SIN War Declaration Against SHARK |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 678910 17> |
| Author | |
Pico
New Poster
Joined: 22 May 2015 Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 21:39 |
|
what point is that? that I can´t challenge an alliance with a land claim? what´s the point of having one then?? 1 player vs 1 alliance and T-O and other confeds of T-SC need to step up and clear the siege?? Please, have some common sense when posting.
|
|
![]() |
|
Pellinell
Forum Warrior
Joined: 08 Apr 2012 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 298 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 21:12 |
|
He's likely reffering to T-O stomping Stomps armies. What he fails to mention is Takeda was away and could not defend his city, thus SC asked us to remove the siege. We did and Pico declared war. (Lucky for him I was away on business or I'd of razed a few of his cities to make a point.)
Not even in the same category as what is happening now. But when you have no defense for your BS it's not easy making stuff up! And I'm not "complaining" just pointing out what I believe is a pile on. |
|
![]() |
|
abstractdream
Postmaster General
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Oarnamly Status: Offline Points: 1857 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 20:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Lotharblack
Greenhorn
Joined: 13 Dec 2014 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 65 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 19:14 |
|
Forum war is brutal so far , certainly more than the actual one :P
|
|
|
Lord Loth
|
|
![]() |
|
Agalloch
Wordsmith
Joined: 12 Feb 2015 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 127 |
Post Options
Thanks(2)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 17:50 |
|
You know I cant keep from chuckling whenever I read some of the BS people say here, I havent been playing this game for even a year yet and was involved in one war so far only but I do remember being dog piled on by some of the very players complaining here about it!!!
Some didn't even bother declaring .. Not being a cry baby just pointing some of the obvious mistakes stated here since mano seems to think pico did the dog pilling I think it was 8 alliances vs what 8 or 10 players? Anyways sorry for the interruption go back to presenting your point of views :P
|
|
![]() |
|
Venita
Greenhorn
Joined: 02 Oct 2011 Location: Florida Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(3)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 14:41 |
|
Wow
No wonder I don't read the forums much. Too many people verbally bashing each other. I am going to make a couple comments and that is all. Congrats Sir Brad aka Stuk, you were known as the Villian in NC and if you read this link, now SHARK is the villian. (kinda fun being the villian isn't it Stuk?? this is stated with humor in my voice in case you cannot hear me )I do not think that SIN and TVM had any agreement prior until towards the end of the war. I DO think that SIN decided to take advantage of a situation where we were low on troops in Newlands due to the recent war, and even had "rumors" of Christmas of the next war from SIN. I was not shocked AT ALL when they declared early. That is how they operate. Why SHOULD they let us have a breather?? Makes no sense to do so, if you are on their side. They did the correct strategy. I would have recommended attack myself, if I was in their alliance. Many SIN members are excellent military players. There are MANY (and I won't name anyone) that are SCARED of SIN! Well I am not. This is a game , one that I love to play and engage others in battle. Should I lose, pffft big deal, I shall dust off my clothes, get back up and rebuild. I would also like to know WHICH alliances, if declared on by SIN would NOT be asking their CONFEDS for help????? Is that not what a confed means????? perhaps I need a new dictionary.... May we all take a step BACK, remember this is a MILITARY GAME.... leave the pettiness out of it. Let's keep this FUN ... this is my personal view If you reply to it, don't expect an additional answer from me, I am way too busy trying to figure out how to attack SIN lmao!! Hey Pell I dont have a billion (troops you know lol) , but how about one beer???? |
|
![]() |
|
Lord Moonpie
New Poster
Joined: 20 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 21 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 13:47 |
|
There was never an agreement between SIN and TVM, the only agreements were between DSD South members RE and T-SC. Sorry to disappoint, I love a good conspiracy myself, but there simply wasn't one here
|
|
|
I am Lord Moonpie, Praetor Diplomaticus of Trivium. The above statements are my own opinions and do not reflect the opinions or policies of Trivium unless otherwise stated.
|
|
![]() |
|
Brandmeister
Postmaster General
Joined: 12 Oct 2012 Location: Laoshin Status: Offline Points: 2396 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 13:36 |
|
There is some danger to escalation, as that encourages both sides to keep bringing in allies, increasing confusion and potential damage.
However, it doesn't seem very practical that SHARK would accept defeat by a challenger when they had the option to call upon nearby allies. Especially not on the challenger's terms. Whether or not that invalidates SHARK's status as the #1 alliance is purely a matter of (very biased) opinion. Storm's neutrality seems genuine. If it's a plot, it must be a very elaborate one. |
|
![]() |
|
asr
Wordsmith
Joined: 22 Nov 2012 Status: Offline Points: 109 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 12:27 |
|
Sin is full military alliance with active players. What i have seen and they have proved it.
This is no secret that big alliances are having players who are logging in once every week or so, and many are not military oriented nor don't care about crunching numbers or watching clock to send troops, not even waking up middle of the night to specially send troops on a game. So it is perfectly normal that Sin dominates on war. When i heard that Sin declared on Shark i was happy because i can now enter on a war, i quited being a builder and started changing sovs but now i have lost interest: its too much work. I'm tired already. Its stressful and no fun at all. Good luck everyone. |
|
![]() |
|
madmano
New Poster
Joined: 05 Jul 2015 Status: Offline Points: 38 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10 Nov 2015 at 11:18 |
|
These are the words of .mjolnir
first and to all. I came to heat to help prop up an old alliance with many inactive accts. we tried for while and then merge thought came to mind. as independant member of heat I asked around to some who are aware. they declined for thier own reasons and I wish all well. I chanced to speak with pellinell one day and I said heat was looking to merge and make an all active alliance at which point he caught me by surprise with a statement to similar effect. we parted company in the chat and few days passed. I contacted him and we began a formal negotiation as to a merger. when all was of satisfactory for both we made storm. Storm is neutral with regards to all lasting nap and confed. we are well able to defend our interests even now and we are dedicated to this prospect. While we will not engage in this war does not mean we not engage in war. this is a war game. As madmano previously stated in this forum thread, when and if we go to war, it will be to serve the interests of our members liberty, prosperity, and a strategic advantage for the alliance as a group. As to the present war. Storm has no interest in this issue as is pertains to us not at all. As an alliance we wish to engage all alliances with a congenial diplomacy and we are happy and quite willing to be of aid to all whom may have a need. all trading will be done through the market for the sake of transparancy. As to the feelings of our members we encourage all to voice the feelings in a game of community. We do not expect all to feel the same way all the time. We enjoy the diversity of thought and direction. vibrant and enthusiastic. we do feel it good for the game. This is same in Storm. we are all met from different roads and backrounds different humors and style. we have undertaken to put forward a desire to push these things down and lift instead a grooup of willing players to attempt what is possible and have some fun and friendship with former enemies and combatants. deeds alone are the full measure of all. the rest is propaganda. As to the present war I am sure all expect confeds to be ulitized in a game which provides for them. I am happy to say I have respect for players on both sides and I wish each side a good fortune in the hostilities. Illy is a game of smart people and high ego where all have the wise words. I think each side likes thier alliance and wish to engage the enemy so to speak. I hope this is done in as good a sportmanship as war allows and when the war is over the winners will be generous victors. The finest quality of the victor is the ability to be merciful to those that have been vanquished. I am happy to see people enjoy the game and play in the style that suits them. Each is the architect of their own destiny. thanks and cheers to all |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 678910 17> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |