SIN War Declaration Against SHARK

After Sharks actions in the last year or so I'm surprised they even have any allies.  
Lets see now...

a) take a few Shark players, form another alliance, and hit Roads for no apparent or declared reason (boredom?).....then run back to Shark afterwards
b) take a few Shark players, form another alliance with the express and stated intention of starting a war, start it, lose it.....then run back to Shark afterwards
c) ex Shark player sitting in safety within a non combatant alliance sending attacks onto war combatants under (b) as above, then blame it on a sitter.....then run back to Shark afterwards
d) deliberately landing cities within another alliance's sphere of influence and starting yet another war...
e) asking for assistance, in GC at the very least (yes, you were spotted HR), when a much smaller alliance decides enough is enough and declares war on them, drag in another top 5 alliance...escalate a minor war into a major conflict why don't you?

That about sums it up....and these people apparently have Allies????

It seems that you have trouble with reading comprehension binky, it was made abundantly clear that we are neutral in the sense we don't accept confeds.

I see yet another example of pile on warfare. Which I have a problem with, thus my comments.

Lost all respect for Vic and Shark. I shall be watching closely.

idk why vic joined in on the war. just saying what it looks like from my pov

Jax wrote: Dungshoveleux wrote: Was it ever a 1:1? Whilst there have been substantial "re-organisations" of people aligned against SHARK, I don't see significant changes in SHARK itself. That said, it isn't a 1:1.  The initial SIN 1:1 declaration was, in my opinion, just words designed to make them "look" more like David vs Goliath.   Shark is significantly larger than SIN, so it's understanding why SIN would do that before the war declaration. SIN was able to reorganize to increase their numbers because they're not as large whereas Shark does not have to(They could of had members from VIC just to fill up few the remaining spaces, but they rather have the whole alliance involved as it goes to show). Again, having VIC join in on the havoc clearly shows that Shark fears that they won't be able to defend their territories without even more firepower than they already have available. So in a way, it was a 1 on 1 that was declined.