Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - StA lays claim to Farra Isla
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedStA lays claim to Farra Isla

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 891011>
Author
Angrim View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 17:14
Posturing is part of any diplomatic relationship.  StA has stated its intentions as a deterrent.  They are entitled, imo, to do so.  Whether the deterrent works or not is now in the hands of the other players.  In that way I do see it as analogous to the H? 10 sq radius warning, and that is where the similarity ends.  Anyone is capable of testing the resolve of either alliance, and should own any consequences that result.
Back to Top
Silverlake View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 19:23
 
Originally posted by Angrim Angrim wrote:

In that way I do see it as analogous to the H? 10 sq radius warning, and that is where the similarity ends.

One more time, it was a request to open up communications, not a warning, infer much?  I'm starting to get a complex that your alliance does like mine Confused  wanna hug it out?
Back to Top
Angrim View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10 Feb 2012 at 20:22
No hostility implied, Silverlake.  Perhaps "warning" was poorly chosen, but I suspect StA also sees their announcement as a way to forestall conflict.  In the original post, StA also invited communication regarding others who wanted to move to Farra.  But behind both offers is the assertion of a right to deny any change to the status quo.  It seems disingenuous to me to pretend that the threat of forcible removal is not backing up that request.  It is the proverbial offer you can't refuse.  In both cases I would rather understand the attitude of my potential neighbors before I move/settle, so in that way I'm happy to see these announcements posted whether I heed them or not.
Back to Top
Brids17 View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 01:26
Originally posted by Silverlake Silverlake wrote:

I'm starting to get a complex that your alliance does like mine Confused 

Why is it the moment someone says anything about H? you automatically call them out as not liking them? I think you're seeing what you want to see.
Back to Top
Silverlake View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 02:11
Thank you Angrim.

Birds, LOL, "Someone," try three people from the same alliance, that's a collective behavior, just own it and move on.  
Back to Top
Llyorn Of Jaensch View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2010
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 924
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 02:13
Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Originally posted by Silverlake Silverlake wrote:

I'm starting to get a complex that your alliance does like mine Confused 

Why is it the moment someone says anything about H? you automatically call them out as not liking them? I think you're seeing what you want to see.


It was meant in jest. I assumed that was rather obvious with all the past 'hug it out etc'.

But for heavens sake Harmless are on the receiving end of more mud, accusation, jealousy, envy, subversion, metagaming and god knows what else than the rest of Illy combined so you'll excuse us for being a little quick on the draw.
"ouch...best of luck."
HonoredMule
Back to Top
Jane DarkMagic View Drop Down
Postmaster
Postmaster
Avatar

Joined: 10 Sep 2011
Location: Tennessee
Status: Offline
Points: 554
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 06:06
Originally posted by Llyorn Of Jaensch Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:

Originally posted by Brids17 Brids17 wrote:

Originally posted by Silverlake Silverlake wrote:

I'm starting to get a complex that your alliance does like mine Confused 

Why is it the moment someone says anything about H? you automatically call them out as not liking them? I think you're seeing what you want to see.


It was meant in jest. I assumed that was rather obvious with all the past 'hug it out etc'.

But for heavens sake Harmless are on the receiving end of more mud, accusation, jealousy, envy, subversion, metagaming and god knows what else than the rest of Illy combined so you'll excuse us for being a little quick on the draw.

I know that neither Angrim nor I meant anything critical of H?'s policy/request/recommendation, we were just trying to use it as a point of comparison in an academic-type(trying to think of a better word) discussion...  Not as a direct comparison, but of an alliance making a request or recommendation of any type.  Your's I think is very reasonable.  STa's not at all reasonable.   It's hard to find the correct language that won't offend anyone... But I know Angrim well in-game and he's not the type to get all hot and bothered about silly issues.  I have more of a tendency but will always admit when I mean to be offensive, and not saying I've never said anything critical of H?(I did during the tourney for sure), but this is not one of those times!  I've been similarly critical of people in my own alliance though(Ask Rill).  I'm just a premature old crank that likes a good debate.
Back to Top
Silverlake View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 417
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 06:13
All in good fun, can we hug now?  Jane thanks for the Beer Big smile
Back to Top
Angrim View Drop Down
Postmaster General
Postmaster General
Avatar

Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Location: Laoshin
Status: Offline
Points: 1173
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 14:45
Originally posted by Llyorn Of Jaensch Llyorn Of Jaensch wrote:


It was meant in jest. I assumed that was rather obvious with all the past 'hug it out etc'.

Hugging doesn't always register as a jest to us, Llyorn.  Remember that we have a whole branch of the confederacy dedicated to public displays of affection and they take their hugging very seriously.
Back to Top
Lashka View Drop Down
Greenhorn
Greenhorn


Joined: 29 Sep 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 89
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 Feb 2012 at 15:16
It's true...Improper hugging technique can be seen as an act of war. 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 891011>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.