Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Surrender terms for wars in Illyriad
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Surrender terms for wars in Illyriad

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4567>
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 1 Votes, Average 4.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote HonoredMule Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 01:08
Originally posted by BellusRex BellusRex wrote:

I don't believe the same can be said of other alliances


Well you would be quite wrong.  I'm pretty sure no such justification was ever used by any alliance.  There's a case where Harmless would certainly like to, regarding someone who has been the most passive-aggressive and damaging force in the game.  But we've never been in direct conflict with this socially destructive player whose slander and direct personal attacks far outweigh what any army could do.

We've certainly complained about such reprehensible behavior and sometimes even within the same discussion.  But our in-game punishments have always been measured against a combination of personal military involvement and active participation through political or strategic leadership.  The loss of cities has always been reserved for key players who held the bulk of responsibility for conflicts which should not have happened, and when taken post-war, particularly in cases where those key players led from back lines and let others suffer the losses for them.

That is what can no longer be said of other alliances.

Edited by HonoredMule - 21 Feb 2014 at 01:08
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now."
- HonoredMule
Back to Top
BellusRex View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jul 2011
Location: Mountains
Status: Offline
Points: 156
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BellusRex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 04:18
Honored Mule, you may have forgotten, but H? demanded loss of cities from EE members for exactly the reasons I stated. Their posts were deemed "offensive" and "trollish". We do still have the actual correspondence which stated those demands in as arrogant an insulting way as possible.

I would like to see where any terms offered or accepted in this conflict made any similar demands, or delivered them in such a disparaging manner.
"War is the father of all things..."
Back to Top
HonoredMule View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote HonoredMule Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 06:54
Why don't you send me some names/specifics in-game?  A lot of things were said mostly in a non-official capacity, but with specific account and alliance names I can probably find the records of final terms and the actual specific reasons we worked out internally.  I can't really speak for whatever other reasons were piled on for good measure during likely heated discussions.

In this current war, you would be hard pressed to find any on our side trolling even remotely so hard as both sides did to a deeply regrettable degree in the last war.  Even in the last war, you'll have a harder time finding people on our side lashing out with hurtful personal attacks or pure slander.  If they did intentionally and repeatedly, I would consider it a perfectly reasonable grounds for substantial reprisal anyway.


Edited by HonoredMule - 21 Feb 2014 at 07:00
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now."
- HonoredMule
Back to Top
scaramouche View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 432
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote scaramouche Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 07:47
Originally posted by HonoredMule HonoredMule wrote:








Why don't you send me some names/specifics in-game?  A lot of things were said mostly in a non-official capacity, but with specific account and alliance names I can probably find the records of final terms and the actual specific reasons we worked out internally.  I can't really speak for whatever other reasons were piled on for good measure during likely heated discussions.

In this current war, you would be hard pressed to find any on our side trolling even remotely so hard as both sides did to a deeply regrettable degree in the last war.  Even in the last war, you'll have a harder time finding people on our side lashing out with hurtful personal attacks or pure slander.  If they did intentionally and repeatedly, I would consider it a perfectly reasonable grounds for substantial reprisal anyway.



Wrong HM.....I witnessed atrocious personal attacks in GC from KP and another alliance leader on your side against RMY that disgusted me...that two so called mature adults could resort to behaving the way they did to a female player in a " GAME " was and is totally beyond me.
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
Back to Top
KillerPoodle View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1853
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KillerPoodle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 16:08

Regarding RMY - all I ever did was point out where she was lying, trolling and generally displaying rank hypocrisy.

Show me any log where I did otherwise.

"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
Back to Top
Starry View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 20 Mar 2010
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 612
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Starry Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 16:16
I'm going to stop you right now, unless you were in Toothless and witnessed the abuse and controversy she created in that peaceful training alliance, you don't know the full story.   I was Chancellor of T?, Luvs was also in T and I still have records of all the deception and yes, abusive behavior she created against the alliance, staff and members (new players).

RMY was a drama queen who liked to paint herself as the wounded party when, in fact, she created the problems herself.    Any comments posted by T or H staff were fully justified.   Find something else to dredge up, this one doesn't cut it.  


CEO, Harmless?
Founder of Toothless?

"Truth never dies."
-HonoredMule

Back to Top
scaramouche View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 432
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote scaramouche Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 19:05
I do not know the past history before I started playing illy of what has happened with you and RMY and drama queen or not, there is NO excuse for anyone to be treated like she was that particular night
KP you was obviously drunk that night and on one of your infamous GC rants...some of the things said made me wince and I aint no angel.
My point is HM stated things have not been said on your side that was ever personal...and I can witness he is wrong!
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
Back to Top
KillerPoodle View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1853
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KillerPoodle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 19:22
I think you are confusing me with someone else.  I actually have the logs saved from that night and nothing I said was improper.
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM

"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill
Back to Top
Sir A View Drop Down
Wordsmith
Wordsmith
Avatar

Joined: 26 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 121
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sir A Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 20:01
Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:

I think you are confusing me with someone else.  I actually have the logs saved from that night and nothing I said was improper.

Heres some quotes taken from a thread Angrim made about the nature of the Crowfed a few months back that shows some "not-so-subtle" threats made by KP to people that posted in that thread.  This was a few weeks before the current war began, I wont comment on what was said because I don't want to put any of my spin on it.  The thread is locked so I don't think you can edit your posts on there anymore but I know KP can be such a tricky poodle so I took screenshots in case Sleepy.  
 

Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:

Originally posted by Redfist Redfist wrote:


blah blah blah   


Hi Ossian - nice new name you have there.

P.S. Redfist had written 2 paragraphs that KP was amazingly able to shorten to blah blah blah for our reading convenience Shocked.  

Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:

Originally posted by Le Roux Le Roux wrote:

it is nearly impossible to paint the crowfed with a single brush . . .


That may be true, however many folk in this thread seem to be speaking on behalf of the entire crowalition ("The crowfed does this" , "the crowfed did that") and in that context they are painting themselves with a single brush.

Originally posted by KillerPoodle KillerPoodle wrote:


Originally posted by Le Roux Le Roux wrote:


"Bloc Quebecois" 


Is that a kind of cheese?  Wink

These are just a few highlights but you can check out the original thread if you want to read some of the interesting things that were discussed on the forums just before this war began.  The thread is locked so its like a bit of history frozen in time.  You can find it here:
http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/the-nature-of-the-crows_topic5268_page1.html
Back to Top
Nokigon View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Historian

Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nokigon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Feb 2014 at 21:10
I don't see anything wrong with those posts. The third one was a joke.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4567>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.