Surrender terms for wars in Illyriad |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 23456 7> |
| Author | ||
KillerPoodle
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1853 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 01:13 |
|
The side that is winning has the choice - to cripple/destroy their opponent, or not. The fact that you also chose to blame the ones who are being destroyed just compounds your lack of honor. |
||
|
"This is a bad idea and we shouldn't do it." - endorsement by HM
"a little name-calling is a positive thing." - Rill |
||
![]() |
||
Qaal
Wordsmith
Joined: 29 Jan 2011 Status: Offline Points: 115 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 02:32 |
|
|
Reparations to losers is a noble idea, but I think it misses the point with regard to what most puts the losing side of an Illy war behind the curve. Reparations are generally negotiable, but attrition isn't. And in the end, attrition hit us harder in the wake of the Trove War than did reparations.
|
||
![]() |
||
Elmindra
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 464 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 02:43 |
|
|
Wait, losing 37 more towns on top of gold and T2 resources is designed to only set an alliance back a month or 2 at most? On top of towns lost during war, not counting towns exodus'd during war?
Not sure how you come back from that in a month or two, unless you have very large stocks of basics already stored in hubs and are willing to use quite a bit of prestige.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
jcx
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Oct 2013 Location: Tallimar Status: Offline Points: 281 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 04:03 |
|
|
Surrender Terms - must always favor the winning side.
Losing side should always pay reparations demanded by the winning side. don't vent the logic. ![]() |
||
|
Disclaimer: The above is jcx|orcboy's personal opinion and is not the opinion or policy of Harmless? [H?] or of the little green men that have been following him all day.
jcx in H? | orcboy in H? |
||
![]() |
||
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 07:25 |
|
Weeeelll ... if you see the timeline of the two wars it is apparent that this is exactly what happened ... besides aren't you the one who has been bragging for a couple of months now of how battleworthy your account is, about at least 300% troop sov and how you are "stronger than ever" and in such a short time .?. ![]() Sometimes bragging can seriously cripple your future arguments. Keep that in mind next time |
||
![]() |
||
Epidemic
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Nov 2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 768 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 09:13 |
|
This is the farmville of wargames, no wonder you only lasted 7 days on Tribal Wars. You 'warmongers' don't understand just how good you have it here. This is a joke. Go find a real wargame and see how far you get tough guy... |
||
![]() |
||
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian Joined: 07 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1452 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 10:14 |
|
|
I don't really see why everyone is wailing about how the current environment is leading to the ruin of all of Illy. Joining in a war is not, by any means, a necessity. Epidemic himself is proof that you don't have to fight in a war if you don't want to.
|
||
![]() |
||
Elmindra
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 464 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 11:54 |
|
I know basic math is hard, but that war concluded almost a full year ago. Last I saw, a year had 12 months instead of 1 or 2. I personally did not lose as much as many of my alliance mates, but it was 6 months after the war before I was back up to near full strength. Timeline of the two wars my left foot, if the above happened we would have been back at war in a month or two as Kp stated, not over 7 months later.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
Deranzin
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Oct 2011 Status: Offline Points: 845 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 12:32 |
|
Indeed math seems hard ... let us check the facts then Topic by Hathaldir: Eagles Eyrie surrenders to Harmless? Posted: 03 Apr 2013 at 12:25 Link : http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/eagles-eyrie-surrenders-to-harmless_topic4935.html Next topic by Aral :Topic: Discussing the Current War Posted: 27 Oct 2013 at 02:24 Link : http://forum.illyriad.co.uk/discussing-the-current-war_topic5289.html So this means that April - May- June you were back on your feet, so the timeline/prediction of setting "alliances back by a month or two at most" is accurate. July - August - September you had returned to full battle readiness (troops do take time to build in this game) and were confident to wage war again. Am I counting something wrong .?. And since when 6 months is a year .?. ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
scaramouche
Forum Warrior
Joined: 25 Apr 2011 Status: Offline Points: 432 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Feb 2014 at 16:54 |
|
So..knowing this now.. and if you could turn time back, would your terms have been much harsher? Surely you should have known that the consone war would create bitter people with a grudge? I have no doubt that this war will have created very much the same people that will one day in the future look for the same retribution. |
||
|
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
|
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 23456 7> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |