| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
The_Dude 
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
 Posted: 30 Dec 2010 at 19:34 |
 King EAM wrote:
Whoa...  |
I'm guessing that is shock at my statment regarding 100% health...
If your Cmdr has a battle at 100% and loses 25% health. Now he is at 75%. And lets say his health is now 75/100
In his next battle, again he loses 25% health...This time it is 75 health x 25% = 18.75...so 19 points lost ...remaining health = 56.
As long as he wins the battle, no matter his starting health, he will survive (excepting Defy Death randomness).
Battle 1 (16% damage)
|
Commander: Yeoman |
Yeoman |
1 |
Damaged for 16, 84 health remains. |
2nd battle less than 1 hour later (8% Damage):
|
Commander: Yeoman |
Yeoman |
1 |
Damaged for 7, 81 health remains. |
Edited by The_Dude - 30 Dec 2010 at 19:38
|
 |
kicking5251
Wordsmith
Joined: 16 Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 139
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2010 at 05:07 |
well back to the original topic....
I still can't get over the fact that fluffy took on more than 5x his company size and won |
|
some random guy
Forum Warrior
Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Location: saturn
Status: Offline
Points: 378
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2010 at 19:08 |
|
Good commanders. They have a HUGE effect on the outcome of battles.
|
|
Soon, very soon, my name will become synonymous with chicken alfredo.... mmm.... chicken alfredo....
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2010 at 19:35 |
I don't think that Fluffy's outcome was heavily influenced by commanders. First off, Fluffy was on attack with T2 Cav leading T1 swords. So leader divisional attack bonuses were not applicable.
Also, Fluffy attack with 662 units vs. 1926 units. Roughly a 1:3 ratio which he just eeked out a win with. But this ratio of 1:3 is about what I experience when I attacked NPC's. So I think this outcome was predicitable to be close as it was.
|
|
fluffy
Forum Warrior
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 335
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2010 at 21:55 |
|
actually, both my commanders are fully leveled in personal attack and axeman division bonus :)
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2010 at 22:01 |
|
As I understand Divisional Attack Bonuses are only applied to the same unit type as the Cmdr. So your Runerider Cmdrs would only apply Divisional Attack bonuses to Cav units under thier command. The Axemen would receive no Divisional Attack bonus from the Runerider Cmdrs.
|
|
fluffy
Forum Warrior
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 335
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2010 at 22:08 |
|
why would there be divisional attack bonuses for other unit types then? If an axemen couldn't recieve a bonus from a runerider commander, why would that skill even be available then?
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2010 at 22:23 |
|
Those Attack bonuses are telling what type of Defending Unit the bonus applies to. So a Runerider with Division Sword Attack bonus will apply that bonus to his division's Runeriders attacking Sword units.
Edited by The_Dude - 31 Dec 2010 at 22:24
|
|
fluffy
Forum Warrior
Joined: 02 Mar 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 335
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2010 at 22:48 |
according to this it isn't
|
|
The_Dude
Postmaster General
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Status: Offline
Points: 2396
|
Posted: 31 Dec 2010 at 23:23 |
|
ok, i'm lost then.
|
|
Tweet
The Almost Perfect Battle