| Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452
|
Posted: 09 Feb 2012 at 15:46 |
|
Not a small one belonging to a 3k member, either.
|
 |
SugarFree
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Feb 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 350
|
Posted: 09 Feb 2012 at 15:49 |
Darkwords wrote:
basically the last time an alliance declared a region theirs, that alliance died. I expect if StA serious stood by their claim and actively prevented others settling on this island, or tried to force others that are there out; then history would repeat itself.
|
what a load of bull. there are alliance claimed regions that are about the size of ferra island and no one complains.
|
 |
Darkwords
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1005
|
Posted: 09 Feb 2012 at 16:14 |
SugarFree wrote:
Darkwords wrote:
basically the last time an alliance declared a region theirs, that alliance died. I expect if StA serious stood by their claim and actively prevented others settling on this island, or tried to force others that are there out; then history would repeat itself.
|
what a load of bull. there are alliance claimed regions that are about the size of ferra island and no one complains. |
SF you are obviously some sad little troll who does not have a clue what he/she is on about... so why do you keep commenting. there are no pure alliance claims on any land in elgea, learn a little about the game and its history if you want any experienced players to bother listening to you, or paying attention to your pointless posts.
|
 |
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian
Joined: 07 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 1452
|
Posted: 09 Feb 2012 at 17:42 |
SugarFree wrote:
Darkwords wrote:
basically the last time an alliance declared a region theirs, that alliance died. I expect if StA serious stood by their claim and actively prevented others settling on this island, or tried to force others that are there out; then history would repeat itself.
|
what a load of bull. there are alliance claimed regions that are about the size of ferra island and no one complains. |
Name three.
|
 |
SugarFree
Forum Warrior
Joined: 09 Feb 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 350
|
Posted: 09 Feb 2012 at 21:47 |
Nokigon wrote:
Name three. |
Curse, BSH, DLords, the Colony, Free ... this is just from what i see on world map.. i could go on..
Edited by SugarFree - 09 Feb 2012 at 21:49
|
 |
Darkwords
Postmaster General
Joined: 23 May 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1005
|
Posted: 09 Feb 2012 at 23:04 |
SugarFree wrote:
Nokigon wrote:
Name three. |
Curse, BSH, DLords, the Colony, Free ... this is just from what i see on world map..i could go on..
|
They are alliances, not land claims. It is only natural that alliances will congregate together for defensive strength, but you will also note that amongst them there are members of other alliances and also non-alligned players. Although considering proposed upgrades for this game, this tactic may well prove detrimental and leave an alliances reliant on others for certain resources.
|
 |
Jane DarkMagic
Postmaster
Joined: 10 Sep 2011
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 554
|
Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 01:32 |
To clarify what I was saying earlier: Land claims made in forums are only as effective as your ability to enforce them. I cam claim Keppen as entirely belonging to Jane Darkmagic, but the minute an alliance or one of the 1000 people militarily stronger than me decide to move to Keppen, the claim means nothing unless I can successfully back up my mouth and threats. I can say if you move to Keppen, I will see this as ample reason to attack you because I have put a flag there.. ("Have you got a flag? No flag, no country!) If in the process of me attacking you, your allies chase me down and raze all my cities to the ground it will be completely justified as well and my land claim will have been proven a very bad idea. However, if I have 100 people of similiar size in a radius and make the suggestion that settling near us is a bad idea, more people might listen, and the self-imposed claim might hold for a much more significant amount of time, but it still might escalate into World World 8 depending on the diplomacy and people involved. Not going to make the mistake of trying to use in-game examples this time, so hope you can see what I'm saying!
|
 |
Silent/Steadfast
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Jun 2011
Location: Pacific County
Status: Offline
Points: 553
|
Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 03:46 |
My take on this is that every player has the right to the 20 squares surrounding their city (all squares 1,2, square root of 2, and square root of, uh, 5) since those are the ones most likely to be claimed. Aside from that, any squares "claimed" must be able to be backed militaristically in case they are contested.
H?'s rule of 10 squares states that 10 is a guideline, and that closer than 10 squares is permitted if requested. This is perfectly reasonable, as H? has both the military backing and leniency to make this work. No one, as far as I know, has been forcibly removed by H? after following the guidelines put forward.
StA has laid claim to farra isle, which is a different kettle of carp entirely. "No cities will be permitted to be settled" essentially means that StA feels that they have ownership of farra, and can defend their claim if necessary. If StA allows other people to settle on their land a reasonable distance away, then there should be no issue.
However, what bugs me is that in StA *hasn't* actually claimed all of farra isle. Sure, they have many cities there, but even by saying that each of their cities has 20 theoretical sov squares around it means that there are substantial gaps in their claim.
If I were StA, I wouldn't have made this issue public. The placement of cities in a grid across farra isle would have guaranteed that their claim would have been little contested, as the land there isn't particularly desired, and the denizens of the forums wouldn't have picked their claim to pieces. That being said, StA will have to decide wether to support their claim and potentially war with others, or to back down, lay low, and spread like hell across farra isle before lawn can make is 11 settlers.
Edited by Silent/Steadfast - 10 Feb 2012 at 05:45
|
|
"Semantics are no protection from a 50 Megaton Thermonuclear Stormcrow."-Yggdrassil (June 21, 2011 6:48 PM) "SCROLL ya donut!" Urgorr The Old (September 1, 2011 4:08 PM)
|
 |
Duuvian
Greenhorn
Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 68
|
Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 06:04 |
|
If it's not ok for my member, Chaos Armor, to keep his established town that is being forced to exodus by a large alliance, I fail to see how it's wrong for StA to do the exact same thing in an area they have as good a reason to like to control as the people evicting Chaos Armor do his square. The only reasonable explanation if Chaos is forced to move AND StA can't do similar is that being mighty justifies what you do in Illyria. This would be a sad state of affairs. This is what posting about claiming Farra was trying to bring to your attention.
Chaos was invited to move to a spot on the mainland near another player. It seems that someone was occupying armies for a future claim a number of squares away from the location Chaos moved to. Chaos is being forced to exodus his existing city. Feel free to message him if you are interested.
Now, does might equal right in Illyriad? If not, then is it fair for StA to receive the short end of the stick as far as both not being allowed to claim even the most harpy infested of remote islands while being forced to exodus existing cities due to other alliance's previous claims when we violate such? I could accept one or the other, but not both together. If Chaos Armor has to move when accidentally settling on dubiously claimed territory, I fail to see how anything but a lack of military power would be an honest interpretation of why Chaos's alliance can't make similar claims of their own. If that's the only justification then, that means might equals right in this issue, which so many alliances have gone to war in the past to oppose.
One thing I'd be happy to consider is going back to immigration standards (which haven't had to be enforced yet as far as I can remember by the way) from Noryasha's original post making this thread if Chaos isn't forced to move.
Bonus history of StA for those strangely interested: Wars with S&B where cities were razed by StA were in our first few months in Illyriad, and I'm the only one who remains out of that group of players. S&B and StA were roughly the same size in population. Noryasha Grunk in the East and an S&B nearby started fighting and pulled everyone else in. After StA won that war (not sure if we had siege capability yet), S&B launched an attack with siege against Eastern players after a few months of rebuilding. I was in the Southwest sector, and sent reinforcements due to focusing on economy rather than barracks. These armies were sent to defend cities until the East had built up a large enough army to go on the offensive while retaining a foreign garrison. After S&B's army was reduced by the East the West supported the East's sieges on capitals of the highest population players and also supplied some feints prior to the launch of sieges. If you're looking for perpetrators of atrocious smaller player smiting that possibly followed after that victory, all those (mostly Noryasha) that potentially qualify have left the game long ago while we were waiting for the new UI. You'd have to ask Jefke about that, since I was in the West while he was in the East. In addition remember this was the second time of three times we fought, with StA unquestionably being attacked the second time, though that's probably not enough justification anymore for what Noryasha did. Also I think it was due to Noryyasha roleplaying an orc and the fact that the game was comparatively brand new and thus no one knew better.
EDIT: Also when the map was expanded and the free city move announced StA sieged a few inactive players with prestige boosted cities and moved them to the island with the free teleport. As far as I can remember, during the second war with S&B and against inactives are the only times StA did any sieging.
Edited by Duuvian - 10 Feb 2012 at 06:30
|
 |
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 06:33 |
Duuvian wrote:
Chaos was invited to move to a spot on the mainland near another player. It seems that someone was occupying armies for a future claim a number of squares away from the location Chaos moved to. Chaos is being forced to exodus his existing city. Feel free to message him if you are interested. |
I don't see why you don't just explain the situation here, rather than beating around the bush about it. It'd make it a lot easier than contacting him and trying to find out about it.
|
|
|
 |