Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Surrender terms for wars in Illyriad
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Surrender terms for wars in Illyriad
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 7>
Author
 Rating: Topic Rating: 1 Votes, Average 4.00  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
ickyfritz View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn
Avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2012
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 40 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ickyfritz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 17:16
I think simply eliminating reparations might be the better strategy. Everyone takes their licks and bears the brunt of their own costs for waging war.  Wars would be shorter since the pain of surrender reenforces the reluctance to do so.  If you grind them into the dust you won't have any problems later, but then you have dust for a neighbor.  Terms don't have to be generous, just not punitive.

I can easily see how reparations to the loser could be used as a twisted tool of the truly Machiavellian.  I see how it would induce wars that wouldn't naturally occur in the natural order of things.  Smaller alliances with nothing to lose could in fact achieve certain strategic goals during the course of the war (even as a loser) and receive reparations to boot. 

just another opinion...
Back to Top
ES2 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ES2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 17:19
Originally posted by ickyfritz ickyfritz wrote:

I think simply eliminating reparations might be the better strategy. Everyone takes their licks and bears the brunt of their own costs for waging war.  Wars would be shorter since the pain of surrender reenforces the reluctance to do so.  If you grind them into the dust you won't have any problems later, but then you have dust for a neighbor.  Terms don't have to be generous, just not punitive.

I can easily see how reparations to the loser could be used as a twisted tool of the truly Machiavellian.  I see how it would induce wars that wouldn't naturally occur in the natural order of things.  Smaller alliances with nothing to lose could in fact achieve certain strategic goals during the course of the war (even as a loser) and receive reparations to boot. 

just another opinion...


Can people keep the resources stored in hubs even when they lose their cities? If so, then they could just stash all the advanced resources they want in hubs, then when they rebuild their cities they could pull them out of the hubs. 
Eternal Fire
Back to Top
Brandmeister View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 2396 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Brandmeister Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 17:31
I was under the impression that when your last city is destroyed, all your items in the hubs are destroyed as well. Is that not the case?
Back to Top
ES2 View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 550 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ES2 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 17:35
Originally posted by Brandmeister Brandmeister wrote:

I was under the impression that when your last city is destroyed, all your items in the hubs are destroyed as well. Is that not the case?

I have no idea
Eternal Fire
Back to Top
Ander View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 24 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1269 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ander Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 17:50
Originally posted by Brandmeister Brandmeister wrote:

I was under the impression that when your last city is destroyed, all your items in the hubs are destroyed as well. Is that not the case?

There is no reason for that to happen. You could store resources in hubs without even having a trader. What is the connection with city getting destroyed?
Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 18:22
My understanding is that possessions in the hub remain even if your cities are destroyed.  I am not going to volunteer to test that theory, though.
Back to Top
Brandmeister View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2012
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 2396 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Brandmeister Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 18:23
Because when your last city is destroyed, you are kicked back to the newb ring. I understood that to basically be an account reset.
Back to Top
Deranzin View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 845 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Deranzin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 19:12
Originally posted by Brandmeister Brandmeister wrote:

Because when your last city is destroyed, you are kicked back to the newb ring. I understood that to basically be an account reset.


It all boils down to whether the account ID is reset as well or not ... I do not think it is, ergo you keep your stuff in the hubs ... Smile
Back to Top
Epidemic View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 03 Nov 2012
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 768 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Epidemic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 19:31
Why are we talking about accounts being wiped out and forced to restart in the newb circle like it's an everyday thing?

...and some of you still think this is a better Illy.

Go find a real wargame and leave Illy in peace!


Edited by Epidemic - 18 Feb 2014 at 19:32
Back to Top
Rill View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar
Player Council - Geographer

Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903 		Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Feb 2014 at 19:38
Although it is a rare event, it has happened in the past and will likely happen again in the future.  The fact that after more than a year of trade hubs being active no one has tested this question yet (so far as we know) speaks to how rare the occurrence is.

We DO know that it's not the same as an account reset, since the 0 population city retains all the research of the last city to be sieged.  Basically what keeps a player in the system's "memory" is the existence of a capital city on the map somewhere.  There are no circumstances under which an active account will not have at least one active city on the map -- this suggests that ownership of materials in hubs, which are not dependent on any particular city but are owned by the account, will be continuous even if all cities are sieged.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 7>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.