Æsir's Crusade vs. TLR

Message Rating: Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic

crusade suck. and BTW... Might IS right. 

btw
What follows is Æsir's declaration of extermination, sent to TLR:

lol hypocritical rascals... 

what you do here is no where different fro what TLR did... well actually it's WORSE lol at your stoooopid ideas about right, and community, everyone shall be free to play as they like. 
what you try to defend is an illy that has no future. it's ok to defend noobs and those that are weak. BUT it's not right to stick the brown nose into other alliances affairs AND think you have the right to do so. what ego you dudes have, seriously....
anyway, the trend you saw here, to ignore, is only due to the imminent release, then illy's player are just concerned about their own interests. to rephrase that:
it's but a silly excuse to play the valiant knight card. all what matters and will always matter is the benefits one would get by doing certain things.
feel free to roll over EF, but i am NOT pleased by this. for he did nothing wrong. ( asking medals was mhe, but doesn't justifies the annihilation of TRL ) 

BTW they where defending in the war they won, so much for fair play, SUCKERS 

Edited by SugarFree - 25 Jul 2012 at 15:32

Author	Message Rating: Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic Printable Version Translate Topic
SugarFree Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Forum Warrior Joined: 09 Feb 2012 Status: Offline Points: 350	Posted: 25 Jul 2012 at 15:00
	crusade suck. and BTW... Might IS right. btw What follows is Æsir's declaration of extermination, sent to TLR: lol hypocritical rascals... what you do here is no where different fro what TLR did... well actually it's WORSE lol at your stoooopid ideas about right, and community, everyone shall be free to play as they like. what you try to defend is an illy that has no future. it's ok to defend noobs and those that are weak. BUT it's not right to stick the brown nose into other alliances affairs AND think you have the right to do so. what ego you dudes have, seriously.... anyway, the trend you saw here, to ignore, is only due to the imminent release, then illy's player are just concerned about their own interests. to rephrase that: it's but a silly excuse to play the valiant knight card. all what matters and will always matter is the benefits one would get by doing certain things. feel free to roll over EF, but i am NOT pleased by this. for he did nothing wrong. ( asking medals was mhe, but doesn't justifies the annihilation of TRL ) BTW they where defending in the war they won, so much for fair play, SUCKERS Edited by SugarFree - 25 Jul 2012 at 15:32

invictusa Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List Forum Warrior Joined: 16 Dec 2011 Status: Offline Points: 488	Posted: 25 Jul 2012 at 14:59
	You aren't alone. I can not speak for my alliance, but I do not feel a player's obtuse demeanor necessarily merits his destruction.
	...and miles to go before I sleep.

LostEros Members Profile Send Private Message Find Members Posts Add to Buddy List New Poster Joined: 25 Jul 2012 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 46	Posted: 25 Jul 2012 at 14:55
	When I first began playing in Illy, I recall all of the noble talk about how the strong will protect players from bullies in the game. Now I see an instance of unprovoked attacks (war) on the admittedly rough-around-the-edges TLR by a significantly larger group, basically because it would seem that Aesir doesn't approve of the leader, Eternal Fire. I am curious as to people's thinking about this case of "might makes right." This sets a dangerous precedent for the future of Illyriad if everyone simply turns away and remains silent while a fringe group gets bullied and likely destroyed because a larger group of players have decided they have the moral superiority to decide which alliances may exist in their world. *mod edit to remove private messages* I follow GC when I can. I know that a lot of people seem to dislike Eternal Fire, but where does it end when hatred of a player provides the rationalization to destroy all the members of an alliance? Don't we have enough of this kind of self-righteousness in real life? If someone despises Eternal Fire that much, then they should target him. Instead, Æsir has claimed the right to pass moral judgement and exterminate the evil race of players who offend their own ambitious ideals. I smell hypocrisy. Perhaps I am alone. Edited by GM Luna - 25 Jul 2012 at 15:20