| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Silverlake
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
|
Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 06:13 |
All in good fun, can we hug now? Jane thanks for the Beer
|
 |
Jane DarkMagic
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Sep 2011
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 554
|
Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 06:06 |
I know that neither Angrim nor I meant anything critical of H?'s policy/request/recommendation, we were just trying to use it as a point of comparison in an academic-type(trying to think of a better word) discussion... Not as a direct comparison, but of an alliance making a request or recommendation of any type. Your's I think is very reasonable. STa's not at all reasonable. It's hard to find the correct language that won't offend anyone... But I know Angrim well in-game and he's not the type to get all hot and bothered about silly issues. I have more of a tendency but will always admit when I mean to be offensive, and not saying I've never said anything critical of H?(I did during the tourney for sure), but this is not one of those times! I've been similarly critical of people in my own alliance though(Ask Rill). I'm just a premature old crank that likes a good debate.
|
 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 02:13 |
Brids17 wrote:
Silverlake wrote:
I'm starting to get a complex that your alliance does like mine |
Why is it the moment someone says anything about H? you automatically call them out as not liking them? I think you're seeing what you want to see. |
It was meant in jest. I assumed that was rather obvious with all the past 'hug it out etc'. But for heavens sake Harmless are on the receiving end of more mud, accusation, jealousy, envy, subversion, metagaming and god knows what else than the rest of Illy combined so you'll excuse us for being a little quick on the draw.
|
|
"ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
 |
Silverlake
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
|
Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 02:11 |
Thank you Angrim.
Birds, LOL, "Someone," try three people from the same alliance, that's a collective behavior, just own it and move on.
|
 |
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 01:26 |
Silverlake wrote:
I'm starting to get a complex that your alliance does like mine |
Why is it the moment someone says anything about H? you automatically call them out as not liking them? I think you're seeing what you want to see.
|
|
|
 |
Angrim
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
|
Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 20:22 |
|
No hostility implied, Silverlake. Perhaps "warning" was poorly chosen, but I suspect StA also sees their announcement as a way to forestall conflict. In the original post, StA also invited communication regarding others who wanted to move to Farra. But behind both offers is the assertion of a right to deny any change to the status quo. It seems disingenuous to me to pretend that the threat of forcible removal is not backing up that request. It is the proverbial offer you can't refuse. In both cases I would rather understand the attitude of my potential neighbors before I move/settle, so in that way I'm happy to see these announcements posted whether I heed them or not.
|
 |
Silverlake
Forum Warrior
Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
|
Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 19:23 |
Angrim wrote:
In that way I do see it as analogous to the H? 10 sq radius warning, and that is where the similarity ends. |
One more time, it was a request to open up communications, not a warning, infer much? I'm starting to get a complex that your alliance does like mine  wanna hug it out?
|
 |
Angrim
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
|
Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 17:14 |
|
Posturing is part of any diplomatic relationship. StA has stated its intentions as a deterrent. They are entitled, imo, to do so. Whether the deterrent works or not is now in the hands of the other players. In that way I do see it as analogous to the H? 10 sq radius warning, and that is where the similarity ends. Anyone is capable of testing the resolve of either alliance, and should own any consequences that result.
|
 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch
Postmaster
Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
|
Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 17:13 |
Tordenkaffen wrote:
and I am surprised that you- or H? for that matter would object to people asking for a little personal space in terms of alliance location. So I am puzzled why you would be against it? |
I object to an alliance blanketly claiming a large named territory. I nor anyone else should not have to ask permission to move into a large territory. I fail to see why this is so puzzling.
Tordenkaffen wrote:
If you ask that people are reasonable when colonising close to H? you would assume H? members would extend the same courtesy to others no? | Once again. There is a huge difference in requesting dialogue before moving within an irrational distance to a city and outright claiming of a territory. I think apples and oranges and IM puzzled as to why so many fail to grasp this.
|
|
"ouch...best of luck." HonoredMule
|
 |
Tordenkaffen
Postmaster
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 821
|
Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 16:50 |
Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:
Duuvian wrote:
Existing players inhabiting Farra who desire to settle a new city there, I ask that you confer with the nearest StA member to the new city's location to see if they had any plans for the square and barring them having plans for a city there we should be able to accommodate you.
|
No.
I do not need, nor will, ask permission from any Sta member as that implies Sta ownership.
You cannot give what is not yours in the first place.
|
I think the term "ownership" is misunderstood here Llyorn - "home" or "place of belonging" would fit just as well, and I am surprised that you- or H? for that matter would object to people asking for a little personal space in terms of alliance location. But ok Llyorn we differ in opinion on this matter, not a big problem. I believe the quality of Illy is increased when players have an area to call "homebase" or what have you, as it gives them purpose direction and unity they could not attain otherwise imo. So I am puzzled why you would be against it? Lastly though I have to say that while asking permission and being diplomatic can be percieved as similar they do not have to be. If you ask that people are reasonable when colonising close to H? you would assume H? members would extend the same courtesy to others no? There is nothing confrontational intended with this post, but sooner or later Illy have to make some kind of policy about alliances and claims to local sovereignty so that we all know where we stand. Personally I see the scattered alliances as having a flaw in leadership as it is a painful but ultimately very beneficial excercise to ask your members to move their cities into the same area, as it increases the experience/sense of being "allied" with someone and adds value to the game itself that there in the great chaotic mix of cities is some tendency towards a structure and meaningfullness. Otherwise alliances will only orbit around the purpose of growing bigger, and thats a very 2-dimensional gameworld. No offense intended to anyone, just felt it had to be said eventually. And please stop giving StA grief over their hard work and team effort to carve out a place for themselves in Illy - most alliances have no idea of how taxing it can be on an alliance and it's members. Peace
|
 |