Spreadsheet comparing the 2 sides of the war |
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
| Author | |
geofrey
Postmaster General
Joined: 31 May 2011 Status: Offline Points: 1013 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 18:30 |
I believe it is possible to access the sov. information through the api/data info.
|
|
![]() |
|
JimJams
Forum Warrior
Joined: 20 Sep 2011 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 16:58 |
|
While all the notes other made on the previous posts are valid, still those numbers are interesting reading.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 14:38 |
|
I agree that it really isn't a military town. However, large cities can support larger numbers of troops (to a point), so population can't be dismissed entirely.
As I said in other posts that tried to compare numbers: while it is difficult to do a quick comparison of stats, you can identify military players and alliances simply by looking at a few cities. |
|
![]() |
|
Elmindra
Forum Warrior
Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 464 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 14:12 |
|
If you have 8x Farmsteads V then you are not a military town period. A military town has 18-20 sovs level 2-3 all devoted to troop production.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 12:32 |
|
While this is a nice effort to be scientific, I think the assumption that "most sov is used for troops" pretty much breaks the entire premise. Some alliances have many big cities with 8x Farmstead V (or Fishery V). Other alliances have mostly 8x Military III around their cities. Comparing those two configurations is apples to oranges. Even more so if the Farmstead V counts as 5 points (when it should be 0), but the Military III counts as 3 points.
A better methodology would be to eliminate all squares with Sov IV and V, assuming they are Farmsteads or Fisheries. Also eliminate all sovereignty claims over 20 for a city. I suspect this is spreadsheet just takes the alliance stat page Lands Claimed stat. Many people have pointed out that Consone spent a lot of time talking about the math. The numbers don't mean much unless you filter out all the noise, and that is certainly no small task. Edited by Brandmeister - 13 Jan 2014 at 12:32 |
|
![]() |
|
Yhina
Greenhorn
Joined: 04 May 2012 Status: Offline Points: 61 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 09:32 |
|
besides what Rill point out on whether those sov lands are used for troops or just for food ( higher level sov lands are more likely to be food bonuses, while low ones 1-2, most likely for troop bonuses) , you are considering just sov I for each sov land?
Ex. you average sov lands per town.. and if you get, lets say 10, you say average bonus 50%? Which would be true only IF all sov lands were level 1... Considering the linear cost for sov II from sov I ( and becoming exponential after that point), it would be safer to assume that most of those sov lands are level II than I. And probably reducing a few sov lands, on the averaged land per town result, to reflect food sov, could lead to more "accurate" average results. |
|
![]() |
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 6903 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 08:54 |
|
I don't know, everyone just tells me where to go and what to do.
|
|
![]() |
|
Halcyon
Forum Warrior
Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Israel Status: Offline Points: 360 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 08:47 |
|
Need reinforcments Rill?
|
|
![]() |
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer Joined: 17 Jun 2011 Location: California Status: Offline Points: 6903 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 08:36 |
|
/me goes out to claim more sov
I'm guessing that the spreadsheet assumes everything is troop sov? Alliances that support large cities with lots of food sov might end up looking more powerful than they actually are. I can only speak for my armies, and they can't fight their way out of a paper bag. That is, if they could find the bag to begin with.
|
|
![]() |
|
Sir A
Wordsmith
Joined: 26 Sep 2012 Status: Offline Points: 121 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 Jan 2014 at 08:22 |
|
A while back someone made a topic about where the most powerful players are...now I present to you a comparison of the sov/troop production of all the alliances on both sides of the war. The spreadsheet compares both sides statistics on each individual alliance involved and on both sides as a whole. These stats won't necessarily tell which alliances are the best at war but it will give some kind of idea as to where each alliance stands in terms of troop production...which will give a kind of idea as to how fast an alliance can make troops assuming the alliances use most of their sov for troop production bonuses and are constantly producing troops. It also compares some other things that you can check out. Let me know if I made any mistakes or missed anything. Everything is color coded and there should be no bias. Just numbers.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123 |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |