After some debate in Global about the impact of terrain, Zangi and I decided to do some controlled tests.
We agreed to use 100 basic dwarf bowmen (99 Slingers plus unbonused commander) vs 20 Human cavalry (19 + unbonused commander).
This gives a nice comparison because 20 cavalry have an attack strength of 1300 (65*20) and Slingers have a defence against cavalry of 13 so the armies are equal when the cavalry are attacking the slingers.
First test was on a mountain square type "Lonely Peak":
Sent By: System Received By: KillerPoodle Sent: 27AUG10 06:09 Subject: Failed attack against Zangi's forces at Square -139|-62 by KillerPoodle's forces from Poodleopolis
Two opposing forces clash against each other.
Swordsmen, and especially cavalry, find attacking into very mountainous terrain difficult - although ranged units can excel.
Narrow passes and gulleys hinder any mounted units' ability to defend adequately. Nimble spear units have no such worries here, and defending bowmen are able to use their height advantage to maximum effect. Attackers: Unit: Quantity: Casualties: Survivors: Commander: cav Knight 1 Damaged for 100, 0 health remains. Troops: Knights 19 19 0
Despite your troops' defeat, word reaches you concerning the defenders' forces in this battle.
Defenders: Unit: Quantity: Casualties: Survivors: Commander: Pebbles Slinger 1 Damaged for 53, 47 health remains. Troops: Slingers 99 53 46
|
As you can see - rather than this being a close fight the terrain gave a significant advantage to the bows.
Edited by KillerPoodle - 27 Aug 2010 at 16:03