Play Now Login Create Account
illyriad
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Siege Breaking Defence or Offence?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSiege Breaking Defence or Offence?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 789
Author
Ossian View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior
Avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 456
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Apr 2013 at 13:10
Originally posted by Shadar Logoth Shadar Logoth wrote:

Ok, lets break the dude's file open...
 
it seemed inevitable that when a long standing player like Shads starts pointing out the contradictions and changes in H? policy concerning breaking of sieges that The_Dude from RES would chime in, not with a reasoned argument, but with a "snide comment"  designed to provoke and offend.
 
Shads reply, in contrast, has been restrained.   We could break The_Dude's file open a bit further from early days at MK right up to his most recent inference concerning the mysterious dissappearance of his own troops to reveal a far more fuller picture, but we must not stoop to personal attacks, smears and character assasination. 
 
Shadar Logoth's experience and reputation as a fair minded player speaks volumes against the muck that is being heaped upon him by both TD and DD in this thread. It is true that there are posts written by killerpoodle which show that H? 's position on siege busting used to be a lot different to what is stated in thread.


Edited by Ossian - 21 Apr 2013 at 13:23
Back to Top
scaramouche View Drop Down
Forum Warrior
Forum Warrior


Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 432
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 Apr 2013 at 16:14
Originally posted by Kumomoto Kumomoto wrote:







Shad-- Your implied threat that anyone who argues with you will suffer from your J. Edgar Hoover style records of past behavior is rubbish. Nobody has better records in this game than H?.

And I love the recent presumption upon many fronts that Consone was some sort of innocent group of friends that would never have gotten into war if it weren't for the mechanics of the instigation of this war. First of all, if you go back in time, it was Consone, not H?, who was the big swinging, d*%k in Illy before this. Consone had roughly 2 times H? + DLord's pop (our only public confed), was unstoppable, and any issues with Consone were most commonly were brushed aside. The fact that they were naive enough to think that we had no other friends who were willing to jump in with us is not our problem and not at all indicative of the conflict. The folks opposing Consone at the end of the war were NOT the same numbers as the ones that Consone thought were going to oppose them at the beginning. Never forget that. I do not doubt for a second that if Consone knew who was going to ultimately oppose them, they would never have acted the way they did. Bullies never like equal odds.


Was you in Consone?..no?...then what gives you the right to contradict whether Consone wasn't a group of friends and new friends in the making?

The only naivity Consone showed was not taking your obvious contempt and disgust seriously enough at the beginning when Consone made themselves public.

OFC the numbers at the beginning of the conflict wasn't the same as the one at the end, due to the reasons stated before/during and after the war...Consone wasn't started to become solely a military power...but obviously that still hasn't sunk in.

As for being bullies..lol, this comes from one of Illy's biggest GC bully's.

The war is over..can you not stop your propaganda b******t

most seasoned players know H? aint no angels in this war so stop trying to paint yourselves whiter than white.
NO..I dont do the Fandango!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 789
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.