Surrender terms for wars in Illyriad

Why don't you send me some names/specifics in-game?  A lot of things were said mostly in a non-official capacity, but with specific account and alliance names I can probably find the records of final terms and the actual specific reasons we worked out internally.  I can't really speak for whatever other reasons were piled on for good measure during likely heated discussions.

In this current war, you would be hard pressed to find any on our side trolling even remotely so hard as both sides did to a deeply regrettable degree in the last war.  Even in the last war, you'll have a harder time finding people on our side lashing out with hurtful personal attacks or pure slander.  If they did intentionally and repeatedly, I would consider it a perfectly reasonable grounds for substantial reprisal anyway.


Edited by HonoredMule - 21 Feb 2014 at 07:00

BellusRex wrote: I don't believe the same can be said of other alliances

Well you would be quite wrong.  I'm pretty sure no such justification was ever used by any alliance.  There's a case where Harmless would certainly like to, regarding someone who has been the most passive-aggressive and damaging force in the game.  But we've never been in direct conflict with this socially destructive player whose slander and direct personal attacks far outweigh what any army could do.

We've certainly complained about such reprehensible behavior and sometimes even within the same discussion.  But our in-game punishments have always been measured against a combination of personal military involvement and active participation through political or strategic leadership.  The loss of cities has always been reserved for key players who held the bulk of responsibility for conflicts which should not have happened, and when taken post-war, particularly in cases where those key players led from back lines and let others suffer the losses for them.

That is what can no longer be said of other alliances.

Edited by HonoredMule - 21 Feb 2014 at 01:08

Rill wrote: I thought it was deliberate, Qaal, like an affectionate nickname.

Well, because it clearly relates to what he said, and as you so astutely pointed out, with lots of headache-inducing font changes and emotes, you weren't discussing that particular issue?    

Aurordan wrote: That second paragraph was a response to statements by your Director in this very thread.  Not everything is about you.

Then quote that part or at least refer to that poster ... if you quote only me, then how is someone reading your post supposed to understand what you have in your mind and who you are talking to .?.