SIN War Declaration Against SHARK

Aurordan wrote: Yeah, it's unclear to me why SIN didn't expect SHARK's allies to immediately declare war on them.  That seems like a no-brainer.

I can think of at least one good reason: escalation breeds escalation. That's how the last war got out of hand.

Jax wrote: Dungshoveleux wrote: Was it ever a 1:1? Whilst there have been substantial "re-organisations" of people aligned against SHARK, I don't see significant changes in SHARK itself. That said, it isn't a 1:1.  The initial SIN 1:1 declaration was, in my opinion, just words designed to make them "look" more like David vs Goliath.   Shark is significantly larger than SIN, so it's understanding why SIN would do that before the war declaration. SIN was able to reorganize to increase their numbers because they're not as large whereas Shark does not have to(They could of had members from VIC just to fill up few the remaining spaces, but they rather have the whole alliance involved as it goes to show). Again, having VIC join in on the havoc clearly shows that Shark fears that they won't be able to defend their territories without even more firepower than they already have available. So in a way, it was a 1 on 1 that was declined.

idk why vic joined in on the war. just saying what it looks like from my pov

Lost all respect for Vic and Shark. I shall be watching closely.

It seems that you have trouble with reading comprehension binky, it was made abundantly clear that we are neutral in the sense we don't accept confeds.

I see yet another example of pile on warfare. Which I have a problem with, thus my comments.