[SOUTH] - Code of Conduct Signatories |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345> |
| Author | |
Nokigon
Postmaster General
Player Council - Historian Joined: 07 Nov 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1452 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 14:18 |
|
There have been talks about the possibility of an Illy Code of Conduct. The Dominion had a few very promising talks with Dittobite about such an agreement. They didn't really lead anywhere but the interest is there.
I suggest that if you want to do something about it, try drawing something up and contacting a few major alliances to see their opinions. Very little diplomacy done on the forums has ever led to any good.
|
|
![]() |
|
Velociryx
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Location: Myrtle Beach, S Status: Offline Points: 45 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 14:06 |
|
See, here's the thing:
If you want peace, it's as simple as stopping dispatching sieges. Your opponents are beaten. You've won. Good job. You WANT the symbols. You WANT the elation of seeing your foes humiliated, and they're not giving it to you. That makes you mad. I get it...I do. But let's face it...you could have Peace today if you wanted it. It's just that the symbols are more important to you. That can lead you into very dark places. If you persist...if you hunt this alliance to extinction, I can guarantee you that you won't like the shape of the world you and yours wind up ruling. It will be formed on the basis of and in response to your actions. Make those actions good ones. Live up to the name you have chosen for yourselves, because we need you to. |
|
![]() |
|
Velociryx
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Location: Myrtle Beach, S Status: Offline Points: 45 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 13:56 |
|
Okay...you have a thread which "happened to contain" a peace offer. We'll go with that then. The central point remains. They're your threads, guy. If you can't be arsed to update them, how's that a failing on my part?
I'm sorry the subject matter is a bit dark and dreary and negative. I'll work on coming up with ways of putting a more positive spin on one alliance beating another to death, while claiming "we're doing all we can" to stop it. And no - you haven't seen my interest. I don't post, and I don't get involved in politics outside our very small sphere of influence. That should be very telling, shouldn't it? That the current situation is seen as so bad by normally uninterested outsiders that they stop to say something, and I wasn't even the first. It appears that Arctic was. That should be sounding all kinds of alarm bells. Edited by Velociryx - 18 Jul 2014 at 13:57 |
|
![]() |
|
HATHALDIR
Forum Warrior
Joined: 01 Jul 2011 Location: Adelaide Status: Offline Points: 380 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 13:41 |
|
Actually i do not have a peace thread. I posted an open letter to H? and the second was a question that was atrfully dodged, but again addressed to H?.
As to keeping you updated, i haven't seen your interest until this thread, and what is in it is all negative and derogatory. Try some positive ideas, you might be surprised where they take you! |
|
|
There's worse blokes than me!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Velociryx
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Location: Myrtle Beach, S Status: Offline Points: 45 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 13:37 |
|
As to this: What makes you think we are not doing what we can?
Ima go out on a limb here and posit the radical notion that it might have something to do with the fact that you're continuing to kick the clearly defeated opponent? :) Maybe? |
|
![]() |
|
Velociryx
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Location: Myrtle Beach, S Status: Offline Points: 45 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 13:25 |
|
Hath, you DO have a peace thread, right here on this forum, do you not?
I'm not your mother...if you don't keep it updated, you're right....we won't know. I took the thread that YOU opened (which was where I got the quote from re: terms in the other thread) as the latest info available for public consumption. I'm sorry you find that unreasonable. :) Edited by Velociryx - 18 Jul 2014 at 13:26 |
|
![]() |
|
HATHALDIR
Forum Warrior
Joined: 01 Jul 2011 Location: Adelaide Status: Offline Points: 380 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 13:16 |
|
What makes you think we are not talking and working towards a settlement? Why have you not asked for a status update? What makes you think we are not doing what we can?
What gives you the right to compare us to peepertrators of domestic violence? A new low in tacky references. I have not received a mail from any alliance offering to bring help to a settlement, with the exception of Captain Kindly over Skype. If anyone wants to know the status, find out before making posts steming from ignorance please. |
|
|
There's worse blokes than me!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Velociryx
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Location: Myrtle Beach, S Status: Offline Points: 45 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 13:13 |
|
I absolutely agree...thus my earlier comments about our new Sheriffs and the importance of symbols. I would rather that it NOT BE open season, and it could be. All it takes is the symbol of precedent.
I understand that the peace terms are symbolic. As was pointed out previously though, H? has lost some sixty percent of her players and her population. There's no symbolic gesture anywhere that can compare to that. It is a symbol unto itself. Here's another symbol: Right now, we've got a collection of alliances with 5x or more the population of another. They've got the alliance on the ground, and are in the process of kicking it to death. Out of curiosity, what do you think would happen to SOUTH (pop 3m) if we began a war with, say, the Illy Beach Club (pop 600k) and it appeared that we were intent on hunting them to extinction? Just...based on prior wars, extrapolate what the community response would be. ;) |
|
![]() |
|
Hora
Postmaster
Joined: 10 May 2010 Status: Offline Points: 839 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 13:06 |
|
Yep, you're right there. But only big alliances can enforce such a code/agreement/rule... or ignore it. Smaller alliances or single players might have hard times when trying to achieve same political impact / military power
|
|
![]() |
|
Velociryx
Greenhorn
Joined: 11 Sep 2012 Location: Myrtle Beach, S Status: Offline Points: 45 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18 Jul 2014 at 13:02 |
|
The only change I'd make to your statement would be this:
"Everyone knows the importance of having players, and anyone seiging a player out of the game had better have a really good explanation, or become a target himself." Edited by Velociryx - 18 Jul 2014 at 13:03 |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12345> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |