:34 |
|
Depends...we talking the Borg Collective? ;)
|
|
![]() |
|
Spheniscidae
Wordsmith
Joined: 01 Mar 2012 Status: Offline Points: 117 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 00:29 |
|
Power in Illyriad is now multipolar, held by multiple alliances in a confederation with one another. Previously, it was unipolar - concentrated in one alliance.
I fail to see how the substitution of a hegemon for a collective can be anything but positive for the game.
|
|
![]() |
|
bansisdead
Postmaster
Joined: 08 Jan 2012 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 609 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 Jul 2014 at 00:19 |
|
Rill, I hope you are right, but looking at the top ten alliances I cannot see that hope coming into fruition. If there is the slightest truth in my fears then that spells disaster for the future of Illyriad.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |