| Author |
|
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 16:07 |
Something must be done about all the Kurdruk bashing. I think I should start a thread about it.
|
 |
Avion
Wordsmith
Joined: 09 May 2012
Location: Meilla
Status: Offline
Points: 111
|
Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 15:45 |
Brids17 wrote:
Carl Zeis wrote:
You |
Lol, well said. =P |
No, too wordy.
|
|
Suppose they gave a war and nobody came?
|
 |
Prometheuz
Forum Warrior
Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 230
|
Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 12:39 |
Bonaparta wrote:
This obsessions some players have with H? has to stop! They are alliance like any other and how they choose to play the game is entirely up to them. |
In this game, posts about H? will likely continue to appear from time to time but I don't think it has much to do with "obsession" (as much as some of the board of directors may wish it to be).  But you are right, I can't think of any reason to start a thread on them at this time, in fact .
|
 |
Bonaparta
Postmaster
Joined: 03 Nov 2011
Location: Milky Way
Status: Offline
Points: 541
|
Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 11:50 |
|
This obsessions some players have with H? has to stop! They are alliance like any other and how they choose to play the game is entirely up to them.
|
|
|
 |
Gemley
Postmaster
Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Location: Ralidor
Status: Offline
Points: 586
|
Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 03:57 |
|
Lol all this bashing is making me have a lust for piñata blood. /me goes back to bashing a piñata in the shape of a "H."
Edited by Gemley - 02 Aug 2012 at 03:58
|
|
�I do not love the bright sword for it's sharpness, nor the arrow for it's swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend� - J.R.R. Tolkien
|
 |
Rill
Postmaster General
Player Council - Geographer
Joined: 17 Jun 2011
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 6903
|
Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 02:27 |
|
I see a distinction between advocating for pacifism and for diplomacy. For example, there are voices that call for restraint, for talking things through, for not being too quick to go to war, and for showing mercy toward vanquished foes. These people are not necessarily pacifists; their more nuanced positions may lead to accusations of hypocrisy from both sides of a conflict.
|
 |
Brids17
Postmaster General
Joined: 30 Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1483
|
Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 02:20 |
Carl Zeis wrote:
You |
Lol, well said. =P
|
 |
Carl Zeis
Greenhorn
Joined: 05 Feb 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 98
|
Posted: 02 Aug 2012 at 01:19 |
|
You
|
 |
Prometheuz
Forum Warrior
Joined: 23 Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 230
|
Posted: 01 Aug 2012 at 23:31 |
HonoredMule wrote:
Ander wrote:
Also what you said about extreme opinions are spot on. Too much of a thing becomes it's opposite. That was one thing we saw during the valar war. The people who advocated pacifism until that time joining together to form a violent pack, still firm in their belief that they were dispensing justice. |
Well I guess it's kind of hard not to appear the hypocrite when the standards we fail to uphold were never our standards to begin with. So while I've little complaint with the things that are being said on this thread overall, this bears address/reminder.
Harmless is NOT pacifist. We are a military alliance. Off the top of my head, Toothless is the only pacifist alliance I know, so none of the other Valar war participants qualify as violating this presumed principle either. Almost every training alliance lists themselves as peaceful, but they tend to define that rather loosely.
The Valar war (as I recall it) was never presented by us as some righteous quest for justice either. We were aggrieved by a litany of minor to medium political offenses and violently expressed our displeasure, focusing our attention on the individuals most responsible for Valar's offenses.
As it turns out, a lot of other large alliances were similarly aggrieved and felt entitled to their pound of flesh. I don't recall anyone who was an actual decision maker or alliance representative representing their alliance's actions as some holy crusade.
But then it was never that big a war in the first place. Without the torrential downpour of naysaying on the public forums and the long army travel times, cough and you'd have missed it.
|
We are not going to witter on about the Valar War are we? Thats last years apples. What we all really want to know, HM, is who are H? gonna bash next huh? C'mon tell us !
Edited by Prometheuz - 01 Aug 2012 at 23:33
|
 |
HonoredMule
Postmaster General
Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1650
|
Posted: 01 Aug 2012 at 22:49 |
Ander wrote:
Also what you said about extreme opinions are spot on. Too much of a thing becomes it's opposite. That was one thing we saw during the valar war. The people who advocated pacifism until that time joining together to form a violent pack, still firm in their belief that they were dispensing justice. |
Well I guess it's kind of hard not to appear the hypocrite when the standards we fail to uphold were never our standards to begin with. So while I've little complaint with the things that are being said on this thread overall, this bears address/reminder. Harmless is NOT pacifist. We are a military alliance. Off the top of my head, Toothless is the only pacifist alliance I know, so none of the other Valar war participants qualify as violating this presumed principle either. Almost every training alliance lists themselves as peaceful, but they tend to define that rather loosely. The Valar war (as I recall it) was never presented by us as some righteous quest for justice either. We were aggrieved by a litany of minor to medium political offenses and violently expressed our displeasure, focusing our attention on the individuals most responsible for Valar's offenses. As it turns out, a lot of other large alliances were similarly aggrieved and felt entitled to their pound of flesh. I don't recall anyone who was an actual decision maker or alliance representative representing their alliance's actions as some holy crusade. But then it was never that big a war in the first place. Without the torrential downpour of naysaying on the public forums and the long army travel times, cough and you'd have missed it.
|
|
"Apparently, quoting me is a 'thing' now." - HonoredMule
|
 |